{"title":"精子数量和活力严重低下患者配偶体外受精后新鲜胚胎和冷冻胚胎移植的临床效果。","authors":"Xiaoxiao Hu, Lijuan Zhao, Lingying Jiang, Songying Zhang","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of <i>in vitro</i> fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) with fresh or frozen embryos in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2300 patients whose spouses have severely low sperm concentration and motility underwent IVT-ET in the Reproduction Medicine Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from April 2018 to April 2022. After applying the propensity score matching (PSM), 473 fresh embryo transferred cycles and 473 frozen embryo transferred cycles were selected for the study, and the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). In the stratification analysis, the number of retrieved oocytes in the fresh good-quality embryo transfer group was significantly increased compared with the fresh poor-quality embryo group (<i>P</i><0.05), but the very early pregnancy loss rates were similar between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05), while the rate in fresh good-quality embryo transfer group was significantly higher than that in the frozen good-quality embryo transfer group (<i>P</i><0.05). Among different age groups of women, the number of retrieved oocytes and the level of estrogen in the fresh embryo transfer group was significantly higher in the 20 to <30 years old group than that in the 30 to <35 years old group (both <i>P</i><0.05), but the clinical pregnancy rate was lower in the 20 to <30 years old group than that in the 30 to <35 years old group (<i>P</i>>0.05). Additionally, the very early pregnancy loss was significantly increased in the fresh embryo group compared with the frozen embryo group in the 20 to <30 years age group (<i>P</i><0.05)<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo transfer in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility undergoing IVF-ET. Due to the shorter transfer times, less embryo freezing damage and reduced costs, fresh embryo transfer can be considered as the first choice. However, it is not necessary to pursue fresh embryo transfer if maternal oestrogen levels are too high and there is a tendency of overstimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of fresh and frozen embryos transfer after <i>in vitro</i> fertilization in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxiao Hu, Lijuan Zhao, Lingying Jiang, Songying Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of <i>in vitro</i> fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) with fresh or frozen embryos in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2300 patients whose spouses have severely low sperm concentration and motility underwent IVT-ET in the Reproduction Medicine Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from April 2018 to April 2022. After applying the propensity score matching (PSM), 473 fresh embryo transferred cycles and 473 frozen embryo transferred cycles were selected for the study, and the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). In the stratification analysis, the number of retrieved oocytes in the fresh good-quality embryo transfer group was significantly increased compared with the fresh poor-quality embryo group (<i>P</i><0.05), but the very early pregnancy loss rates were similar between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05), while the rate in fresh good-quality embryo transfer group was significantly higher than that in the frozen good-quality embryo transfer group (<i>P</i><0.05). Among different age groups of women, the number of retrieved oocytes and the level of estrogen in the fresh embryo transfer group was significantly higher in the 20 to <30 years old group than that in the 30 to <35 years old group (both <i>P</i><0.05), but the clinical pregnancy rate was lower in the 20 to <30 years old group than that in the 30 to <35 years old group (<i>P</i>>0.05). Additionally, the very early pregnancy loss was significantly increased in the fresh embryo group compared with the frozen embryo group in the 20 to <30 years age group (<i>P</i><0.05)<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo transfer in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility undergoing IVF-ET. Due to the shorter transfer times, less embryo freezing damage and reduced costs, fresh embryo transfer can be considered as the first choice. However, it is not necessary to pursue fresh embryo transfer if maternal oestrogen levels are too high and there is a tendency of overstimulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的比较使用新鲜胚胎或冷冻胚胎进行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)对严重少精子症和精子活力低下的男性患者的妊娠和新生儿结局:2018年4月至2022年4月,共有2300名男性严重少精子症患者在邵逸夫医院生殖医学中心接受了IVT-ET治疗。应用倾向得分匹配(PSM)后,研究选取473个新鲜胚胎移植周期和473个冷冻胚胎移植周期,比较两组患者的妊娠结局和新生儿结局:结果:新鲜胚胎组和冷冻胚胎组的妊娠结局和新生儿结局无明显差异(P>0.05)。在分层分析中,与新鲜劣质胚胎组相比,新鲜优质胚胎移植组的取卵数量明显增加(PPPP>0.05)。此外,与冷冻胚胎组相比,新鲜胚胎组的极早期妊娠损失在 20 至 P 之间明显增加:对于接受体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)的精子数量和活力严重低下的男性患者,新鲜胚胎移植和冷冻胚胎移植在妊娠和新生儿结局方面没有明显差异。由于移植时间短、胚胎冷冻损伤小、费用低,新鲜胚胎移植可被视为首选。但是,如果母体雌激素水平过高,有过度刺激的倾向,则没有必要进行新鲜胚胎移植。
Clinical outcomes of fresh and frozen embryos transfer after in vitro fertilization in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility.
Objectives: To compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) with fresh or frozen embryos in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility.
Methods: A total of 2300 patients whose spouses have severely low sperm concentration and motility underwent IVT-ET in the Reproduction Medicine Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from April 2018 to April 2022. After applying the propensity score matching (PSM), 473 fresh embryo transferred cycles and 473 frozen embryo transferred cycles were selected for the study, and the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results: There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo groups (all P>0.05). In the stratification analysis, the number of retrieved oocytes in the fresh good-quality embryo transfer group was significantly increased compared with the fresh poor-quality embryo group (P<0.05), but the very early pregnancy loss rates were similar between the two groups (P>0.05), while the rate in fresh good-quality embryo transfer group was significantly higher than that in the frozen good-quality embryo transfer group (P<0.05). Among different age groups of women, the number of retrieved oocytes and the level of estrogen in the fresh embryo transfer group was significantly higher in the 20 to <30 years old group than that in the 30 to <35 years old group (both P<0.05), but the clinical pregnancy rate was lower in the 20 to <30 years old group than that in the 30 to <35 years old group (P>0.05). Additionally, the very early pregnancy loss was significantly increased in the fresh embryo group compared with the frozen embryo group in the 20 to <30 years age group (P<0.05).
Conclusions: There were no significant differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo transfer in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility undergoing IVF-ET. Due to the shorter transfer times, less embryo freezing damage and reduced costs, fresh embryo transfer can be considered as the first choice. However, it is not necessary to pursue fresh embryo transfer if maternal oestrogen levels are too high and there is a tendency of overstimulation.