肺科医生在非小细胞肺癌精准医学生物标记物测试中的态度和作用。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.001
Adam H Fox, Mark A Rudzinski, Paul J Nietert, Gerard A Silvestri
{"title":"肺科医生在非小细胞肺癌精准医学生物标记物测试中的态度和作用。","authors":"Adam H Fox, Mark A Rudzinski, Paul J Nietert, Gerard A Silvestri","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarker testing for these therapies remains frequently underused, delayed, and inequitable. Pulmonologists often play a critical role in the initial diagnostic steps for patients with lung cancer, and previous data show variability in their knowledge and practices regarding biomarker testing. The purpose of this study is to better understand how pulmonologists view their role in lung cancer care.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>With the increasing importance of biomarker testing and precision medicine, how do pulmonologists view their role in lung cancer care?</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An electronic survey consisting of 31 items focused on attitudes and practices regarding diagnostic steps for NSCLC was randomly distributed to a sample of practicing pulmonologists in the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) analytics database. Inferential statistics were performed using χ<sup>2</sup> tests and multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 401 pulmonologists responded to the survey. Most (92%) were general pulmonologists, and more than one-half (62%) indicated they order biomarker testing. Longer practice tenure, higher case volumes, and participation in a multidisciplinary tumor board were associated with ordering biomarkers (P < .05). Pulmonology was identified to have the leading responsibility for the initial diagnostic biopsy by most respondents (83%) and less often for staging (45%), leading discussions about biomarker testing with patients (28%), and for ordering biomarkers (22%). The most common reasons for not ordering biomarkers included the following: oncology was responsible (84%), it was not within their scope of practice (46%), or lack of the necessary knowledge (51%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study shows that pulmonologists vary in their practices for ordering biomarkers, and many defer this responsibility to oncology. Despite the role of bronchoscopy and pulmonology societal guidelines for staging, many defer leadership of this process. Many pulmonologists lack the necessary resources and multidisciplinary infrastructure likely required to efficiently accomplish biomarker testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"1229-1238"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonologists' Attitudes and Role in Precision Medicine Biomarker Testing for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Adam H Fox, Mark A Rudzinski, Paul J Nietert, Gerard A Silvestri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarker testing for these therapies remains frequently underused, delayed, and inequitable. Pulmonologists often play a critical role in the initial diagnostic steps for patients with lung cancer, and previous data show variability in their knowledge and practices regarding biomarker testing. The purpose of this study is to better understand how pulmonologists view their role in lung cancer care.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>With the increasing importance of biomarker testing and precision medicine, how do pulmonologists view their role in lung cancer care?</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An electronic survey consisting of 31 items focused on attitudes and practices regarding diagnostic steps for NSCLC was randomly distributed to a sample of practicing pulmonologists in the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) analytics database. Inferential statistics were performed using χ<sup>2</sup> tests and multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 401 pulmonologists responded to the survey. Most (92%) were general pulmonologists, and more than one-half (62%) indicated they order biomarker testing. Longer practice tenure, higher case volumes, and participation in a multidisciplinary tumor board were associated with ordering biomarkers (P < .05). Pulmonology was identified to have the leading responsibility for the initial diagnostic biopsy by most respondents (83%) and less often for staging (45%), leading discussions about biomarker testing with patients (28%), and for ordering biomarkers (22%). The most common reasons for not ordering biomarkers included the following: oncology was responsible (84%), it was not within their scope of practice (46%), or lack of the necessary knowledge (51%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study shows that pulmonologists vary in their practices for ordering biomarkers, and many defer this responsibility to oncology. Despite the role of bronchoscopy and pulmonology societal guidelines for staging, many defer leadership of this process. Many pulmonologists lack the necessary resources and multidisciplinary infrastructure likely required to efficiently accomplish biomarker testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1229-1238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的精准医疗方面取得了进展,但这些疗法的生物标志物检测仍经常出现利用不足、延迟和不公平的情况。肺科医生通常在肺癌患者的初步诊断步骤中发挥着关键作用,而以往的数据显示,他们对生物标志物检测的认识和实践存在差异。本研究旨在更好地了解肺科医生如何看待他们在肺癌治疗中的作用:研究设计:我们向美国胸科医师学会(CHEST)分析数据库中的执业肺科医师样本随机发放了一份电子调查问卷,其中包括 31 个项目,主要涉及对 NSCLC 诊断步骤的态度和做法。采用Chi2检验和多变量逻辑回归模型进行推理统计:共有 401 名肺科医生回复了调查。大多数(92%)是普通肺科医生,超过一半(62%)表示他们会订购生物标记物检测。执业时间较长、病例量较大以及参加多学科肿瘤委员会与订购生物标记物有关(p解释:肺科医生订购生物标记物的做法各不相同,许多医生将这一责任推给肿瘤科。尽管支气管镜检查和肺科社会指南在分期方面发挥了作用,但许多人仍将这一过程的领导权推给了肺科医生。许多肺科医生缺乏有效完成生物标记物检测所需的必要资源和多学科基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonologists' Attitudes and Role in Precision Medicine Biomarker Testing for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Background: Despite advances in precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarker testing for these therapies remains frequently underused, delayed, and inequitable. Pulmonologists often play a critical role in the initial diagnostic steps for patients with lung cancer, and previous data show variability in their knowledge and practices regarding biomarker testing. The purpose of this study is to better understand how pulmonologists view their role in lung cancer care.

Research question: With the increasing importance of biomarker testing and precision medicine, how do pulmonologists view their role in lung cancer care?

Study design: An electronic survey consisting of 31 items focused on attitudes and practices regarding diagnostic steps for NSCLC was randomly distributed to a sample of practicing pulmonologists in the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) analytics database. Inferential statistics were performed using χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 401 pulmonologists responded to the survey. Most (92%) were general pulmonologists, and more than one-half (62%) indicated they order biomarker testing. Longer practice tenure, higher case volumes, and participation in a multidisciplinary tumor board were associated with ordering biomarkers (P < .05). Pulmonology was identified to have the leading responsibility for the initial diagnostic biopsy by most respondents (83%) and less often for staging (45%), leading discussions about biomarker testing with patients (28%), and for ordering biomarkers (22%). The most common reasons for not ordering biomarkers included the following: oncology was responsible (84%), it was not within their scope of practice (46%), or lack of the necessary knowledge (51%).

Interpretation: This study shows that pulmonologists vary in their practices for ordering biomarkers, and many defer this responsibility to oncology. Despite the role of bronchoscopy and pulmonology societal guidelines for staging, many defer leadership of this process. Many pulmonologists lack the necessary resources and multidisciplinary infrastructure likely required to efficiently accomplish biomarker testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信