多学科伤口中心在治疗血管性溃疡和脓皮病溃疡中的作用。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Laura Suoniemi, Teea Salmi, Heini Huhtala, Ilkka Kaartinen, Juha Kiiski, Teija Kimpimäki
{"title":"多学科伤口中心在治疗血管性溃疡和脓皮病溃疡中的作用。","authors":"Laura Suoniemi,&nbsp;Teea Salmi,&nbsp;Heini Huhtala,&nbsp;Ilkka Kaartinen,&nbsp;Juha Kiiski,&nbsp;Teija Kimpimäki","doi":"10.1111/iwj.14943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers are traditionally treated with immunosuppressants, and the role of surgery in the treatment of these atypical ulcers remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the need for surgical intervention as well as the outcome and safety of skin grafting in the treatment of 46 patients with vasculitic ulcers and 34 with pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers using data recorded in the validated Wound Registry. Of the 80 patients with atypical ulcers, 14% (<i>n</i> = 11) were treated surgically; these patients were older (<i>p</i> = 0.039), had lower mobility status (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and more often pulmonary diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, and previous arterial procedures (<i>p</i> = 0.007; <i>p</i> = 0.031; <i>p</i> = 0.031, respectively) than those treated conservatively. Of 181 ulcers, 15% (<i>n</i> = 27) were surgically treated, 78% once and 22% multiple times. During follow-up, 92.3% of both surgically and conservatively treated ulcers with available data healed. Of the surgically treated ulcers, median healing time after first surgical procedure was 96 days, and post-surgical complications were considered mild or unrelated to surgery. Our results suggest that if surgery is indicated, skin grafting is a safe and efficient treatment method provided that multidisciplinary approach is applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.14943","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of split-thickness skin grafting in the treatment of vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers in a multidisciplinary wound centre\",\"authors\":\"Laura Suoniemi,&nbsp;Teea Salmi,&nbsp;Heini Huhtala,&nbsp;Ilkka Kaartinen,&nbsp;Juha Kiiski,&nbsp;Teija Kimpimäki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iwj.14943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers are traditionally treated with immunosuppressants, and the role of surgery in the treatment of these atypical ulcers remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the need for surgical intervention as well as the outcome and safety of skin grafting in the treatment of 46 patients with vasculitic ulcers and 34 with pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers using data recorded in the validated Wound Registry. Of the 80 patients with atypical ulcers, 14% (<i>n</i> = 11) were treated surgically; these patients were older (<i>p</i> = 0.039), had lower mobility status (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and more often pulmonary diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, and previous arterial procedures (<i>p</i> = 0.007; <i>p</i> = 0.031; <i>p</i> = 0.031, respectively) than those treated conservatively. Of 181 ulcers, 15% (<i>n</i> = 27) were surgically treated, 78% once and 22% multiple times. During follow-up, 92.3% of both surgically and conservatively treated ulcers with available data healed. Of the surgically treated ulcers, median healing time after first surgical procedure was 96 days, and post-surgical complications were considered mild or unrelated to surgery. Our results suggest that if surgery is indicated, skin grafting is a safe and efficient treatment method provided that multidisciplinary approach is applied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.14943\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.14943\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.14943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血管性溃疡和脓皮病溃疡传统上采用免疫抑制剂治疗,而手术在治疗这些非典型溃疡中的作用仍不明确。本研究旨在利用有效的伤口登记数据,调查 46 例血管炎性溃疡患者和 34 例脓皮病性溃疡患者的手术干预需求以及植皮治疗的效果和安全性。在80名非典型溃疡患者中,14%(n = 11)接受了手术治疗;与保守治疗的患者相比,这些患者年龄更大(p = 0.039),行动能力更差(p = 0.002),更常见肺部疾病、类风湿性关节炎和既往动脉手术(分别为p = 0.007;p = 0.031;p = 0.031)。在 181 例溃疡中,15%(n = 27)接受过手术治疗,其中 78% 接受过一次手术治疗,22% 接受过多次手术治疗。在随访期间,有数据可查的手术治疗和保守治疗溃疡中,92.3%的溃疡已经愈合。在手术治疗的溃疡中,首次手术后的中位愈合时间为96天,手术后并发症被认为是轻微的或与手术无关。我们的研究结果表明,如果有手术指征,只要采用多学科方法,植皮是一种安全有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of split-thickness skin grafting in the treatment of vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers in a multidisciplinary wound centre

The role of split-thickness skin grafting in the treatment of vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers in a multidisciplinary wound centre

Vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers are traditionally treated with immunosuppressants, and the role of surgery in the treatment of these atypical ulcers remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the need for surgical intervention as well as the outcome and safety of skin grafting in the treatment of 46 patients with vasculitic ulcers and 34 with pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers using data recorded in the validated Wound Registry. Of the 80 patients with atypical ulcers, 14% (n = 11) were treated surgically; these patients were older (p = 0.039), had lower mobility status (p = 0.002), and more often pulmonary diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, and previous arterial procedures (p = 0.007; p = 0.031; p = 0.031, respectively) than those treated conservatively. Of 181 ulcers, 15% (n = 27) were surgically treated, 78% once and 22% multiple times. During follow-up, 92.3% of both surgically and conservatively treated ulcers with available data healed. Of the surgically treated ulcers, median healing time after first surgical procedure was 96 days, and post-surgical complications were considered mild or unrelated to surgery. Our results suggest that if surgery is indicated, skin grafting is a safe and efficient treatment method provided that multidisciplinary approach is applied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信