前哨淋巴结评估在子宫内膜上皮内瘤治疗中的风险和益处。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2024.2372329
Lauren M Lim, Hadi Erfani, Katelyn B Furey, Koji Matsuo, X Mona Guo
{"title":"前哨淋巴结评估在子宫内膜上皮内瘤治疗中的风险和益处。","authors":"Lauren M Lim, Hadi Erfani, Katelyn B Furey, Koji Matsuo, X Mona Guo","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2372329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endometroid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a premalignant lesion to endometrial cancer. Increasing number of gynecologic oncologists are performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation during hysterectomy for EIN to ensure complete staging if there is cancer on the final specimen. However, there are no clear guidelines and the benefits and risks to performing SLN evaluation for EIN patients are unclear.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review examines the advantages and disadvantages of SLN evaluation for EIN patients and provides an algorithm to assist clinicians in selectively applying the procedure for maximal patient benefit. Relevant articles up to March 2024 were obtained from a PubMed search on SLN use with endometrial pathology.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Sentinel lymph node evaluation for patients with EIN is safe, feasible, and particularly important for the approximately 10% of patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma on final pathology. However, as most diagnosed carcinomas are low-risk, SLN evaluation would have limited oncologic benefit. While SLN assessment may overtreat most patients with EIN, a significant minority of patients will be improperly staged. We propose an algorithm highlighting the importance of maximal preoperative endometrial sampling and stratifying patients via risk factors to selectively identify those who would benefit most from SLN evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"745-753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risks and benefits of sentinel lymph node evaluation in the management of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren M Lim, Hadi Erfani, Katelyn B Furey, Koji Matsuo, X Mona Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2024.2372329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endometroid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a premalignant lesion to endometrial cancer. Increasing number of gynecologic oncologists are performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation during hysterectomy for EIN to ensure complete staging if there is cancer on the final specimen. However, there are no clear guidelines and the benefits and risks to performing SLN evaluation for EIN patients are unclear.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review examines the advantages and disadvantages of SLN evaluation for EIN patients and provides an algorithm to assist clinicians in selectively applying the procedure for maximal patient benefit. Relevant articles up to March 2024 were obtained from a PubMed search on SLN use with endometrial pathology.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Sentinel lymph node evaluation for patients with EIN is safe, feasible, and particularly important for the approximately 10% of patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma on final pathology. However, as most diagnosed carcinomas are low-risk, SLN evaluation would have limited oncologic benefit. While SLN assessment may overtreat most patients with EIN, a significant minority of patients will be improperly staged. We propose an algorithm highlighting the importance of maximal preoperative endometrial sampling and stratifying patients via risk factors to selectively identify those who would benefit most from SLN evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"745-753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2372329\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2372329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(EIN)是子宫内膜癌的前恶性病变。越来越多的妇科肿瘤专家在对子宫内膜上皮内瘤变进行子宫切除术时进行前哨淋巴结(SLN)评估,以确保在最终标本出现癌变时进行完整的分期。然而,目前还没有明确的指南,对EIN患者进行前哨淋巴结评估的益处和风险也不明确:这篇叙述性综述探讨了对EIN患者进行SLN评估的利弊,并提供了一种算法,以帮助临床医生有选择性地应用该手术,使患者获得最大益处。通过在PubMed上搜索子宫内膜病理学SLN的使用,获得了截至2024年3月的相关文章:专家意见:对EIN患者进行前哨淋巴结评估是安全、可行的,而且对最终病理结果为高危子宫内膜癌的约10%患者尤为重要。然而,由于大多数确诊的癌都是低风险的,因此前哨淋巴结评估对肿瘤学的益处有限。虽然SLN评估可能会过度治疗大多数EIN患者,但仍有相当一部分患者会被错误分期。我们提出了一种算法,强调了最大限度术前子宫内膜取样的重要性,并通过风险因素对患者进行分层,从而有选择性地识别出最受益于 SLN 评估的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risks and benefits of sentinel lymph node evaluation in the management of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

Introduction: Endometroid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a premalignant lesion to endometrial cancer. Increasing number of gynecologic oncologists are performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation during hysterectomy for EIN to ensure complete staging if there is cancer on the final specimen. However, there are no clear guidelines and the benefits and risks to performing SLN evaluation for EIN patients are unclear.

Areas covered: This narrative review examines the advantages and disadvantages of SLN evaluation for EIN patients and provides an algorithm to assist clinicians in selectively applying the procedure for maximal patient benefit. Relevant articles up to March 2024 were obtained from a PubMed search on SLN use with endometrial pathology.

Expert opinion: Sentinel lymph node evaluation for patients with EIN is safe, feasible, and particularly important for the approximately 10% of patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma on final pathology. However, as most diagnosed carcinomas are low-risk, SLN evaluation would have limited oncologic benefit. While SLN assessment may overtreat most patients with EIN, a significant minority of patients will be improperly staged. We propose an algorithm highlighting the importance of maximal preoperative endometrial sampling and stratifying patients via risk factors to selectively identify those who would benefit most from SLN evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信