航天器神经制导和控制中的最优化原则。

IF 26.1 1区 计算机科学 Q1 ROBOTICS
Dario Izzo, Emmanuel Blazquez, Robin Ferede, Sebastien Origer, Christophe De Wagter, Guido C. H. E. de Croon
{"title":"航天器神经制导和控制中的最优化原则。","authors":"Dario Izzo,&nbsp;Emmanuel Blazquez,&nbsp;Robin Ferede,&nbsp;Sebastien Origer,&nbsp;Christophe De Wagter,&nbsp;Guido C. H. E. de Croon","doi":"10.1126/scirobotics.adi6421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >This Review discusses the main results obtained in training end-to-end neural architectures for guidance and control of interplanetary transfers, planetary landings, and close-proximity operations, highlighting the successful learning of optimality principles by the underlying neural models. Spacecraft and drones aimed at exploring our solar system are designed to operate in conditions where the smart use of onboard resources is vital to the success or failure of the mission. Sensorimotor actions are thus often derived from high-level, quantifiable, optimality principles assigned to each task, using consolidated tools in optimal control theory. The planned actions are derived on the ground and transferred on board, where controllers have the task of tracking the uploaded guidance profile. Here, we review recent trends based on the use of end-to-end networks, called guidance and control networks (G&amp;CNets), which allow spacecraft to depart from such an architecture and to embrace the onboard computation of optimal actions. In this way, the sensor information is transformed in real time into optimal plans, thus increasing mission autonomy and robustness. We then analyze drone racing as an ideal gym environment to test these architectures on real robotic platforms and thus increase confidence in their use in future space exploration missions. Drone racing not only shares with spacecraft missions both limited onboard computational capabilities and similar control structures induced from the optimality principle sought but also entails different levels of uncertainties and unmodeled effects and a very different dynamical timescale.</div>","PeriodicalId":56029,"journal":{"name":"Science Robotics","volume":"9 91","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":26.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/scirobotics.adi6421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimality principles in spacecraft neural guidance and control\",\"authors\":\"Dario Izzo,&nbsp;Emmanuel Blazquez,&nbsp;Robin Ferede,&nbsp;Sebastien Origer,&nbsp;Christophe De Wagter,&nbsp;Guido C. H. E. de Croon\",\"doi\":\"10.1126/scirobotics.adi6421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div >This Review discusses the main results obtained in training end-to-end neural architectures for guidance and control of interplanetary transfers, planetary landings, and close-proximity operations, highlighting the successful learning of optimality principles by the underlying neural models. Spacecraft and drones aimed at exploring our solar system are designed to operate in conditions where the smart use of onboard resources is vital to the success or failure of the mission. Sensorimotor actions are thus often derived from high-level, quantifiable, optimality principles assigned to each task, using consolidated tools in optimal control theory. The planned actions are derived on the ground and transferred on board, where controllers have the task of tracking the uploaded guidance profile. Here, we review recent trends based on the use of end-to-end networks, called guidance and control networks (G&amp;CNets), which allow spacecraft to depart from such an architecture and to embrace the onboard computation of optimal actions. In this way, the sensor information is transformed in real time into optimal plans, thus increasing mission autonomy and robustness. We then analyze drone racing as an ideal gym environment to test these architectures on real robotic platforms and thus increase confidence in their use in future space exploration missions. Drone racing not only shares with spacecraft missions both limited onboard computational capabilities and similar control structures induced from the optimality principle sought but also entails different levels of uncertainties and unmodeled effects and a very different dynamical timescale.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Robotics\",\"volume\":\"9 91\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":26.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/scirobotics.adi6421\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Robotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.adi6421\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ROBOTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.adi6421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇综述讨论了在训练用于星际转移、行星着陆和近距离操作的引导和控制的端到端神经架构方面取得的主要成果,重点介绍了底层神经模型成功学习优化原则的情况。以探索太阳系为目标的航天器和无人机的设计运行条件是,机载资源的巧妙利用对任务的成败至关重要。因此,传感运动行动通常是利用最优控制理论中的综合工具,从为每项任务指定的高层次、可量化的最优原则中推导出来的。计划中的行动在地面得出,然后传输到机上,由控制人员负责跟踪上传的制导剖面图。在此,我们将回顾最近基于端到端网络(称为制导与控制网络(G&CNets))的使用趋势,这种网络允许航天器脱离这种结构,并接受最佳行动的机载计算。这样,传感器信息就能实时转化为最优计划,从而提高任务的自主性和鲁棒性。然后,我们分析了无人机竞赛,将其作为在真实机器人平台上测试这些架构的理想健身环境,从而增强在未来太空探索任务中使用这些架构的信心。无人机竞速不仅与航天器任务一样,都具有有限的机载计算能力和类似的控制结构,这些结构都是根据最优性原则设计的,而且还包含不同程度的不确定性和未建模效应,以及截然不同的动态时间尺度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimality principles in spacecraft neural guidance and control

Optimality principles in spacecraft neural guidance and control
This Review discusses the main results obtained in training end-to-end neural architectures for guidance and control of interplanetary transfers, planetary landings, and close-proximity operations, highlighting the successful learning of optimality principles by the underlying neural models. Spacecraft and drones aimed at exploring our solar system are designed to operate in conditions where the smart use of onboard resources is vital to the success or failure of the mission. Sensorimotor actions are thus often derived from high-level, quantifiable, optimality principles assigned to each task, using consolidated tools in optimal control theory. The planned actions are derived on the ground and transferred on board, where controllers have the task of tracking the uploaded guidance profile. Here, we review recent trends based on the use of end-to-end networks, called guidance and control networks (G&CNets), which allow spacecraft to depart from such an architecture and to embrace the onboard computation of optimal actions. In this way, the sensor information is transformed in real time into optimal plans, thus increasing mission autonomy and robustness. We then analyze drone racing as an ideal gym environment to test these architectures on real robotic platforms and thus increase confidence in their use in future space exploration missions. Drone racing not only shares with spacecraft missions both limited onboard computational capabilities and similar control structures induced from the optimality principle sought but also entails different levels of uncertainties and unmodeled effects and a very different dynamical timescale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science Robotics
Science Robotics Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Science Robotics publishes original, peer-reviewed, science- or engineering-based research articles that advance the field of robotics. The journal also features editor-commissioned Reviews. An international team of academic editors holds Science Robotics articles to the same high-quality standard that is the hallmark of the Science family of journals. Sub-topics include: actuators, advanced materials, artificial Intelligence, autonomous vehicles, bio-inspired design, exoskeletons, fabrication, field robotics, human-robot interaction, humanoids, industrial robotics, kinematics, machine learning, material science, medical technology, motion planning and control, micro- and nano-robotics, multi-robot control, sensors, service robotics, social and ethical issues, soft robotics, and space, planetary and undersea exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信