I 期胃癌远端和幽门保留胃切除术后的长期生活质量:一项前瞻性多机构研究(CCOG1601)。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Chie Tanaka, Mitsuro Kanda, Kazunari Misawa, Yoshinari Mochizuki, Takuya Watanabe, Masashi Hattori, Kiyoshi Ishigure, Satoshi Sueoka, Hitoshi Teramoto, Akiharu Ishiyama, Ikue Nonogaki, Hidenobu Matsushita, Kenta Murotani, Yasuhiro Kodera
{"title":"I 期胃癌远端和幽门保留胃切除术后的长期生活质量:一项前瞻性多机构研究(CCOG1601)。","authors":"Chie Tanaka, Mitsuro Kanda, Kazunari Misawa, Yoshinari Mochizuki, Takuya Watanabe, Masashi Hattori, Kiyoshi Ishigure, Satoshi Sueoka, Hitoshi Teramoto, Akiharu Ishiyama, Ikue Nonogaki, Hidenobu Matsushita, Kenta Murotani, Yasuhiro Kodera","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02881-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While regarded as function-preserving gastrectomy, few prospective longitudinal clinical trials have addressed the postoperative quality of life (QOL) after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG). We prospectively compared chronological changes in postoperative body weight and the QOL between PPG and distal gastrectomy (DG) for pathological Stage I gastric cancer (GC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-institutional prospective study (CCOG1601) to evaluate patients who underwent DG and PPG. The QOL was examined using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37). A total of 295 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions, and propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the essential variables for comparison analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 25 pairs of patients were identified. In the first postoperative month, DG achieved a superior nausea and vomiting score (EORTC QLQ-C30) and meal-related distress, indigestion, and dumping scores (PGSAS-37). No significant differences were noted between DG and PPG in the long-term QOL. Postoperative body weight loss was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective observational study failed to demonstrate the superiority of PPG over DG in terms of postoperative body weight changes and the QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The long-term quality of life after distal and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: A prospective multi-institutional study (CCOG1601).\",\"authors\":\"Chie Tanaka, Mitsuro Kanda, Kazunari Misawa, Yoshinari Mochizuki, Takuya Watanabe, Masashi Hattori, Kiyoshi Ishigure, Satoshi Sueoka, Hitoshi Teramoto, Akiharu Ishiyama, Ikue Nonogaki, Hidenobu Matsushita, Kenta Murotani, Yasuhiro Kodera\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-024-02881-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While regarded as function-preserving gastrectomy, few prospective longitudinal clinical trials have addressed the postoperative quality of life (QOL) after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG). We prospectively compared chronological changes in postoperative body weight and the QOL between PPG and distal gastrectomy (DG) for pathological Stage I gastric cancer (GC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-institutional prospective study (CCOG1601) to evaluate patients who underwent DG and PPG. The QOL was examined using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37). A total of 295 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions, and propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the essential variables for comparison analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 25 pairs of patients were identified. In the first postoperative month, DG achieved a superior nausea and vomiting score (EORTC QLQ-C30) and meal-related distress, indigestion, and dumping scores (PGSAS-37). No significant differences were noted between DG and PPG in the long-term QOL. Postoperative body weight loss was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective observational study failed to demonstrate the superiority of PPG over DG in terms of postoperative body weight changes and the QOL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02881-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02881-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然幽门保留胃切除术(PPG)被认为是保留功能的胃切除术,但很少有前瞻性纵向临床试验涉及幽门保留胃切除术(PPG)术后的生活质量(QOL)。我们前瞻性地比较了病理Ⅰ期胃癌(GC)幽门胃切除术和远端胃切除术(DG)术后体重和 QOL 的时间变化:我们开展了一项多机构前瞻性研究(CCOG1601),对接受 DG 和 PPG 的患者进行评估。我们使用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷-C30(EORTC QLQ-C30)和胃切除术后综合征评估量表-37(PGSAS-37)对患者的生活质量进行了评估。15家机构共招募了295名患者,并进行了倾向得分匹配,以调整比较分析的基本变量:结果:经过倾向得分匹配,确定了 25 对患者。在术后第一个月,DG 的恶心和呕吐评分(EORTC QLQ-C30)以及与进餐相关的不适、消化不良和呕吐评分(PGSAS-37)均优于 DG。在长期 QOL 方面,DG 和 PPG 之间无明显差异。两组患者的术后体重减轻情况相似:这项前瞻性观察研究未能证明 PPG 在术后体重变化和 QOL 方面优于 DG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The long-term quality of life after distal and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: A prospective multi-institutional study (CCOG1601).

The long-term quality of life after distal and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: A prospective multi-institutional study (CCOG1601).

Purpose: While regarded as function-preserving gastrectomy, few prospective longitudinal clinical trials have addressed the postoperative quality of life (QOL) after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG). We prospectively compared chronological changes in postoperative body weight and the QOL between PPG and distal gastrectomy (DG) for pathological Stage I gastric cancer (GC).

Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional prospective study (CCOG1601) to evaluate patients who underwent DG and PPG. The QOL was examined using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37). A total of 295 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions, and propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the essential variables for comparison analyses.

Results: After propensity score matching, 25 pairs of patients were identified. In the first postoperative month, DG achieved a superior nausea and vomiting score (EORTC QLQ-C30) and meal-related distress, indigestion, and dumping scores (PGSAS-37). No significant differences were noted between DG and PPG in the long-term QOL. Postoperative body weight loss was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: This prospective observational study failed to demonstrate the superiority of PPG over DG in terms of postoperative body weight changes and the QOL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信