在初级保健中安全去除青霉素过敏标签的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
{"title":"在初级保健中安全去除青霉素过敏标签的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ten percent of the population is labeled as allergic to penicillin(s), when in fact 90% of these labels are inappropriate. Recent studies have shown that inpatient delabeling by a direct drug challenge (dDC) is safe in low-risk patients. However, there is a need for outpatient and nonallergist delabeling.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the safety of delabeling low-risk adults by means of dDC in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 15, 2022 (updated June 5, 2023) for studies performing dDC in adults in primary care or other outpatient settings. Two researchers independently screened studies for eligibility. The data extraction and critical appraisal were performed by 1 reviewer, and we pooled the results in a meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>Of 2138 results, 12 studies (1070 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies evaluated delabeling in primary care and 9 studies in an outpatient hospital setting. There were no critical </span>adverse events during dDC. No reaction occurred in 97.13% of the 1070 patients, who previously labeled as penicillin-allergic, and were safely delabeled. Ten patients (&lt;1%) developed an immediate reaction: 3 had self-limiting reactions and 7 needed </span>antihistaminics<span>, steroids, epinephrine, and/or salbutamol.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>No serious allergic reactions are observed during direct </span>amoxicillin<span> challenge in adults in an outpatient setting. However, with the exception of 1 recent report, these studies are of low to moderate quality. Nonspecialist delabeling is promising, but further research is required on correct risk stratification<span> and safety assessment in large cohort studies evaluating dDC in primary care.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Penicillin Allergy Delabeling in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.06.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ten percent of the population is labeled as allergic to penicillin(s), when in fact 90% of these labels are inappropriate. Recent studies have shown that inpatient delabeling by a direct drug challenge (dDC) is safe in low-risk patients. However, there is a need for outpatient and nonallergist delabeling.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the safety of delabeling low-risk adults by means of dDC in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 15, 2022 (updated June 5, 2023) for studies performing dDC in adults in primary care or other outpatient settings. Two researchers independently screened studies for eligibility. The data extraction and critical appraisal were performed by 1 reviewer, and we pooled the results in a meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>Of 2138 results, 12 studies (1070 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies evaluated delabeling in primary care and 9 studies in an outpatient hospital setting. There were no critical </span>adverse events during dDC. No reaction occurred in 97.13% of the 1070 patients, who previously labeled as penicillin-allergic, and were safely delabeled. Ten patients (&lt;1%) developed an immediate reaction: 3 had self-limiting reactions and 7 needed </span>antihistaminics<span>, steroids, epinephrine, and/or salbutamol.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>No serious allergic reactions are observed during direct </span>amoxicillin<span> challenge in adults in an outpatient setting. However, with the exception of 1 recent report, these studies are of low to moderate quality. Nonspecialist delabeling is promising, but further research is required on correct risk stratification<span> and safety assessment in large cohort studies evaluating dDC in primary care.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219824006408\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219824006408","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:10%的人被贴上了对青霉素过敏的标签,而实际上这些标签中有 90% 是不恰当的。最近的研究表明,住院病人通过直接药物挑战(dDC)来消除标签对低风险病人是安全的。然而,门诊病人和非过敏专科医生仍有必要进行去标签治疗:目的:评估在初级保健中通过直接药物挑战对低风险成人进行去标签的安全性:我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Conchrane Library 数据库中从开始到 2022 年 3 月 15 日(更新日期为 2023 年 6 月 5 日)在初级保健或其他门诊环境中对成人进行 dDC 的研究。两名研究人员独立筛选符合条件的研究。数据提取和批判性评估由一名审稿人完成,我们将结果汇总后进行了荟萃分析:在 2 138 项研究结果中,有 12 项研究(1070 名参与者)符合纳入条件。其中 3 项研究评估了基层医疗机构的去标记化情况,9 项研究评估了医院门诊的去标记化情况。去标记化过程中未发生严重不良事件。在 1070 名曾被标记为青霉素过敏的患者中,97.13% 的患者未发生任何反应,并安全地解除了标记。10 名患者(结论:在直接抗生素治疗过程中未观察到严重的过敏反应:在门诊环境中对成人进行阿莫西林直接挑战时未发现严重的过敏反应。然而,除一份最新报告外,这些研究的质量都处于中下水平。非专科医生的脱敏治疗很有前景,但还需要进一步研究如何在大型队列研究中对基层医疗机构的脱敏治疗进行正确的风险分层和安全评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safe Penicillin Allergy Delabeling in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Ten percent of the population is labeled as allergic to penicillin(s), when in fact 90% of these labels are inappropriate. Recent studies have shown that inpatient delabeling by a direct drug challenge (dDC) is safe in low-risk patients. However, there is a need for outpatient and nonallergist delabeling.

Objective

To assess the safety of delabeling low-risk adults by means of dDC in primary care.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 15, 2022 (updated June 5, 2023) for studies performing dDC in adults in primary care or other outpatient settings. Two researchers independently screened studies for eligibility. The data extraction and critical appraisal were performed by 1 reviewer, and we pooled the results in a meta-analysis.

Results

Of 2138 results, 12 studies (1070 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies evaluated delabeling in primary care and 9 studies in an outpatient hospital setting. There were no critical adverse events during dDC. No reaction occurred in 97.13% of the 1070 patients, who previously labeled as penicillin-allergic, and were safely delabeled. Ten patients (<1%) developed an immediate reaction: 3 had self-limiting reactions and 7 needed antihistaminics, steroids, epinephrine, and/or salbutamol.

Conclusions

No serious allergic reactions are observed during direct amoxicillin challenge in adults in an outpatient setting. However, with the exception of 1 recent report, these studies are of low to moderate quality. Nonspecialist delabeling is promising, but further research is required on correct risk stratification and safety assessment in large cohort studies evaluating dDC in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信