开放式和机器人输尿管肠管狭窄修复术:早期疗效和并发症。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0021
Elizabeth N Bearrick, Bridget L Findlay, Anthony Fadel, Aaron M Potretzke, Katherine T Anderson, Boyd R Viers
{"title":"开放式和机器人输尿管肠管狭窄修复术:早期疗效和并发症。","authors":"Elizabeth N Bearrick, Bridget L Findlay, Anthony Fadel, Aaron M Potretzke, Katherine T Anderson, Boyd R Viers","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To characterize our single institutional experience with robotic and open uretero-enteric stricture (UES) repair. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We queried our ureteral reconstructive database for UES repair between 01/2017 and 10/2023. Patients with <3 months follow-up were excluded. Prior to surgery, patients underwent ureteral rest (4 weeks) with conversion to nephrostomy tube. Clinical characteristics, complications, reconstructive success (uretero-enteric patency), need for repeat intervention, and renal function were assessed in patients undergoing open and robotic UES reconstruction. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 50 patients undergoing UES repair during the study period, 45 were included for analysis due to complete follow-up (34 [76%] robotic and 11 [24%] open repair). UES repair was performed in 50 renal units a median of 13 months (interquartile range 7-30) from index surgery, and most often involved the left renal unit (34/50; 68%). Compared with robotic, open cases were significantly more likely to have undergone open cystectomy (100% <i>vs</i> 68%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), have longer strictures (median 4 <i>vs</i> 1 cm, <i>p</i> < 0.001), require tissue substitution (27% <i>vs</i> 3%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), and have lengthier postoperative hospitalization (5 <i>vs</i> 2 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in total operative time (410 <i>vs</i> 322 minutes) or 30d major complications (18% <i>vs</i> 21%). At a follow-up of 13 months, per patient reconstructive success was 100% (11/11) for open and 97% (33/34) for robotic, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In select patients with short UES unlikely to require advanced reconstructive techniques, a robotic-assisted approach can be considered. Careful patient selection is associated with limited morbidity and high reconstructive success.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open and Robotic Uretero-enteric Stricture Repair: Early Outcomes and Complications.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth N Bearrick, Bridget L Findlay, Anthony Fadel, Aaron M Potretzke, Katherine T Anderson, Boyd R Viers\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2024.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To characterize our single institutional experience with robotic and open uretero-enteric stricture (UES) repair. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We queried our ureteral reconstructive database for UES repair between 01/2017 and 10/2023. Patients with <3 months follow-up were excluded. Prior to surgery, patients underwent ureteral rest (4 weeks) with conversion to nephrostomy tube. Clinical characteristics, complications, reconstructive success (uretero-enteric patency), need for repeat intervention, and renal function were assessed in patients undergoing open and robotic UES reconstruction. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 50 patients undergoing UES repair during the study period, 45 were included for analysis due to complete follow-up (34 [76%] robotic and 11 [24%] open repair). UES repair was performed in 50 renal units a median of 13 months (interquartile range 7-30) from index surgery, and most often involved the left renal unit (34/50; 68%). Compared with robotic, open cases were significantly more likely to have undergone open cystectomy (100% <i>vs</i> 68%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), have longer strictures (median 4 <i>vs</i> 1 cm, <i>p</i> < 0.001), require tissue substitution (27% <i>vs</i> 3%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), and have lengthier postoperative hospitalization (5 <i>vs</i> 2 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in total operative time (410 <i>vs</i> 322 minutes) or 30d major complications (18% <i>vs</i> 21%). At a follow-up of 13 months, per patient reconstructive success was 100% (11/11) for open and 97% (33/34) for robotic, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In select patients with short UES unlikely to require advanced reconstructive techniques, a robotic-assisted approach can be considered. Careful patient selection is associated with limited morbidity and high reconstructive success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要总结我们单个机构在机器人和开放式输尿管肠管狭窄(UES)修复方面的经验:我们在输尿管重建数据库中查询了 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间的 UES 修复情况。随访<3个月的患者被排除在外。手术前,患者进行了输尿管休息(4周),并转换为肾造瘘管。对接受开放式和机器人输尿管ES重建术的患者的临床特征、并发症、重建成功率(输尿管-肠管通畅率)、重复干预需求和肾功能进行了评估:在研究期间接受 UES 修复术的 50 名患者中,有 45 人因随访完整而纳入分析(34 人[76%]接受机器人修复术,11 人[24%]接受开放式修复术)。在50个肾单位进行了UES修复术,中位时间为手术后13个月(IQR 7-30),最常涉及的是左肾单位(34/50;68%)。与机器人手术相比,开放手术病例更有可能接受过开放性膀胱切除术(100% vs 68%,P=0.04),狭窄时间更长(中位 4 cm vs 1 cm,P=0.04):对于一些不太需要先进重建技术的短膀胱尿道患者,可以考虑采用机器人辅助方法。对患者的精心选择可降低发病率,提高重建成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open and Robotic Uretero-enteric Stricture Repair: Early Outcomes and Complications.

Objective: To characterize our single institutional experience with robotic and open uretero-enteric stricture (UES) repair. Materials and Methods: We queried our ureteral reconstructive database for UES repair between 01/2017 and 10/2023. Patients with <3 months follow-up were excluded. Prior to surgery, patients underwent ureteral rest (4 weeks) with conversion to nephrostomy tube. Clinical characteristics, complications, reconstructive success (uretero-enteric patency), need for repeat intervention, and renal function were assessed in patients undergoing open and robotic UES reconstruction. Results: Of 50 patients undergoing UES repair during the study period, 45 were included for analysis due to complete follow-up (34 [76%] robotic and 11 [24%] open repair). UES repair was performed in 50 renal units a median of 13 months (interquartile range 7-30) from index surgery, and most often involved the left renal unit (34/50; 68%). Compared with robotic, open cases were significantly more likely to have undergone open cystectomy (100% vs 68%, p = 0.04), have longer strictures (median 4 vs 1 cm, p < 0.001), require tissue substitution (27% vs 3%, p = 0.04), and have lengthier postoperative hospitalization (5 vs 2 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in total operative time (410 vs 322 minutes) or 30d major complications (18% vs 21%). At a follow-up of 13 months, per patient reconstructive success was 100% (11/11) for open and 97% (33/34) for robotic, respectively. Conclusion: In select patients with short UES unlikely to require advanced reconstructive techniques, a robotic-assisted approach can be considered. Careful patient selection is associated with limited morbidity and high reconstructive success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信