哥伦比亚的气候变化与安全叙事

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Will Yoss, Benjamin L. Reust
{"title":"哥伦比亚的气候变化与安全叙事","authors":"Will Yoss,&nbsp;Benjamin L. Reust","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In September of 2022, Gustavo Petro presented an alternative vision of the future of Colombia from that which Colombian administrations have pursued for the past two decades. In his speech to the United Nations, Petro called for an end to the <i>irrational war on drugs</i> and described the drug epidemic as a symptom of significant societal failures. Petro directed his criticism at Plan Colombia, a counternarcotics security strategy, speaking directly about vital elements such as the aerial eradication program. Although Plan Colombia has ended, the United States continues to provide significant financial support to the Colombian government to fund its counter narcotics mission. Is Petro serious about ending the counternarcotics mission in Colombia? Given the political climate, should the United States change its policy approach in Colombia? This article argues that despite an increased use of narratives about climate change and a declining relevance of security narratives, US funding for security has remained constant. Our findings suggest that the United States uses aid as a hard power tool to ensure that certain strategic interests are met irrespective of the political climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"15 S3","pages":"93-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13332","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate change and security narratives in Colombia\",\"authors\":\"Will Yoss,&nbsp;Benjamin L. Reust\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.13332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In September of 2022, Gustavo Petro presented an alternative vision of the future of Colombia from that which Colombian administrations have pursued for the past two decades. In his speech to the United Nations, Petro called for an end to the <i>irrational war on drugs</i> and described the drug epidemic as a symptom of significant societal failures. Petro directed his criticism at Plan Colombia, a counternarcotics security strategy, speaking directly about vital elements such as the aerial eradication program. Although Plan Colombia has ended, the United States continues to provide significant financial support to the Colombian government to fund its counter narcotics mission. Is Petro serious about ending the counternarcotics mission in Colombia? Given the political climate, should the United States change its policy approach in Colombia? This article argues that despite an increased use of narratives about climate change and a declining relevance of security narratives, US funding for security has remained constant. Our findings suggest that the United States uses aid as a hard power tool to ensure that certain strategic interests are met irrespective of the political climate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"15 S3\",\"pages\":\"93-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13332\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13332\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年 9 月,古斯塔沃-彼得罗(Gustavo Petro)提出了哥伦比亚未来的另一种愿景,与哥伦比亚政府过去 20 年来所追求的愿景不同。在联合国的演讲中,彼得罗呼吁结束不合理的禁毒战争,并将毒品泛滥描述为重大社会失误的表征。彼得罗将批评矛头直指缉毒安全战略《哥伦比亚计划》,直接谈到了空中铲毒计划等重要内容。虽然《哥伦比亚计划》已经结束,但美国仍继续向哥伦比亚政府提供大量财政支持,资助其缉毒任务。彼得罗对结束哥伦比亚缉毒任务是否认真?考虑到政治气候,美国是否应该改变其在哥伦比亚的政策方针?本文认为,尽管美国越来越多地使用气候变化叙事,而安全叙事的相关性却在下降,但美国对安全的资助却保持不变。我们的研究结果表明,无论政治气候如何,美国都将援助作为一种硬实力工具,以确保某些战略利益得到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Climate change and security narratives in Colombia

Climate change and security narratives in Colombia

In September of 2022, Gustavo Petro presented an alternative vision of the future of Colombia from that which Colombian administrations have pursued for the past two decades. In his speech to the United Nations, Petro called for an end to the irrational war on drugs and described the drug epidemic as a symptom of significant societal failures. Petro directed his criticism at Plan Colombia, a counternarcotics security strategy, speaking directly about vital elements such as the aerial eradication program. Although Plan Colombia has ended, the United States continues to provide significant financial support to the Colombian government to fund its counter narcotics mission. Is Petro serious about ending the counternarcotics mission in Colombia? Given the political climate, should the United States change its policy approach in Colombia? This article argues that despite an increased use of narratives about climate change and a declining relevance of security narratives, US funding for security has remained constant. Our findings suggest that the United States uses aid as a hard power tool to ensure that certain strategic interests are met irrespective of the political climate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信