坦桑尼亚东北部接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者自我血糖监测对血糖控制的影响:随机对照试验

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Diabetes Research Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6789672
Sophia S Muhali, Fatma S Muhali, Sayoki G Mfinanga, Abid M Sadiq, Annette A Marandu, Norman J Kyala, Fuad H Said, Eliada B Nziku, Tumaini E Mirai, James S Ngocho, Henry L Mlay, Gilbert G Waria, Angelina Chambega, Stella N Kessy, Kajiru G Kilonzo, Furaha S Lyamuya, Elifuraha W Mkwizu, Elichilia R Shao, Nyasatu G Chamba
{"title":"坦桑尼亚东北部接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者自我血糖监测对血糖控制的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Sophia S Muhali, Fatma S Muhali, Sayoki G Mfinanga, Abid M Sadiq, Annette A Marandu, Norman J Kyala, Fuad H Said, Eliada B Nziku, Tumaini E Mirai, James S Ngocho, Henry L Mlay, Gilbert G Waria, Angelina Chambega, Stella N Kessy, Kajiru G Kilonzo, Furaha S Lyamuya, Elifuraha W Mkwizu, Elichilia R Shao, Nyasatu G Chamba","doi":"10.1155/2024/6789672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Tracking of blood glucose levels by patients and care providers remains an integral component in the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). Evidence, primarily from high-income countries, has illustrated the effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in controlling DM. However, there is limited data on the feasibility and impact of SMBG among patients in the rural regions of sub-Saharan Africa. This study is aimed at assessing SMBG, its adherence, and associated factors on the effect of glycaemic control among insulin-treated patients with DM in northeastern Tanzania. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This was a single-blinded, randomised clinical trial conducted from December 2022 to May 2023. The study included patients with DM who had already been on insulin treatment for at least 3 months. A total of 85 participants were recruited into the study and categorised into the intervention and control groups by a simple randomization method using numbered envelopes. The intervention group received glucose metres, test strips, logbooks, and extensive SMBG training. The control group received the usual care at the outpatient clinic. Each participant was followed for a period of 12 weeks, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) being checked both at the beginning and at the end of the study follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes were adherence to the SMBG schedule, barriers associated with the use of SMBG, and the ability to self-manage DM, logbook data recording, and change in HbA<sub>1c</sub>. The analysis included descriptive statistics, paired <i>t</i>-tests, and logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> Eighty participants were analysed: 39 in the intervention group and 41 in the control group. In the intervention group, 24 (61.5%) of patients displayed favourable adherence to SMBG, as evidenced by tests documented in the logbooks and glucometer readings. Education on SMBG was significantly associated with adherence. Structured SMBG improved glycaemic control with a HbA<sub>1c</sub> reduction of -1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.39, -0.63) in the intervention group within 3 months from baseline compared to controls of 0.18 (95% CI -0.07, 0.44) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Structured SMBG positively impacted glycaemic control among insulin-treated patients with DM in the outpatient clinic. The results suggest that implementing a structured testing programme can lead to significant reductions in HbA<sub>1c</sub> and FBG levels. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Pan African Clinical Trials Registry identifier: PACTR202402642155729.</p>","PeriodicalId":15576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Research","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6789672"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose on Glycaemic Control Among Insulin-Treated Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in Northeastern Tanzania: A Randomised Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sophia S Muhali, Fatma S Muhali, Sayoki G Mfinanga, Abid M Sadiq, Annette A Marandu, Norman J Kyala, Fuad H Said, Eliada B Nziku, Tumaini E Mirai, James S Ngocho, Henry L Mlay, Gilbert G Waria, Angelina Chambega, Stella N Kessy, Kajiru G Kilonzo, Furaha S Lyamuya, Elifuraha W Mkwizu, Elichilia R Shao, Nyasatu G Chamba\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/6789672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Tracking of blood glucose levels by patients and care providers remains an integral component in the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). Evidence, primarily from high-income countries, has illustrated the effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in controlling DM. However, there is limited data on the feasibility and impact of SMBG among patients in the rural regions of sub-Saharan Africa. This study is aimed at assessing SMBG, its adherence, and associated factors on the effect of glycaemic control among insulin-treated patients with DM in northeastern Tanzania. