分解处理速度:首发精神病患者和未受影响的一级亲属的运动和认知洞察力。

0 PSYCHIATRY
Ángel Yorca-Ruiz, Rebeca Magdaleno Herrero, Víctor Ortiz García de la Foz, Nancy Murillo-García, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola
{"title":"分解处理速度:首发精神病患者和未受影响的一级亲属的运动和认知洞察力。","authors":"Ángel Yorca-Ruiz, Rebeca Magdaleno Herrero, Víctor Ortiz García de la Foz, Nancy Murillo-García, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Processing speed (PS) deficits represent a fundamental aspect of cognitive impairment, evident not only in schizophrenia but also in individuals undergoing their first episode of psychosis (FEP) and their unaffected first-degree relatives. Heterogeneity in tests assessing PS reflects the participation of motor and cognitive subcomponents to varying degrees. We aim to explore differences in performance of the subcomponents of PS in FEP patients, parents, siblings, and controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Results from tests, including Trail Making Test part A and part B, Digit Symbol Coding Test, Grooved Pegboard Test, and Stroop Word and Stroop Color subtests, were obtained from 133 FEP patients, 146 parents, and 202 controls. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed in controls to establish the structure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify if the other groups share this structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA revealed a two-factor model: Factor 1 for the motor subcomponent and Factor 2 for the cognitive subcomponent. Subsequently, CFA indicated a good fit for the remaining groups with differences in the relationship between the factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in the relationships of factors within a common structure suggest the involvement of different compensatory strategies among groups, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of PS deficits in patients and relatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking down processing speed: Motor and cognitive insights in first-episode psychosis and unaffected first-degree relatives.\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Yorca-Ruiz, Rebeca Magdaleno Herrero, Víctor Ortiz García de la Foz, Nancy Murillo-García, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Processing speed (PS) deficits represent a fundamental aspect of cognitive impairment, evident not only in schizophrenia but also in individuals undergoing their first episode of psychosis (FEP) and their unaffected first-degree relatives. Heterogeneity in tests assessing PS reflects the participation of motor and cognitive subcomponents to varying degrees. We aim to explore differences in performance of the subcomponents of PS in FEP patients, parents, siblings, and controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Results from tests, including Trail Making Test part A and part B, Digit Symbol Coding Test, Grooved Pegboard Test, and Stroop Word and Stroop Color subtests, were obtained from 133 FEP patients, 146 parents, and 202 controls. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed in controls to establish the structure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify if the other groups share this structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA revealed a two-factor model: Factor 1 for the motor subcomponent and Factor 2 for the cognitive subcomponent. Subsequently, CFA indicated a good fit for the remaining groups with differences in the relationship between the factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in the relationships of factors within a common structure suggest the involvement of different compensatory strategies among groups, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of PS deficits in patients and relatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2024.06.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2024.06.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:处理速度(PS)缺陷是认知障碍的一个基本方面,不仅在精神分裂症中很明显,而且在首次精神病发作(FEP)患者及其未受影响的一级亲属中也很明显。PS 评估测试的异质性反映了运动和认知子成分在不同程度上的参与。我们的目的是探讨FEP患者、其父母、兄弟姐妹和对照组在PS各子部分表现上的差异:我们从 133 名 FEP 患者、146 名家长和 202 名对照者那里获得了测试结果,包括路径制作测试 A 部分和 B 部分、数字符号编码测试、凹槽棋盘测试、Stroop 单词和 Stroop 颜色子测试。在对照组中采用了探索性因子分析(EFA)来确定结构,然后采用确证性因子分析(CFA)来验证其他组别是否具有相同的结构:EFA 揭示了一个双因子模型:结果:EFA 显示了一个双因子模型:因子 1 代表运动子成分,因子 2 代表认知子成分。随后,CFA 表明其余各组的拟合度良好,但各因子之间的关系存在差异:结论:在一个共同的结构中,各因子之间的关系存在差异,这表明各组之间存在不同的代偿策略,从而为了解患者和亲属 PS 缺陷的潜在机制提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breaking down processing speed: Motor and cognitive insights in first-episode psychosis and unaffected first-degree relatives.

Introduction: Processing speed (PS) deficits represent a fundamental aspect of cognitive impairment, evident not only in schizophrenia but also in individuals undergoing their first episode of psychosis (FEP) and their unaffected first-degree relatives. Heterogeneity in tests assessing PS reflects the participation of motor and cognitive subcomponents to varying degrees. We aim to explore differences in performance of the subcomponents of PS in FEP patients, parents, siblings, and controls.

Materials and methods: Results from tests, including Trail Making Test part A and part B, Digit Symbol Coding Test, Grooved Pegboard Test, and Stroop Word and Stroop Color subtests, were obtained from 133 FEP patients, 146 parents, and 202 controls. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed in controls to establish the structure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify if the other groups share this structure.

Results: EFA revealed a two-factor model: Factor 1 for the motor subcomponent and Factor 2 for the cognitive subcomponent. Subsequently, CFA indicated a good fit for the remaining groups with differences in the relationship between the factors.

Conclusions: Differences in the relationships of factors within a common structure suggest the involvement of different compensatory strategies among groups, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of PS deficits in patients and relatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信