{"title":"在真实世界中确定 \"标示外疗法 \"对多发性硬化症的疗效。","authors":"Lekha Pandit, Sharik Mustafa, Akshatha Sudhir, Puneeth Malapur, Anitha D'Cunha","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_114_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the factors, if any, that are associated with the efficacy of \"off-label therapies\" (OLTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients (N = 174) with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses, on OLTs with a generic formulation of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or rituximab biosimilar for ≥2 years were included. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status score (EDSS) 1 year before and ≥2 years after starting OLTs were recorded. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was done at baseline and at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median period of 4.1 years (2.4-24), ARR reduced in all (P < 0.0001) and EDSS improved in RRMS (P < 0.0001) patients but not in SPMS (P < 0.31) patients. Good responders were those who had RRMS (P = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.15), female gender (P 0.008, OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.7-26.8), and had early access to OLT (P = 0.006, OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.40). Baseline peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness identified the risk of conversion to SPMS (P < 0.01, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This limited prospective study suggests that early identification of patients who could potentially respond to unconventional but accessible therapies may be valuable in the treatment of MS, particularly in resource-poor regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining Effectiveness of \\\"Off-Label Therapies\\\" for Multiple Sclerosis in a Real-World Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Lekha Pandit, Sharik Mustafa, Akshatha Sudhir, Puneeth Malapur, Anitha D'Cunha\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aian.aian_114_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the factors, if any, that are associated with the efficacy of \\\"off-label therapies\\\" (OLTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients (N = 174) with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses, on OLTs with a generic formulation of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or rituximab biosimilar for ≥2 years were included. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status score (EDSS) 1 year before and ≥2 years after starting OLTs were recorded. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was done at baseline and at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median period of 4.1 years (2.4-24), ARR reduced in all (P < 0.0001) and EDSS improved in RRMS (P < 0.0001) patients but not in SPMS (P < 0.31) patients. Good responders were those who had RRMS (P = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.15), female gender (P 0.008, OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.7-26.8), and had early access to OLT (P = 0.006, OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.40). Baseline peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness identified the risk of conversion to SPMS (P < 0.01, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This limited prospective study suggests that early identification of patients who could potentially respond to unconventional but accessible therapies may be valuable in the treatment of MS, particularly in resource-poor regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232820/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_114_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_114_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的确定与多发性硬化症(MS)"标签外疗法"(OLT)疗效相关的因素(如果有的话):方法:纳入使用硫唑嘌呤通用制剂、霉酚酸酯或利妥昔单抗生物类似物进行OLT治疗≥2年的复发性缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)或继发性进展型多发性硬化症(SPMS)复发患者(N = 174)。在开始使用 OLTs 之前 1 年和之后≥2 年,记录年复发率(ARR)和扩展残疾状态评分(EDSS)。在基线和研究结束时进行了光学相干断层扫描(OCT):在4.1年(2.4-24年)的中位时间内,所有RRMS患者的ARR均有所下降(P<0.0001),EDSS有所改善(P<0.0001),但SPMS患者的EDSS没有改善(P<0.31)。反应良好的患者包括 RRMS(P = 0.001,比值比 [OR] 0.04,95% 置信区间 [CI]0.01-0.15)、女性(P 0.008,OR 6.67,95% CI 1.7-26.8)和早期接受 OLT(P = 0.006,OR 1.2,95% CI 1.05-1.40)。基线毛周视网膜神经纤维层厚度可确定转为SPMS的风险(P < 0.01,OR 1.03;95% CI 1.01-1.06):这项有限的前瞻性研究表明,早期识别可能对非常规但易接受的疗法产生反应的患者可能对多发性硬化症的治疗很有价值,尤其是在资源匮乏的地区。
Determining Effectiveness of "Off-Label Therapies" for Multiple Sclerosis in a Real-World Setting.
Objective: To determine the factors, if any, that are associated with the efficacy of "off-label therapies" (OLTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods: Consecutive patients (N = 174) with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses, on OLTs with a generic formulation of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or rituximab biosimilar for ≥2 years were included. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status score (EDSS) 1 year before and ≥2 years after starting OLTs were recorded. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was done at baseline and at the end of the study.
Results: During a median period of 4.1 years (2.4-24), ARR reduced in all (P < 0.0001) and EDSS improved in RRMS (P < 0.0001) patients but not in SPMS (P < 0.31) patients. Good responders were those who had RRMS (P = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.15), female gender (P 0.008, OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.7-26.8), and had early access to OLT (P = 0.006, OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.40). Baseline peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness identified the risk of conversion to SPMS (P < 0.01, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06).
Conclusions: This limited prospective study suggests that early identification of patients who could potentially respond to unconventional but accessible therapies may be valuable in the treatment of MS, particularly in resource-poor regions.
期刊介绍:
The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.