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This was a single-blinded, randomised clinical trial conducted from December 2022 to May 2023. The study included patients with DM who had already been on insulin treatment for at least 3 months. A total of 85 participants were recruited into the study and categorised into the intervention and control groups by a simple randomization method using numbered envelopes. The intervention group received glucose metres, test strips, logbooks, and extensive SMBG training. The control group received the usual care at the outpatient clinic. Each participant was followed for a period of 12 weeks, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) being checked both at the beginning and at the end of the study follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes were adherence to the SMBG schedule, barriers associated with the use of SMBG, and the ability to self-manage DM, logbook data recording, and change in HbA<sub>1c</sub>. The analysis included descriptive statistics, paired <i>t</i>-tests, and logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> Eighty participants were analysed: 39 in the intervention group and 41 in the control group. In the intervention group, 24 (61.5%) of patients displayed favourable adherence to SMBG, as evidenced by tests documented in the logbooks and glucometer readings. Education on SMBG was significantly associated with adherence. Structured SMBG improved glycaemic control with a HbA<sub>1c</sub> reduction of -1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.39, -0.63) in the intervention group within 3 months from baseline compared to controls of 0.18 (95% CI -0.07, 0.44) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Structured SMBG positively impacted glycaemic control among insulin-treated patients with DM in the outpatient clinic. The results suggest that implementing a structured testing programme can lead to significant reductions in HbA<sub>1c</sub> and FBG levels. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Pan African Clinical Trials Registry identifier: PACTR202402642155729.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes Research\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"6789672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6789672\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6789672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:患者和护理人员对血糖水平的跟踪仍然是糖尿病(DM)管理中不可或缺的组成部分。主要来自高收入国家的证据表明,自我血糖监测(SMBG)在控制糖尿病方面非常有效。然而,有关撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区患者使用 SMBG 的可行性和影响的数据却很有限。本研究旨在评估坦桑尼亚东北部接受过胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者对 SMBG、SMBG 的依从性以及相关因素对血糖控制的影响。材料与方法:这是一项单盲随机临床试验,于 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 5 月进行。研究对象包括接受胰岛素治疗至少 3 个月的糖尿病患者。研究共招募了 85 名参与者,并通过使用编号信封的简单随机方法将其分为干预组和对照组。干预组接受血糖仪、试纸、记录本和广泛的 SMBG 培训。对照组则在门诊接受常规护理。对每位参与者进行为期 12 周的随访,并在随访开始和结束时检测糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和空腹血糖(FBG)。研究的主要和次要结果是对 SMBG 计划的依从性、与使用 SMBG 相关的障碍、自我管理糖尿病的能力、日志数据记录以及 HbA1c 的变化。分析包括描述性统计、配对 t 检验和逻辑回归。结果:对 80 名参与者进行了分析:干预组 39 人,对照组 41 人。在干预组中,24 名患者(61.5%)对 SMBG 的依从性良好,这一点可以从记录本中的测试记录和血糖仪读数中得到证明。关于 SMBG 的教育与坚持率明显相关。结构化 SMBG 改善了血糖控制,与对照组相比,干预组在基线后 3 个月内 HbA1c 降低了 0.18(95% 置信区间(CI)-0.07, 0.44),而对照组降低了 0.01(95% 置信区间(CI)-1.39, -0.63)(p < 0.001)。结论结构化 SMBG 对门诊中接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者的血糖控制有积极影响。结果表明,实施结构化检测计划可显著降低 HbA1c 和 FBG 水平。试验注册:泛非临床试验注册标识符:PACTR202402642155729.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose on Glycaemic Control Among Insulin-Treated Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in Northeastern Tanzania: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Tracking of blood glucose levels by patients and care providers remains an integral component in the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). Evidence, primarily from high-income countries, has illustrated the effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in controlling DM. However, there is limited data on the feasibility and impact of SMBG among patients in the rural regions of sub-Saharan Africa. This study is aimed at assessing SMBG, its adherence, and associated factors on the effect of glycaemic control among insulin-treated patients with DM in northeastern Tanzania. Materials and Methods: This was a single-blinded, randomised clinical trial conducted from December 2022 to May 2023. The study included patients with DM who had already been on insulin treatment for at least 3 months. A total of 85 participants were recruited into the study and categorised into the intervention and control groups by a simple randomization method using numbered envelopes. The intervention group received glucose metres, test strips, logbooks, and extensive SMBG training. The control group received the usual care at the outpatient clinic. Each participant was followed for a period of 12 weeks, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) being checked both at the beginning and at the end of the study follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes were adherence to the SMBG schedule, barriers associated with the use of SMBG, and the ability to self-manage DM, logbook data recording, and change in HbA1c. The analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and logistic regression. Results: Eighty participants were analysed: 39 in the intervention group and 41 in the control group. In the intervention group, 24 (61.5%) of patients displayed favourable adherence to SMBG, as evidenced by tests documented in the logbooks and glucometer readings. Education on SMBG was significantly associated with adherence. Structured SMBG improved glycaemic control with a HbA1c reduction of -1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.39, -0.63) in the intervention group within 3 months from baseline compared to controls of 0.18 (95% CI -0.07, 0.44) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Structured SMBG positively impacted glycaemic control among insulin-treated patients with DM in the outpatient clinic. The results suggest that implementing a structured testing programme can lead to significant reductions in HbA1c and FBG levels. Trial Registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry identifier: PACTR202402642155729.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Research
Journal of Diabetes Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
152
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The journal welcomes submissions focusing on the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, and prevention of diabetes, as well as associated complications, such as diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信