CMV-NCMV 碰撞事故中驾驶员故障应急响应行为的影响因素分析

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Panyi Wei, Jianling Huang, Yanyan Chen, Jianming Ma, Yunchao Zhang, Shaohua Wang, Ning Chen
{"title":"CMV-NCMV 碰撞事故中驾驶员故障应急响应行为的影响因素分析","authors":"Panyi Wei,&nbsp;Jianling Huang,&nbsp;Yanyan Chen,&nbsp;Jianming Ma,&nbsp;Yunchao Zhang,&nbsp;Shaohua Wang,&nbsp;Ning Chen","doi":"10.1155/2024/3606205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Drivers’ fault emergency response behavior can easily lead to crashes, resulting in significant economic and property losses. Exploring the causes of improper emergency response behavior is crucial for regulating driver behavior and preventing crash. Therefore, based on crashes data between commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) and noncommercial motor vehicles (NCMVs) that occurred in China from 2014 to 2018, this study established a binary logistic regression model. It systematically analyzed the key factors influencing drivers’ fault emergency response behaviors in terms of individuals, vehicles, road conditions, environment, and corporate management. Additionally, it compared the differences in the influencing factors of fault emergency response behaviors between drivers of CMV and NCMV. The results indicate that the model fits well. The presence of faulty emergency response behavior in drivers is significantly correlated with five factors: age, gender, fatigue driving, speeding, and weather conditions. Moreover, these factors have different impacts on CMV drivers and NCMV drivers. Fatigue driving and speeding have a more significant impact on CMV drivers, while other factors are more pronounced for NCMV drivers. This study can provide valuable insights for the development of measures aimed at reducing the severity of CMV-NCMV crashes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3606205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Influencing Factors of Drivers’ Fault Emergency Response Behavior in CMV-NCMV Crashes\",\"authors\":\"Panyi Wei,&nbsp;Jianling Huang,&nbsp;Yanyan Chen,&nbsp;Jianming Ma,&nbsp;Yunchao Zhang,&nbsp;Shaohua Wang,&nbsp;Ning Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/3606205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Drivers’ fault emergency response behavior can easily lead to crashes, resulting in significant economic and property losses. Exploring the causes of improper emergency response behavior is crucial for regulating driver behavior and preventing crash. Therefore, based on crashes data between commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) and noncommercial motor vehicles (NCMVs) that occurred in China from 2014 to 2018, this study established a binary logistic regression model. It systematically analyzed the key factors influencing drivers’ fault emergency response behaviors in terms of individuals, vehicles, road conditions, environment, and corporate management. Additionally, it compared the differences in the influencing factors of fault emergency response behaviors between drivers of CMV and NCMV. The results indicate that the model fits well. The presence of faulty emergency response behavior in drivers is significantly correlated with five factors: age, gender, fatigue driving, speeding, and weather conditions. Moreover, these factors have different impacts on CMV drivers and NCMV drivers. Fatigue driving and speeding have a more significant impact on CMV drivers, while other factors are more pronounced for NCMV drivers. This study can provide valuable insights for the development of measures aimed at reducing the severity of CMV-NCMV crashes.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Transportation\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3606205\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3606205\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3606205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

驾驶员的错误应急行为很容易导致车祸,造成重大经济和财产损失。探究不当应急行为的原因对于规范驾驶员行为、预防碰撞事故至关重要。因此,本研究基于2014-2018年中国发生的商用机动车(CMV)与非商业机动车(NCMV)之间的碰撞事故数据,建立了二元逻辑回归模型。从个人、车辆、路况、环境、企业管理等方面系统分析了影响驾驶员故障应急行为的关键因素。此外,还比较了 CMV 和 NCMV 驾驶员故障应急行为影响因素的差异。结果表明,模型拟合良好。驾驶员故障应急行为的存在与年龄、性别、疲劳驾驶、超速和天气条件这五个因素显著相关。而且,这些因素对 CMV 驾驶员和 NCMV 驾驶员的影响各不相同。疲劳驾驶和超速对 CMV 驾驶员的影响更为明显,而其他因素对 NCMV 驾驶员的影响则更为明显。这项研究可为制定旨在降低 CMV-NCMV 碰撞严重程度的措施提供宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Influencing Factors of Drivers’ Fault Emergency Response Behavior in CMV-NCMV Crashes

Drivers’ fault emergency response behavior can easily lead to crashes, resulting in significant economic and property losses. Exploring the causes of improper emergency response behavior is crucial for regulating driver behavior and preventing crash. Therefore, based on crashes data between commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) and noncommercial motor vehicles (NCMVs) that occurred in China from 2014 to 2018, this study established a binary logistic regression model. It systematically analyzed the key factors influencing drivers’ fault emergency response behaviors in terms of individuals, vehicles, road conditions, environment, and corporate management. Additionally, it compared the differences in the influencing factors of fault emergency response behaviors between drivers of CMV and NCMV. The results indicate that the model fits well. The presence of faulty emergency response behavior in drivers is significantly correlated with five factors: age, gender, fatigue driving, speeding, and weather conditions. Moreover, these factors have different impacts on CMV drivers and NCMV drivers. Fatigue driving and speeding have a more significant impact on CMV drivers, while other factors are more pronounced for NCMV drivers. This study can provide valuable insights for the development of measures aimed at reducing the severity of CMV-NCMV crashes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Journal of Advanced Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Transportation (JAT) is a fully peer reviewed international journal in transportation research areas related to public transit, road traffic, transport networks and air transport. It publishes theoretical and innovative papers on analysis, design, operations, optimization and planning of multi-modal transport networks, transit & traffic systems, transport technology and traffic safety. Urban rail and bus systems, Pedestrian studies, traffic flow theory and control, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) and automated and/or connected vehicles are some topics of interest. Highway engineering, railway engineering and logistics do not fall within the aims and scope of JAT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信