优化剖面线间隔,提高岩石节理形态和剪切强度评估的准确性

IF 11.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING
{"title":"优化剖面线间隔,提高岩石节理形态和剪切强度评估的准确性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>2D profile lines play a critical role in cost-effectively evaluating rock joint properties and shear strength. However, the interval (Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em>) between these lines significantly impacts roughness and shear strength assessments. A detailed study of 45 joint samples using four statistical measures across 500 different Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> values identified a clear line interval effect with two stages: stable and fluctuation-discrete. Further statistical analysis showed a linear relationship between the error bounds of four parameters, shear strength evaluation, and their corresponding maximum Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> values, where the gradient <em>k</em> of this linear relationship was influenced by the basic friction angle and normal stress. Accounting for these factors, lower-limit linear models were employed to determine the optimal Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> values that met error tolerances (1%–10%) for all metrics and shear strength. The study also explored the consistent size effect on joints regardless of Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> changes, revealing three types of size effects based on morphological heterogeneity. Notably, larger joints required generally higher Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> to maintain the predefined error limits, suggesting an increased interval for large joint analyses. Consequently, this research provides a basis for determining the optimal Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em>, improving accuracy in 2D profile line assessments of joint characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48625,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mining Science and Technology","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 587-608"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268624000582/pdfft?md5=50a2741c0b48f9453ec408ea25c6f4e5&pid=1-s2.0-S2095268624000582-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing profile line interval for enhanced accuracy in rock joint morphology and shear strength assessments\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.04.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>2D profile lines play a critical role in cost-effectively evaluating rock joint properties and shear strength. However, the interval (Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em>) between these lines significantly impacts roughness and shear strength assessments. A detailed study of 45 joint samples using four statistical measures across 500 different Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> values identified a clear line interval effect with two stages: stable and fluctuation-discrete. Further statistical analysis showed a linear relationship between the error bounds of four parameters, shear strength evaluation, and their corresponding maximum Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> values, where the gradient <em>k</em> of this linear relationship was influenced by the basic friction angle and normal stress. Accounting for these factors, lower-limit linear models were employed to determine the optimal Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> values that met error tolerances (1%–10%) for all metrics and shear strength. The study also explored the consistent size effect on joints regardless of Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> changes, revealing three types of size effects based on morphological heterogeneity. Notably, larger joints required generally higher Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em> to maintain the predefined error limits, suggesting an increased interval for large joint analyses. Consequently, this research provides a basis for determining the optimal Δ<em>I<sub>L</sub></em>, improving accuracy in 2D profile line assessments of joint characteristics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mining Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 587-608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268624000582/pdfft?md5=50a2741c0b48f9453ec408ea25c6f4e5&pid=1-s2.0-S2095268624000582-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mining Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268624000582\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mining Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268624000582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二维剖面线在经济有效地评估岩石节理特性和抗剪强度方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,这些剖面线之间的间隔(Δ)会对粗糙度和抗剪强度评估产生重大影响。对 45 个节理样本进行了详细研究,使用四种统计量对 500 个不同的 Δ 值进行了分析,发现了明显的线间隔效应,分为两个阶段:稳定阶段和波动-离散阶段。进一步的统计分析显示,剪切强度评估的四个参数的误差边界与相应的最大 Δ 值之间存在线性关系,这种线性关系的梯度受基本摩擦角和法向应力的影响。考虑到这些因素,采用了下限线性模型来确定最佳 Δ 值,以满足所有指标和剪切强度的误差容限(1%-10%)。研究还探讨了无论 Δ 如何变化,尺寸对接头的一致影响,揭示了基于形态异质性的三种尺寸影响。值得注意的是,较大的关节一般需要较高的Δ来维持预定义误差限值,这表明大关节分析的间隔时间会增加。因此,这项研究为确定最佳 Δ 提供了依据,从而提高了二维剖面线评估关节特征的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing profile line interval for enhanced accuracy in rock joint morphology and shear strength assessments

2D profile lines play a critical role in cost-effectively evaluating rock joint properties and shear strength. However, the interval (ΔIL) between these lines significantly impacts roughness and shear strength assessments. A detailed study of 45 joint samples using four statistical measures across 500 different ΔIL values identified a clear line interval effect with two stages: stable and fluctuation-discrete. Further statistical analysis showed a linear relationship between the error bounds of four parameters, shear strength evaluation, and their corresponding maximum ΔIL values, where the gradient k of this linear relationship was influenced by the basic friction angle and normal stress. Accounting for these factors, lower-limit linear models were employed to determine the optimal ΔIL values that met error tolerances (1%–10%) for all metrics and shear strength. The study also explored the consistent size effect on joints regardless of ΔIL changes, revealing three types of size effects based on morphological heterogeneity. Notably, larger joints required generally higher ΔIL to maintain the predefined error limits, suggesting an increased interval for large joint analyses. Consequently, this research provides a basis for determining the optimal ΔIL, improving accuracy in 2D profile line assessments of joint characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
2541
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, founded in 1990 as the Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, is a monthly English-language journal. It publishes original research papers and high-quality reviews that explore the latest advancements in theories, methodologies, and applications within the realm of mining sciences and technologies. The journal serves as an international exchange forum for readers and authors worldwide involved in mining sciences and technologies. All papers undergo a peer-review process and meticulous editing by specialists and authorities, with the entire submission-to-publication process conducted electronically.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信