脂蛋白(a)与经皮冠状动脉介入术后支架内长期再狭窄

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahmed K Mahmoud, Juan M Farina, Kamal Awad, Nima Baba Ali, Milagros Pereyra, Isabel G Scalia, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Mohamed N Allam, Moaz A Kamel, Anan A Abu Rmilah, Chieh-Ju Chao, Timothy Barry, Said Alsidawi, Steven J Lester, Peter M Pollak, Mohamad A Alkhouli, Kwan S Lee, Eric H Yang, Richard W Lee, John P Sweeney, David F Fortuin, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani
{"title":"脂蛋白(a)与经皮冠状动脉介入术后支架内长期再狭窄","authors":"Ahmed K Mahmoud, Juan M Farina, Kamal Awad, Nima Baba Ali, Milagros Pereyra, Isabel G Scalia, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Mohamed N Allam, Moaz A Kamel, Anan A Abu Rmilah, Chieh-Ju Chao, Timothy Barry, Said Alsidawi, Steven J Lester, Peter M Pollak, Mohamad A Alkhouli, Kwan S Lee, Eric H Yang, Richard W Lee, John P Sweeney, David F Fortuin, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has demonstrated its association with atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. However, its role in the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not clearly established. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between Lp(a) and ISR.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A retrospective study of adult patients who underwent successful PCI between January 2006 and December 2017 at the three Mayo Clinic sites and had a preprocedural Lp(a) measurement was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to the serum Lp(a) concentration [high Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL and low Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL]. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to compare risk of ISR between patients with high Lp(a) vs. those with low Lp(a). A total of 1209 patients were included, with mean age 65.9 ± 11.7 years and 71.8% were male. Median follow-up after baseline PCI was 8.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.4] years. Restenosis was observed in 162 (13.4%) patients. Median serum levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients affected by ISR vs. non-affected cases: 27 (IQR 73.8) vs. 20 (IQR 57.5) mg/dL, P = 0.008. The rate of ISR was significantly higher among patients with high Lp(a) vs. patients with low Lp(a) values (17.0% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.010). High Lp(a) values were independently associated with ISR events (hazard ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.37, P = 0.004), and this association was more prominent after the first year following the PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) is an independent predictor for long-term ISR and should be considered in the evaluation of patients undergoing PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lipoprotein(a) and long-term in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed K Mahmoud, Juan M Farina, Kamal Awad, Nima Baba Ali, Milagros Pereyra, Isabel G Scalia, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Mohamed N Allam, Moaz A Kamel, Anan A Abu Rmilah, Chieh-Ju Chao, Timothy Barry, Said Alsidawi, Steven J Lester, Peter M Pollak, Mohamad A Alkhouli, Kwan S Lee, Eric H Yang, Richard W Lee, John P Sweeney, David F Fortuin, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has demonstrated its association with atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. However, its role in the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not clearly established. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between Lp(a) and ISR.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A retrospective study of adult patients who underwent successful PCI between January 2006 and December 2017 at the three Mayo Clinic sites and had a preprocedural Lp(a) measurement was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to the serum Lp(a) concentration [high Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL and low Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL]. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to compare risk of ISR between patients with high Lp(a) vs. those with low Lp(a). A total of 1209 patients were included, with mean age 65.9 ± 11.7 years and 71.8% were male. Median follow-up after baseline PCI was 8.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.4] years. Restenosis was observed in 162 (13.4%) patients. Median serum levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients affected by ISR vs. non-affected cases: 27 (IQR 73.8) vs. 20 (IQR 57.5) mg/dL, P = 0.008. The rate of ISR was significantly higher among patients with high Lp(a) vs. patients with low Lp(a) values (17.0% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.010). High Lp(a) values were independently associated with ISR events (hazard ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.37, P = 0.004), and this association was more prominent after the first year following the PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) is an independent predictor for long-term ISR and should be considered in the evaluation of patients undergoing PCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae212\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]已被证实与动脉粥样硬化和心肌梗死有关。然而,它在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后支架内再狭窄(ISR)的发生中的作用尚未明确确定。本研究旨在探讨脂蛋白(a)与 ISR 之间的关系:本研究对 2006 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间在梅奥诊所的三个地点成功接受 PCI 并在术前测量过脂蛋白(a)的成年患者进行了回顾性研究。根据血清脂蛋白(a)浓度将患者分为两组(高脂蛋白(a)≥50 mg/dl 和低脂蛋白(a)) 结果:共纳入 1209 例患者,平均年龄(65.9 ± 11.7)岁,71.8% 为男性。基线PCI后的中位随访时间为8.8年(IQR为7.4年)。162例(13.4%)患者出现再狭窄。与未受影响的病例相比,受 ISR 影响的患者血清中位脂蛋白(a)水平明显更高:27 (IQR 73.8) vs. 20 (IQR 57.5) mg/dL,P=0.008。高 Lp(a) 值患者的 ISR 发生率明显高于低 Lp(a) 值患者(17.0% vs 11.6%,p=0.010)。高脂蛋白(a)值与ISR事件独立相关(HR为1.67,95%CI为1.18至2.37,P=0.004),这种相关性在PCI术后第一年后更为突出:结论:脂蛋白(a)是支架内长期再狭窄的独立预测因子,在评估接受 PCI 治疗的患者时应加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lipoprotein(a) and long-term in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Aims: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has demonstrated its association with atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. However, its role in the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not clearly established. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between Lp(a) and ISR.

Methods and results: A retrospective study of adult patients who underwent successful PCI between January 2006 and December 2017 at the three Mayo Clinic sites and had a preprocedural Lp(a) measurement was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to the serum Lp(a) concentration [high Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL and low Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL]. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to compare risk of ISR between patients with high Lp(a) vs. those with low Lp(a). A total of 1209 patients were included, with mean age 65.9 ± 11.7 years and 71.8% were male. Median follow-up after baseline PCI was 8.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.4] years. Restenosis was observed in 162 (13.4%) patients. Median serum levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients affected by ISR vs. non-affected cases: 27 (IQR 73.8) vs. 20 (IQR 57.5) mg/dL, P = 0.008. The rate of ISR was significantly higher among patients with high Lp(a) vs. patients with low Lp(a) values (17.0% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.010). High Lp(a) values were independently associated with ISR events (hazard ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.37, P = 0.004), and this association was more prominent after the first year following the PCI.

Conclusion: Lipoprotein(a) is an independent predictor for long-term ISR and should be considered in the evaluation of patients undergoing PCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信