以家庭为基础的动机访谈和资源动员预防肥胖症:共同美好生活试验。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"以家庭为基础的动机访谈和资源动员预防肥胖症:共同美好生活试验。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Test an obesity intervention for families with low incomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 208 families were included (a parent with a body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 and a child aged 6–12 years). A 12-month randomized controlled trial combining family health coaching (motivational interviewing) and connection to community resources. Comparison group: referrals for basic needs, written educational materials. Questionnaires, accelerometry, and anthropometrics. Intention-to-treat analysis of change in outcomes. Two-sided t test with multiple imputation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Parents were 95% female, 31% Black, and 27% Hispanic. Children had a mean BMI-Z score of 1.15. Primary outcomes did not differ between groups at 12 months. Both groups significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) improved on the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity Scale for behaviors related to childhood obesity (mean ± SE: comparison, 2.8 ± 1.0; intervention, 2.2 ± 0.9), increased child sedentary activity (comparison, 32.5 ± 12.1; intervention, 39.9 ± 12.4 min/d), and decreased child moderate-vigorous physical activity (comparison, −9.6 ± 3.3; intervention −7.0 ± 3.0 min/d). Parents had no change in BMI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>We successfully embedded screening and referral to address social needs within an obesity intervention. The coaching intervention did not provide additional benefits. Future research could explore ways to make these interventions more accessible, valuable, and effective for families.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624003270/pdfft?md5=f4f3146b91ee6b7addd03ebe1ae9af06&pid=1-s2.0-S1499404624003270-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family-Based Motivational Interviewing and Resource Mobilization to Prevent Obesity: Living Well Together Trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Test an obesity intervention for families with low incomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 208 families were included (a parent with a body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 and a child aged 6–12 years). A 12-month randomized controlled trial combining family health coaching (motivational interviewing) and connection to community resources. Comparison group: referrals for basic needs, written educational materials. Questionnaires, accelerometry, and anthropometrics. Intention-to-treat analysis of change in outcomes. Two-sided t test with multiple imputation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Parents were 95% female, 31% Black, and 27% Hispanic. Children had a mean BMI-Z score of 1.15. Primary outcomes did not differ between groups at 12 months. Both groups significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) improved on the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity Scale for behaviors related to childhood obesity (mean ± SE: comparison, 2.8 ± 1.0; intervention, 2.2 ± 0.9), increased child sedentary activity (comparison, 32.5 ± 12.1; intervention, 39.9 ± 12.4 min/d), and decreased child moderate-vigorous physical activity (comparison, −9.6 ± 3.3; intervention −7.0 ± 3.0 min/d). Parents had no change in BMI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>We successfully embedded screening and referral to address social needs within an obesity intervention. The coaching intervention did not provide additional benefits. Future research could explore ways to make these interventions more accessible, valuable, and effective for families.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624003270/pdfft?md5=f4f3146b91ee6b7addd03ebe1ae9af06&pid=1-s2.0-S1499404624003270-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624003270\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624003270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:测试针对低收入家庭的肥胖干预措施:测试针对低收入家庭的肥胖干预措施:共纳入 208 个家庭(体重指数[BMI]≥ 30 的父母和 6-12 岁的孩子)。这是一项为期 12 个月的随机对照试验,结合了家庭健康指导(动机访谈)和社区资源连接。对比组:基本需求转介、书面教育材料。问卷调查、加速度测量和人体测量。对结果变化进行意向治疗分析。结果:95%的家长为女性,31%为黑人,27%为西班牙裔。儿童的平均 BMI-Z 评分为 1.15。各组在 12 个月时的主要结果无差异。在与儿童肥胖有关的行为方面,两组的家庭营养和体育活动量表都有明显改善(P < 0.05)(平均值 ± SE:对比组,2.8 ± 1.0;干预组,2.2 ± 0.9),儿童久坐活动增加(对比组,32.5 ± 12.1;干预组,39.9 ± 12.4 min/d),儿童中等强度体育活动减少(对比组,-9.6 ± 3.3;干预组,-7.0 ± 3.0 min/d)。家长的体重指数没有变化:我们成功地将筛查和转介纳入了肥胖干预措施,以满足社会需求。辅导干预并未带来额外的益处。未来的研究可以探索如何使这些干预措施对家庭更方便、更有价值和更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family-Based Motivational Interviewing and Resource Mobilization to Prevent Obesity: Living Well Together Trial

Objective

Test an obesity intervention for families with low incomes.

Methods

A total of 208 families were included (a parent with a body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 and a child aged 6–12 years). A 12-month randomized controlled trial combining family health coaching (motivational interviewing) and connection to community resources. Comparison group: referrals for basic needs, written educational materials. Questionnaires, accelerometry, and anthropometrics. Intention-to-treat analysis of change in outcomes. Two-sided t test with multiple imputation.

Results

Parents were 95% female, 31% Black, and 27% Hispanic. Children had a mean BMI-Z score of 1.15. Primary outcomes did not differ between groups at 12 months. Both groups significantly (P < 0.05) improved on the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity Scale for behaviors related to childhood obesity (mean ± SE: comparison, 2.8 ± 1.0; intervention, 2.2 ± 0.9), increased child sedentary activity (comparison, 32.5 ± 12.1; intervention, 39.9 ± 12.4 min/d), and decreased child moderate-vigorous physical activity (comparison, −9.6 ± 3.3; intervention −7.0 ± 3.0 min/d). Parents had no change in BMI.

Conclusions and Implications

We successfully embedded screening and referral to address social needs within an obesity intervention. The coaching intervention did not provide additional benefits. Future research could explore ways to make these interventions more accessible, valuable, and effective for families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信