伽玛刀手术治疗后颅内前庭神经丛瘤患者的长期生活质量:随访研究

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mirosław Ząbek, Grzegorz Turek, Katarzyna Bieńkowska, Andrzej Kokoszka, Sebastian Dzierzęcki, Barbara Kostecka
{"title":"伽玛刀手术治疗后颅内前庭神经丛瘤患者的长期生活质量:随访研究","authors":"Mirosław Ząbek,&nbsp;Grzegorz Turek,&nbsp;Katarzyna Bieńkowska,&nbsp;Andrzej Kokoszka,&nbsp;Sebastian Dzierzęcki,&nbsp;Barbara Kostecka","doi":"10.1155/2024/5598225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Our previous research showed that the gamma knife surgery (GKS) is a highly effective treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (IVS). In the current study, we aimed to evaluate long-term quality of life (QoL) as a follow-up to the assessment of baseline clinical and demographic parameters in the original study. Moreover, QoL outcomes were compared with norms for the general population and for patients who underwent different ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. The follow-up study included 92 patients (59 women and 33 men; mean age, 61.71 ± 12.55 years; range: 32-85 years) with unilateral IVS who underwent GKS. Patients completed the <i>Assessment of Quality of Life</i>, Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, and WHO-5 Well-being Index questionnaires as well as a demographic survey. Neurosurgical parameters were assessed using the Koos and House-Brackmann scales and the results of audiological examinations. <i>Results and Conclusions</i>. QoL scores were within or above the norm in 38% of patients. There were significant differences in terms of comorbidities and emotional well-being between patients with QoL scores within or above the norm and patients with QoL scores below the norm. Comorbidities were more common in patients with QoL scores below the norm, and they influenced reported QoL (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Patients with QoL scores within or above the norm reported better emotional well-being than those with QoL scores below the norm. Long-term QoL outcomes were satisfactory, consistent with the results of the original study. Although GKS is a complex procedure, patients reported higher QoL than those using hearing aids and the same QoL as those after ENT surgery or reassurance. However, they reported a slightly lower QoL than patients taking ENT medications. GKS appears to be a promising treatment option for patients with IVS.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5598225","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Quality of Life in Patients with Intracanalicular Vestibular Schwannomas after Gamma Knife Surgery Treatment: A Follow-Up Study\",\"authors\":\"Mirosław Ząbek,&nbsp;Grzegorz Turek,&nbsp;Katarzyna Bieńkowska,&nbsp;Andrzej Kokoszka,&nbsp;Sebastian Dzierzęcki,&nbsp;Barbara Kostecka\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5598225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Our previous research showed that the gamma knife surgery (GKS) is a highly effective treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (IVS). In the current study, we aimed to evaluate long-term quality of life (QoL) as a follow-up to the assessment of baseline clinical and demographic parameters in the original study. Moreover, QoL outcomes were compared with norms for the general population and for patients who underwent different ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. The follow-up study included 92 patients (59 women and 33 men; mean age, 61.71 ± 12.55 years; range: 32-85 years) with unilateral IVS who underwent GKS. Patients completed the <i>Assessment of Quality of Life</i>, Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, and WHO-5 Well-being Index questionnaires as well as a demographic survey. Neurosurgical parameters were assessed using the Koos and House-Brackmann scales and the results of audiological examinations. <i>Results and Conclusions</i>. QoL scores were within or above the norm in 38% of patients. There were significant differences in terms of comorbidities and emotional well-being between patients with QoL scores within or above the norm and patients with QoL scores below the norm. Comorbidities were more common in patients with QoL scores below the norm, and they influenced reported QoL (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Patients with QoL scores within or above the norm reported better emotional well-being than those with QoL scores below the norm. Long-term QoL outcomes were satisfactory, consistent with the results of the original study. Although GKS is a complex procedure, patients reported higher QoL than those using hearing aids and the same QoL as those after ENT surgery or reassurance. However, they reported a slightly lower QoL than patients taking ENT medications. GKS appears to be a promising treatment option for patients with IVS.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5598225\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5598225\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5598225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言我们之前的研究表明,伽玛刀手术(GKS)是治疗腔内前庭分裂瘤(IVS)的一种高效疗法。在本研究中,我们旨在评估长期生活质量(QoL),作为对原研究中基线临床和人口学参数评估的后续跟进。此外,我们还将 QoL 结果与普通人群和接受不同耳鼻喉科手术的患者的标准进行了比较。材料和方法。随访研究包括 92 名接受 GKS 的单侧 IVS 患者(59 名女性和 33 名男性;平均年龄为 61.71 ± 12.55 岁;年龄范围为 32-85 岁)。患者填写了 "生活质量评估"、"宾州听神经瘤生活质量"、"格拉斯哥效益量表 "和 "WHO-5 幸福指数 "问卷以及人口统计学调查。神经外科参数采用 Koos 和 House-Brackmann 量表以及听力检查结果进行评估。结果和结论38%的患者 QoL 评分在标准范围内或高于标准范围。在合并症和情绪健康方面,QoL 分数在标准值以内或以上的患者与 QoL 分数低于标准值的患者之间存在明显差异。并发症在 QoL 评分低于标准值的患者中更为常见,并且会影响所报告的 QoL(p = 0.009)。与 QoL 分数低于标准值的患者相比,QoL 分数在标准值以内或高于标准值的患者报告的情绪健康状况更好。长期的 QoL 结果令人满意,与最初研究的结果一致。虽然 GKS 是一项复杂的手术,但患者报告的 QoL 比使用助听器的患者高,与耳鼻喉科手术后或再保证后的 QoL 相同。不过,他们报告的 QoL 略低于服用耳鼻喉科药物的患者。对于 IVS 患者来说,GKS 似乎是一种很有前景的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Long-Term Quality of Life in Patients with Intracanalicular Vestibular Schwannomas after Gamma Knife Surgery Treatment: A Follow-Up Study

Long-Term Quality of Life in Patients with Intracanalicular Vestibular Schwannomas after Gamma Knife Surgery Treatment: A Follow-Up Study

Introduction. Our previous research showed that the gamma knife surgery (GKS) is a highly effective treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (IVS). In the current study, we aimed to evaluate long-term quality of life (QoL) as a follow-up to the assessment of baseline clinical and demographic parameters in the original study. Moreover, QoL outcomes were compared with norms for the general population and for patients who underwent different ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures. Materials and Methods. The follow-up study included 92 patients (59 women and 33 men; mean age, 61.71 ± 12.55 years; range: 32-85 years) with unilateral IVS who underwent GKS. Patients completed the Assessment of Quality of Life, Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, and WHO-5 Well-being Index questionnaires as well as a demographic survey. Neurosurgical parameters were assessed using the Koos and House-Brackmann scales and the results of audiological examinations. Results and Conclusions. QoL scores were within or above the norm in 38% of patients. There were significant differences in terms of comorbidities and emotional well-being between patients with QoL scores within or above the norm and patients with QoL scores below the norm. Comorbidities were more common in patients with QoL scores below the norm, and they influenced reported QoL (p = 0.009). Patients with QoL scores within or above the norm reported better emotional well-being than those with QoL scores below the norm. Long-term QoL outcomes were satisfactory, consistent with the results of the original study. Although GKS is a complex procedure, patients reported higher QoL than those using hearing aids and the same QoL as those after ENT surgery or reassurance. However, they reported a slightly lower QoL than patients taking ENT medications. GKS appears to be a promising treatment option for patients with IVS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信