印度目前诊断自身免疫性溶血性贫血的免疫血液学检测方法全国调查。

Q4 Medicine
Immunohematology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.2478/immunohematology-2024-010
Sudipta S Das, Soumya Das, Soma Agrawal, Shamee Shastry, Veena Shenoy, Suvro S Datta
{"title":"印度目前诊断自身免疫性溶血性贫血的免疫血液学检测方法全国调查。","authors":"Sudipta S Das, Soumya Das, Soma Agrawal, Shamee Shastry, Veena Shenoy, Suvro S Datta","doi":"10.2478/immunohematology-2024-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a common term for several disorders that differ from one another in terms of etiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment. Management of patients with AIHA has become increasingly evidence-based in recent years. While this development has resulted in therapeutic improvements, it also carries increased requirements for optimal diagnosis using more advanced laboratory tests. Unfortunately, limited data are available from developing countries regarding the testing and transfusion management of patients with AIHA. The main objective of this survey was to explore the current immunohematologic testing practices for the diagnosis of AIHA in India. This online survey consisted of 30 questions, covering the place of work, the number of AIHA cases encountered in the 3 preceding years, testing method(s), transfusion management, and so forth. Individuals representing 89 laboratories completed the survey; only 78 of which responded that AIHA testing was performed in their facility's laboratory. The majority of respondents agreed that the most commonly affected age-group comprised individuals of older than 20 years, with a female preponderance. Regarding transfusion management, respondents indicated that transfusion with \"best-match\" red blood cell units remains the most common practice. Column-agglutination technology is used by 92 percent of respondents as the primary testing method. Although a monospecific direct antiglobulin test is available at 73 percent of the sites, most of them have limited access to other resources that could diagnose cold or mixed AIHA. Merely 49 percent of responding laboratories have the resources to perform adsorption studies for the detection of alloantibodies. Furthermore, three-cell antibody screening reagents are unavailable at 32 percent of laboratories. In 72 percent of centers, clinical hematologists would prefer to consult a transfusion medicine specialist before administering treatment to AIHA patients. There is unanimous agreement regarding the need for a national registry. The survey data indicate wide variability in testing practices for patients with AIHA in India. Future studies are needed to focus on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of different testing strategies for developing countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"40 2","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A national survey of current immunohematologic testing practices for the diagnosis of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in India.\",\"authors\":\"Sudipta S Das, Soumya Das, Soma Agrawal, Shamee Shastry, Veena Shenoy, Suvro S Datta\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/immunohematology-2024-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a common term for several disorders that differ from one another in terms of etiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment. Management of patients with AIHA has become increasingly evidence-based in recent years. While this development has resulted in therapeutic improvements, it also carries increased requirements for optimal diagnosis using more advanced laboratory tests. Unfortunately, limited data are available from developing countries regarding the testing and transfusion management of patients with AIHA. The main objective of this survey was to explore the current immunohematologic testing practices for the diagnosis of AIHA in India. This online survey consisted of 30 questions, covering the place of work, the number of AIHA cases encountered in the 3 preceding years, testing method(s), transfusion management, and so forth. Individuals representing 89 laboratories completed the survey; only 78 of which responded that AIHA testing was performed in their facility's laboratory. The majority of respondents agreed that the most commonly affected age-group comprised individuals of older than 20 years, with a female preponderance. Regarding transfusion management, respondents indicated that transfusion with \\\"best-match\\\" red blood cell units remains the most common practice. Column-agglutination technology is used by 92 percent of respondents as the primary testing method. Although a monospecific direct antiglobulin test is available at 73 percent of the sites, most of them have limited access to other resources that could diagnose cold or mixed AIHA. Merely 49 percent of responding laboratories have the resources to perform adsorption studies for the detection of alloantibodies. Furthermore, three-cell antibody screening reagents are unavailable at 32 percent of laboratories. In 72 percent of centers, clinical hematologists would prefer to consult a transfusion medicine specialist before administering treatment to AIHA patients. There is unanimous agreement regarding the need for a national registry. The survey data indicate wide variability in testing practices for patients with AIHA in India. Future studies are needed to focus on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of different testing strategies for developing countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunohematology\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"65-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunohematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2024-010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2024-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自身免疫性溶血性贫血(AIHA)是多种疾病的统称,这些疾病在病因、发病机制、临床特征和治疗方法上各不相同。近年来,对自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者的治疗越来越以证据为基础。这一发展在改善治疗的同时,也对使用更先进的实验室检测进行最佳诊断提出了更高的要求。遗憾的是,发展中国家有关 AIHA 患者检测和输血管理的数据非常有限。本次调查的主要目的是了解印度目前用于诊断 AIHA 的免疫血液学检测方法。这项在线调查包括 30 个问题,涉及工作地点、前 3 年遇到的 AIHA 病例数、检测方法、输血管理等。89 个实验室的代表完成了调查,其中只有 78 个实验室回答其实验室进行了 AIHA 检测。大多数受访者都认为,最常受影响的年龄组是 20 岁以上的人,其中女性居多。关于输血管理,受访者表示,输注 "最匹配 "的红细胞单位仍然是最常见的做法。92%的受访者将柱状凝集技术作为主要检测方法。虽然 73% 的实验室可提供单特异性直接抗球蛋白检测,但大多数实验室只能获得有限的其他资源来诊断冷性或混合型 AIHA。仅有 49% 的受访实验室拥有进行吸附研究以检测异体抗体的资源。此外,32%的实验室没有三细胞抗体筛查试剂。在 72% 的中心,临床血液学专家希望在对 AIHA 患者进行治疗前咨询输血医学专家。大家一致认为有必要建立国家登记处。调查数据表明,印度 AIHA 患者的检测方法存在很大差异。未来的研究需要关注发展中国家不同检测策略的可行性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A national survey of current immunohematologic testing practices for the diagnosis of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in India.

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a common term for several disorders that differ from one another in terms of etiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment. Management of patients with AIHA has become increasingly evidence-based in recent years. While this development has resulted in therapeutic improvements, it also carries increased requirements for optimal diagnosis using more advanced laboratory tests. Unfortunately, limited data are available from developing countries regarding the testing and transfusion management of patients with AIHA. The main objective of this survey was to explore the current immunohematologic testing practices for the diagnosis of AIHA in India. This online survey consisted of 30 questions, covering the place of work, the number of AIHA cases encountered in the 3 preceding years, testing method(s), transfusion management, and so forth. Individuals representing 89 laboratories completed the survey; only 78 of which responded that AIHA testing was performed in their facility's laboratory. The majority of respondents agreed that the most commonly affected age-group comprised individuals of older than 20 years, with a female preponderance. Regarding transfusion management, respondents indicated that transfusion with "best-match" red blood cell units remains the most common practice. Column-agglutination technology is used by 92 percent of respondents as the primary testing method. Although a monospecific direct antiglobulin test is available at 73 percent of the sites, most of them have limited access to other resources that could diagnose cold or mixed AIHA. Merely 49 percent of responding laboratories have the resources to perform adsorption studies for the detection of alloantibodies. Furthermore, three-cell antibody screening reagents are unavailable at 32 percent of laboratories. In 72 percent of centers, clinical hematologists would prefer to consult a transfusion medicine specialist before administering treatment to AIHA patients. There is unanimous agreement regarding the need for a national registry. The survey data indicate wide variability in testing practices for patients with AIHA in India. Future studies are needed to focus on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of different testing strategies for developing countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信