{"title":"用于短期太阳辐照度预测的天空图像:线性机器学习模型比较研究","authors":"Elham Shirazi;Ivan Gordon;Angele Reinders;Francky Catthoor","doi":"10.1109/JPHOTOV.2024.3398365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An accurate solar irradiance forecast is critical to the reliable operation of electrical grids with increasing integration of photovoltaic systems. This study compares short-term solar irradiance forecasts based on sky images using seven different linear machine learning algorithms. In the first step, several features are extracted from sky images, reconstructed, and next used as exogenous inputs to seven machine learning algorithms, i.e., linear regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression, ridge regression, Bayesian ridge (BR) regression, stochastic gradient descent (SGD), generalized linear model (GLM) regression, and random sample consensus (RANSAC). A representative dataset of three years of sky images with 1-minute resolution from 2014 to 2016 serves for comparison together with the clear sky indexes as inputs to forecast ground-level solar radiances for up to 30 minutes ahead. The results of the abovementioned algorithms are compared, where for 5 and 10 minutes ahead, Lasso has the highest accuracy with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.05 and 0.062 kW/m\n<sup>2</sup>\n, while for 15 to 30 minutes ahead, stochastic gradient descent provides the most accurate forecast with an RMSE of 0.067, 0.071, 0.074, and 0.076 kW/m\n<sup>2</sup>\n for 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes ahead horizons, respectively. For all the time horizons, Bayesian ridge is among the three most accurate models, and RANSAC has the highest error. The results show that ground-level solar irradiance can be forecasted with a relatively low average instantaneous error ranging from 0.05 to 0.1 kW/m\n<sup>2</sup>\n depending on the model and forecasting horizon without imposing a too high execution time overhead, namely, less than 7 s. The accuracy of the forecast can be improved if combined with cloud detection algorithms. Overall, ridge, Bayesian ridge, and stochastic gradient descent provide more accurate forecasts for short-term horizons.","PeriodicalId":445,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics","volume":"14 4","pages":"691-698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sky Images for Short-Term Solar Irradiance Forecast: A Comparative Study of Linear Machine Learning Models\",\"authors\":\"Elham Shirazi;Ivan Gordon;Angele Reinders;Francky Catthoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JPHOTOV.2024.3398365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An accurate solar irradiance forecast is critical to the reliable operation of electrical grids with increasing integration of photovoltaic systems. This study compares short-term solar irradiance forecasts based on sky images using seven different linear machine learning algorithms. In the first step, several features are extracted from sky images, reconstructed, and next used as exogenous inputs to seven machine learning algorithms, i.e., linear regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression, ridge regression, Bayesian ridge (BR) regression, stochastic gradient descent (SGD), generalized linear model (GLM) regression, and random sample consensus (RANSAC). A representative dataset of three years of sky images with 1-minute resolution from 2014 to 2016 serves for comparison together with the clear sky indexes as inputs to forecast ground-level solar radiances for up to 30 minutes ahead. The results of the abovementioned algorithms are compared, where for 5 and 10 minutes ahead, Lasso has the highest accuracy with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.05 and 0.062 kW/m\\n<sup>2</sup>\\n, while for 15 to 30 minutes ahead, stochastic gradient descent provides the most accurate forecast with an RMSE of 0.067, 0.071, 0.074, and 0.076 kW/m\\n<sup>2</sup>\\n for 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes ahead horizons, respectively. For all the time horizons, Bayesian ridge is among the three most accurate models, and RANSAC has the highest error. The results show that ground-level solar irradiance can be forecasted with a relatively low average instantaneous error ranging from 0.05 to 0.1 kW/m\\n<sup>2</sup>\\n depending on the model and forecasting horizon without imposing a too high execution time overhead, namely, less than 7 s. The accuracy of the forecast can be improved if combined with cloud detection algorithms. Overall, ridge, Bayesian ridge, and stochastic gradient descent provide more accurate forecasts for short-term horizons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"691-698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10550923/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10550923/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sky Images for Short-Term Solar Irradiance Forecast: A Comparative Study of Linear Machine Learning Models
An accurate solar irradiance forecast is critical to the reliable operation of electrical grids with increasing integration of photovoltaic systems. This study compares short-term solar irradiance forecasts based on sky images using seven different linear machine learning algorithms. In the first step, several features are extracted from sky images, reconstructed, and next used as exogenous inputs to seven machine learning algorithms, i.e., linear regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression, ridge regression, Bayesian ridge (BR) regression, stochastic gradient descent (SGD), generalized linear model (GLM) regression, and random sample consensus (RANSAC). A representative dataset of three years of sky images with 1-minute resolution from 2014 to 2016 serves for comparison together with the clear sky indexes as inputs to forecast ground-level solar radiances for up to 30 minutes ahead. The results of the abovementioned algorithms are compared, where for 5 and 10 minutes ahead, Lasso has the highest accuracy with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.05 and 0.062 kW/m
2
, while for 15 to 30 minutes ahead, stochastic gradient descent provides the most accurate forecast with an RMSE of 0.067, 0.071, 0.074, and 0.076 kW/m
2
for 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes ahead horizons, respectively. For all the time horizons, Bayesian ridge is among the three most accurate models, and RANSAC has the highest error. The results show that ground-level solar irradiance can be forecasted with a relatively low average instantaneous error ranging from 0.05 to 0.1 kW/m
2
depending on the model and forecasting horizon without imposing a too high execution time overhead, namely, less than 7 s. The accuracy of the forecast can be improved if combined with cloud detection algorithms. Overall, ridge, Bayesian ridge, and stochastic gradient descent provide more accurate forecasts for short-term horizons.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics is a peer-reviewed, archival publication reporting original and significant research results that advance the field of photovoltaics (PV). The PV field is diverse in its science base ranging from semiconductor and PV device physics to optics and the materials sciences. The journal publishes articles that connect this science base to PV science and technology. The intent is to publish original research results that are of primary interest to the photovoltaic specialist. The scope of the IEEE J. Photovoltaics incorporates: fundamentals and new concepts of PV conversion, including those based on nanostructured materials, low-dimensional physics, multiple charge generation, up/down converters, thermophotovoltaics, hot-carrier effects, plasmonics, metamorphic materials, luminescent concentrators, and rectennas; Si-based PV, including new cell designs, crystalline and non-crystalline Si, passivation, characterization and Si crystal growth; polycrystalline, amorphous and crystalline thin-film solar cell materials, including PV structures and solar cells based on II-VI, chalcopyrite, Si and other thin film absorbers; III-V PV materials, heterostructures, multijunction devices and concentrator PV; optics for light trapping, reflection control and concentration; organic PV including polymer, hybrid and dye sensitized solar cells; space PV including cell materials and PV devices, defects and reliability, environmental effects and protective materials; PV modeling and characterization methods; and other aspects of PV, including modules, power conditioning, inverters, balance-of-systems components, monitoring, analyses and simulations, and supporting PV module standards and measurements. Tutorial and review papers on these subjects are also published and occasionally special issues are published to treat particular areas in more depth and breadth.