甲基化DNA标记物在诊断恶性胆道狭窄中的作用。

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000970
Matthew A Cooley, Amber R Schneider, Emily G Barr Fritcher, Dragana Milosevic, Michael J Levy, Amber R Bridgeman, John A Martin, Bret T Petersen, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Andrew C Storm, Ryan J Law, Eric J Vargas, Vishal Garimella, Tyler Zemla, Sarah M Jenkins, Jun Yin, Gregory J Gores, Lewis R Roberts, Benjamin R Kipp, Vinay Chandrasekhara
{"title":"甲基化DNA标记物在诊断恶性胆道狭窄中的作用。","authors":"Matthew A Cooley, Amber R Schneider, Emily G Barr Fritcher, Dragana Milosevic, Michael J Levy, Amber R Bridgeman, John A Martin, Bret T Petersen, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Andrew C Storm, Ryan J Law, Eric J Vargas, Vishal Garimella, Tyler Zemla, Sarah M Jenkins, Jun Yin, Gregory J Gores, Lewis R Roberts, Benjamin R Kipp, Vinay Chandrasekhara","doi":"10.1097/HEP.0000000000000970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Early identification of malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) is challenging, with up to 20% classified as indeterminants after preliminary testing and tissue sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We aimed to evaluate the use of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from biliary brushings to enhance MBS detection in a prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Candidate MDMs were evaluated for their utility in MBS diagnosis through a series of discovery and validation phases. DNA was extracted from biliary brushing samples, quantified, bisulfite-converted, and then subjected to methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.  Patients were considered to have no malignancy if the sampling was negative and there was no evidence of malignancy after 1 year or definitive negative surgical histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen candidate MDMs were evaluated in the discovery phase, with top-performing and new markers evaluated in the technical validation phase. The top 4 MDMs were TWIST1, HOXA1, VSTM2B, and CLEC11A, which individually achieved AUC values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.78, respectively, with sensitivities of 59.4%, 53.1%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, at high specificities for malignancy of 95.2%-95.3% for the final biologic validation phase. When combined as a panel, the AUC was 0.86, achieving 73.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, which outperformed cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The selected MDMs demonstrated improved performance characteristics for the detection of MBS compared to cytology and FISH. Therefore, MDMs should be considered viable candidates for inclusion in diagnostic testing algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":177,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"453-464"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of methylated DNA markers for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew A Cooley, Amber R Schneider, Emily G Barr Fritcher, Dragana Milosevic, Michael J Levy, Amber R Bridgeman, John A Martin, Bret T Petersen, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Andrew C Storm, Ryan J Law, Eric J Vargas, Vishal Garimella, Tyler Zemla, Sarah M Jenkins, Jun Yin, Gregory J Gores, Lewis R Roberts, Benjamin R Kipp, Vinay Chandrasekhara\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HEP.0000000000000970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Early identification of malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) is challenging, with up to 20% classified as indeterminants after preliminary testing and tissue sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We aimed to evaluate the use of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from biliary brushings to enhance MBS detection in a prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Candidate MDMs were evaluated for their utility in MBS diagnosis through a series of discovery and validation phases. DNA was extracted from biliary brushing samples, quantified, bisulfite-converted, and then subjected to methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.  Patients were considered to have no malignancy if the sampling was negative and there was no evidence of malignancy after 1 year or definitive negative surgical histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen candidate MDMs were evaluated in the discovery phase, with top-performing and new markers evaluated in the technical validation phase. The top 4 MDMs were TWIST1, HOXA1, VSTM2B, and CLEC11A, which individually achieved AUC values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.78, respectively, with sensitivities of 59.4%, 53.1%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, at high specificities for malignancy of 95.2%-95.3% for the final biologic validation phase. When combined as a panel, the AUC was 0.86, achieving 73.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, which outperformed cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The selected MDMs demonstrated improved performance characteristics for the detection of MBS compared to cytology and FISH. Therefore, MDMs should be considered viable candidates for inclusion in diagnostic testing algorithms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"453-464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000970\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000970","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:恶性胆道狭窄(MBS)的早期识别具有挑战性,经过内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的初步检测和组织取样后,高达20%的患者被归类为不确定患者。我们的目的是评估在前瞻性队列中使用胆道刷取物中的甲基化DNA标记物(MDM)来提高MBS的检测率:方法:通过一系列发现和验证阶段,对候选 MDM 在 MBS 诊断中的实用性进行评估。从胆道刷洗样本中提取DNA,进行定量、亚硫酸氢盐转化,然后进行甲基化特异性滴式数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)。如果取样结果为阴性,且一年后无恶性肿瘤证据或手术组织病理学结果为阴性,则认为患者无恶性肿瘤:在发现阶段评估了 14 个候选 MDM,在技术验证阶段评估了表现最好的标记物和新标记物。排名前四位的MDM分别是TWIST1、HOXA1、VSTM2B和CLEC11A,它们各自的AUC值分别为0.82、0.81、0.83和0.78,灵敏度分别为59.4%、53.1%、62.5%和50.0%,在最后的生物验证阶段,它们对恶性肿瘤的特异性高达95.2-95.3%。将甲基化DNA标记物组合成一个面板时,AUC为0.86,灵敏度为73.4%,特异度为92.9%,优于细胞学和荧光原位杂交(FISH):结论:与细胞学和荧光原位杂交相比,所选的甲基化DNA标记物在检测MBS方面表现出更好的性能特征。结论:与细胞学和荧光原位杂交(FISH)相比,所选的甲基化DNA标记物在检测MBS方面表现出更好的性能特征。因此,MDMs应被视为纳入诊断检测算法的可行候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of methylated DNA markers for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.

Background and aims: Early identification of malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) is challenging, with up to 20% classified as indeterminants after preliminary testing and tissue sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We aimed to evaluate the use of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from biliary brushings to enhance MBS detection in a prospective cohort.

Approach: Candidate MDMs were evaluated for their utility in MBS diagnosis through a series of discovery and validation phases. DNA was extracted from biliary brushing samples, quantified, bisulfite-converted, and then subjected to methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.  Patients were considered to have no malignancy if the sampling was negative and there was no evidence of malignancy after 1 year or definitive negative surgical histopathology.

Results: Fourteen candidate MDMs were evaluated in the discovery phase, with top-performing and new markers evaluated in the technical validation phase. The top 4 MDMs were TWIST1, HOXA1, VSTM2B, and CLEC11A, which individually achieved AUC values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.78, respectively, with sensitivities of 59.4%, 53.1%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, at high specificities for malignancy of 95.2%-95.3% for the final biologic validation phase. When combined as a panel, the AUC was 0.86, achieving 73.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, which outperformed cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Conclusions: The selected MDMs demonstrated improved performance characteristics for the detection of MBS compared to cytology and FISH. Therefore, MDMs should be considered viable candidates for inclusion in diagnostic testing algorithms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology
Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
609
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: HEPATOLOGY is recognized as the leading publication in the field of liver disease. It features original, peer-reviewed articles covering various aspects of liver structure, function, and disease. The journal's distinguished Editorial Board carefully selects the best articles each month, focusing on topics including immunology, chronic hepatitis, viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, genetic and metabolic liver diseases, liver cancer, and drug metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信