对年龄大于 75 岁的可切除食管鳞状细胞癌患者进行食管切除术和放化疗的生存效果。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Thoracic Cancer Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.15329
Shuhei Mayanagi, Masazumi Inoue, Kazunori Tokizawa, Kunihiro Fushiki, Takahiro Tsushima, Tomoya Yokota, Kentaro Yamazaki, Hirofumi Yasui, Yasuhiro Tsubosa
{"title":"对年龄大于 75 岁的可切除食管鳞状细胞癌患者进行食管切除术和放化疗的生存效果。","authors":"Shuhei Mayanagi, Masazumi Inoue, Kazunori Tokizawa, Kunihiro Fushiki, Takahiro Tsushima, Tomoya Yokota, Kentaro Yamazaki, Hirofumi Yasui, Yasuhiro Tsubosa","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.15329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is surgery-based treatment; however, it is unclear whether esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy is suitable for older patients. This retrospective study aimed to identify the treatment outcomes of surgery-based therapy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an initial treatment for older patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 434 patients who received radical treatment for resectable, locally advanced ESCC were collected from January 2011 to December 2020. Of the patients >75 years of age, 49 underwent radical esophagectomy and 26 received dCRT. Survival was compared between the surgery and dCRT groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ages of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 77.3 and 78.8 years, respectively. Differences in overall survival (OS) between the two groups were not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 66.2%, dCRT 55.7%, p = 0.236). Multivariate analysis for OS showed a hazard ratio of 1.229 for dCRT versus surgery (90% confidence interval 0.681-2.217). OS did not differ between the groups in any of the performance statuses. For patients who were able to receive chemotherapy using fluorouracil and cisplatin, OS tended to be better in the surgery group, but the difference was not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 68.1%, dCRT 51.8%, p = 0.117).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no clear difference in survival outcome between surgery-based therapy and dCRT as an initial treatment for esophageal cancer in older patients. Either treatment may be an option for older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11260550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival outcome of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients >75 years of age.\",\"authors\":\"Shuhei Mayanagi, Masazumi Inoue, Kazunori Tokizawa, Kunihiro Fushiki, Takahiro Tsushima, Tomoya Yokota, Kentaro Yamazaki, Hirofumi Yasui, Yasuhiro Tsubosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.15329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is surgery-based treatment; however, it is unclear whether esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy is suitable for older patients. This retrospective study aimed to identify the treatment outcomes of surgery-based therapy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an initial treatment for older patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 434 patients who received radical treatment for resectable, locally advanced ESCC were collected from January 2011 to December 2020. Of the patients >75 years of age, 49 underwent radical esophagectomy and 26 received dCRT. Survival was compared between the surgery and dCRT groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ages of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 77.3 and 78.8 years, respectively. Differences in overall survival (OS) between the two groups were not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 66.2%, dCRT 55.7%, p = 0.236). Multivariate analysis for OS showed a hazard ratio of 1.229 for dCRT versus surgery (90% confidence interval 0.681-2.217). OS did not differ between the groups in any of the performance statuses. For patients who were able to receive chemotherapy using fluorouracil and cisplatin, OS tended to be better in the surgery group, but the difference was not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 68.1%, dCRT 51.8%, p = 0.117).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no clear difference in survival outcome between surgery-based therapy and dCRT as an initial treatment for esophageal cancer in older patients. Either treatment may be an option for older patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11260550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15329\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:可切除的局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的金标准是手术治疗,但食管切除术或化学放疗是否适合老年患者尚不清楚。这项回顾性研究旨在确定手术治疗与确定性化放疗(dCRT)作为可切除的局部晚期ESCC老年患者初始治疗方法的治疗效果:收集了2011年1月至2020年12月期间434名接受根治性治疗的可切除局部晚期ESCC患者的数据。在年龄大于 75 岁的患者中,49 人接受了根治性食管切除术,26 人接受了 dCRT。比较了手术组和 dCRT 组的生存率:手术组和化疗组的平均年龄分别为 77.3 岁和 78.8 岁。两组的总生存率(OS)差异无统计学意义(3年OS:手术66.2%,dCRT 55.7%,P = 0.236)。OS多变量分析显示,dCRT与手术的危险比为1.229(90%置信区间为0.681-2.217)。各组间的 OS 在任何表现状态下均无差异。对于能够接受氟尿嘧啶和顺铂化疗的患者,手术组的OS往往更好,但差异无统计学意义(3年OS:手术68.1%,dCRT 51.8%,P = 0.117):结论:在老年食管癌的初始治疗中,手术治疗和 dCRT 治疗的生存结果没有明显差异。老年患者可以选择两种治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival outcome of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients >75 years of age.

Background: The gold standard for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is surgery-based treatment; however, it is unclear whether esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy is suitable for older patients. This retrospective study aimed to identify the treatment outcomes of surgery-based therapy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an initial treatment for older patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC.

Methods: Data from 434 patients who received radical treatment for resectable, locally advanced ESCC were collected from January 2011 to December 2020. Of the patients >75 years of age, 49 underwent radical esophagectomy and 26 received dCRT. Survival was compared between the surgery and dCRT groups.

Results: The mean ages of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 77.3 and 78.8 years, respectively. Differences in overall survival (OS) between the two groups were not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 66.2%, dCRT 55.7%, p = 0.236). Multivariate analysis for OS showed a hazard ratio of 1.229 for dCRT versus surgery (90% confidence interval 0.681-2.217). OS did not differ between the groups in any of the performance statuses. For patients who were able to receive chemotherapy using fluorouracil and cisplatin, OS tended to be better in the surgery group, but the difference was not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 68.1%, dCRT 51.8%, p = 0.117).

Conclusions: There was no clear difference in survival outcome between surgery-based therapy and dCRT as an initial treatment for esophageal cancer in older patients. Either treatment may be an option for older patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信