欧洲精神病学协会(EPA)--早期职业精神病学家委员会关于受训者和早期职业精神病学家对抗抑郁治疗期间治疗药物监测(TDM)的使用和效用的态度调查。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Georgios Schoretsanitis, Christoph U Correll, Agorastos Agorastos, Alejandro Compaired Sanchez, Gamze Erzin, Ruxandra M Grigoras, Mateja Grizelj Benussi, Tomasz M Gondek, Sinan Guloksuz, Mikkel Højlund, Stefan Jerotic, Ozge Kilic, Enita Metaj, Deshwinder Singh Sidhu, Nikolina Skandali, Aliaksei Skuhareuski, Marit Tveito, Rick P F Wolthusen, Egor Chumakov, Renato de Filippis
{"title":"欧洲精神病学协会(EPA)--早期职业精神病学家委员会关于受训者和早期职业精神病学家对抗抑郁治疗期间治疗药物监测(TDM)的使用和效用的态度调查。","authors":"Georgios Schoretsanitis, Christoph U Correll, Agorastos Agorastos, Alejandro Compaired Sanchez, Gamze Erzin, Ruxandra M Grigoras, Mateja Grizelj Benussi, Tomasz M Gondek, Sinan Guloksuz, Mikkel Højlund, Stefan Jerotic, Ozge Kilic, Enita Metaj, Deshwinder Singh Sidhu, Nikolina Skandali, Aliaksei Skuhareuski, Marit Tveito, Rick P F Wolthusen, Egor Chumakov, Renato de Filippis","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2024.2367138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This survey assessed psychiatry residents'/early-career psychiatrists' attitudes towards the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previously developed questionnaire on attitudes on TDM utility during antipsychotic treatment was cross-sectionally disseminated by national coordinators between 01/01/2022-31/12/2023. The frequency of using TDM for antipsychotics other than clozapine was the main outcome in a linear regression analysis, including sex, clinical setting, caseload, and factors generated by an exploratory factor analysis. Comparisons between residents and early-career psychiatrists, respondents working in in- and outpatient settings, and low-/middle- and high-income countries were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 1,237 respondents completed the survey, with 37.9% having never used TDM for antipsychotics. Seven factors explained 41% of response variance; six of them were associated with frequency of TDM use (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Items with highest loadings for factors included clinical benefits of TDM (factors A and E: 0.7), negative expectations for beliefs of patients towards TDM (factor B: 0.6-0.7), weak TDM scientific evidence (factor C: 0.8), and TDM availability (factor D: -0.8). Respondents from low-/middle-income countries were less likely to frequently/almost always use TDM compared to high-income countries (9.4% vs. 21.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>TDM use for antipsychotics was poor and associated with limited knowledge and insufficient availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49358,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"342-351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European psychiatric association (EPA) - early career psychiatrists committee survey on trainees' and early-career psychiatrists' attitudes towards therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) use and utility during antipsychotic treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Schoretsanitis, Christoph U Correll, Agorastos Agorastos, Alejandro Compaired Sanchez, Gamze Erzin, Ruxandra M Grigoras, Mateja Grizelj Benussi, Tomasz M Gondek, Sinan Guloksuz, Mikkel Højlund, Stefan Jerotic, Ozge Kilic, Enita Metaj, Deshwinder Singh Sidhu, Nikolina Skandali, Aliaksei Skuhareuski, Marit Tveito, Rick P F Wolthusen, Egor Chumakov, Renato de Filippis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15622975.2024.2367138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This survey assessed psychiatry residents'/early-career psychiatrists' attitudes towards the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previously developed questionnaire on attitudes on TDM utility during antipsychotic treatment was cross-sectionally disseminated by national coordinators between 01/01/2022-31/12/2023. The frequency of using TDM for antipsychotics other than clozapine was the main outcome in a linear regression analysis, including sex, clinical setting, caseload, and factors generated by an exploratory factor analysis. Comparisons between residents and early-career psychiatrists, respondents working in in- and outpatient settings, and low-/middle- and high-income countries were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 1,237 respondents completed the survey, with 37.9% having never used TDM for antipsychotics. Seven factors explained 41% of response variance; six of them were associated with frequency of TDM use (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Items with highest loadings for factors included clinical benefits of TDM (factors A and E: 0.7), negative expectations for beliefs of patients towards TDM (factor B: 0.6-0.7), weak TDM scientific evidence (factor C: 0.8), and TDM availability (factor D: -0.8). Respondents from low-/middle-income countries were less likely to frequently/almost always use TDM compared to high-income countries (9.4% vs. 21.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>TDM use for antipsychotics was poor and associated with limited knowledge and insufficient availability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"342-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2024.2367138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2024.2367138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查目的本调查评估了精神科住院医师/早期职业精神科医师对抗精神病药物治疗药物监测(TDM)效用的态度:在 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日期间,国家协调员通过横截面方式分发了之前编制的关于抗精神病药物治疗过程中对 TDM 实用性的态度的调查问卷。在线性回归分析中,除氯氮平外,其他抗精神病药物使用TDM的频率是主要结果,包括性别、临床环境、病例数和探索性因素分析产生的因素。对住院医生和早期职业精神科医生、在住院和门诊环境中工作的受访者以及低收入/中等收入和高收入国家进行了比较:共有1237名受访者完成了调查,其中37.9%的受访者从未使用过抗精神病药物的TDM。七个因素解释了 41% 的回复方差;其中六个因素与 TDM 使用频率相关(p p 讨论):抗精神病药物的 TDM 使用情况不佳,与知识有限和供应不足有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The European psychiatric association (EPA) - early career psychiatrists committee survey on trainees' and early-career psychiatrists' attitudes towards therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) use and utility during antipsychotic treatment.

Objectives: This survey assessed psychiatry residents'/early-career psychiatrists' attitudes towards the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antipsychotics.

Methods: A previously developed questionnaire on attitudes on TDM utility during antipsychotic treatment was cross-sectionally disseminated by national coordinators between 01/01/2022-31/12/2023. The frequency of using TDM for antipsychotics other than clozapine was the main outcome in a linear regression analysis, including sex, clinical setting, caseload, and factors generated by an exploratory factor analysis. Comparisons between residents and early-career psychiatrists, respondents working in in- and outpatient settings, and low-/middle- and high-income countries were performed.

Results: Altogether, 1,237 respondents completed the survey, with 37.9% having never used TDM for antipsychotics. Seven factors explained 41% of response variance; six of them were associated with frequency of TDM use (p < 0.05). Items with highest loadings for factors included clinical benefits of TDM (factors A and E: 0.7), negative expectations for beliefs of patients towards TDM (factor B: 0.6-0.7), weak TDM scientific evidence (factor C: 0.8), and TDM availability (factor D: -0.8). Respondents from low-/middle-income countries were less likely to frequently/almost always use TDM compared to high-income countries (9.4% vs. 21.5%, p < 0.001).

Discussion: TDM use for antipsychotics was poor and associated with limited knowledge and insufficient availability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is to increase the worldwide communication of knowledge in clinical and basic research on biological psychiatry. Its target audience is thus clinical psychiatrists, educators, scientists and students interested in biological psychiatry. The composition of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry , with its diverse categories that allow communication of a great variety of information, ensures that it is of interest to a wide range of readers. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is a major clinically oriented journal on biological psychiatry. The opportunity to educate (through critical review papers, treatment guidelines and consensus reports), publish original work and observations (original papers and brief reports) and to express personal opinions (Letters to the Editor) makes The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry an extremely important medium in the field of biological psychiatry all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信