Juri Hoedemakers, Isabel de Bruin Cardoso, Philine van Overbeeke, Lucas Meijs
{"title":"与其划船,不如驾驶帆船在动荡中寻找北极星","authors":"Juri Hoedemakers, Isabel de Bruin Cardoso, Philine van Overbeeke, Lucas Meijs","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.1873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We respond to von Schnurbein and Ahmad's (2019) metaphor of rowing to elucidate the inflexibility of foundations. We suggest that perhaps a sailboat would be more appropriate to finding the north star and add a fifth proposition: a participatory decision-making process that includes balanced feedback. This approach, though not new, can pose risks such as misaligned priorities and ineffective decisions. To navigate these challenges, the introduction of a \"court jester\" role is proposed, encouraging open dialogue and critical self-reflection. The flexibility akin to sailing, where adjustments are made based on feedback, is advocated for effective and dynamic foundation governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instead of with a rowboat, search for the north star by navigating a sailboat through turbulent times\",\"authors\":\"Juri Hoedemakers, Isabel de Bruin Cardoso, Philine van Overbeeke, Lucas Meijs\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nvsm.1873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We respond to von Schnurbein and Ahmad's (2019) metaphor of rowing to elucidate the inflexibility of foundations. We suggest that perhaps a sailboat would be more appropriate to finding the north star and add a fifth proposition: a participatory decision-making process that includes balanced feedback. This approach, though not new, can pose risks such as misaligned priorities and ineffective decisions. To navigate these challenges, the introduction of a \\\"court jester\\\" role is proposed, encouraging open dialogue and critical self-reflection. The flexibility akin to sailing, where adjustments are made based on feedback, is advocated for effective and dynamic foundation governance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.1873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.1873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们回应了 von Schnurbein 和 Ahmad(2019 年)的划船比喻,以阐明基础的不灵活性。我们认为,也许帆船更适合寻找北极星,并增加了第五个命题:包括平衡反馈在内的参与式决策过程。这种方法虽然并不新鲜,但也可能带来风险,如优先事项不一致和决策无效。为了应对这些挑战,建议引入 "法庭小丑 "的角色,鼓励公开对话和批判性的自我反思。我们提倡类似于航海的灵活性,根据反馈意见进行调整,以实现有效和动态的基金会治理。
Instead of with a rowboat, search for the north star by navigating a sailboat through turbulent times
We respond to von Schnurbein and Ahmad's (2019) metaphor of rowing to elucidate the inflexibility of foundations. We suggest that perhaps a sailboat would be more appropriate to finding the north star and add a fifth proposition: a participatory decision-making process that includes balanced feedback. This approach, though not new, can pose risks such as misaligned priorities and ineffective decisions. To navigate these challenges, the introduction of a "court jester" role is proposed, encouraging open dialogue and critical self-reflection. The flexibility akin to sailing, where adjustments are made based on feedback, is advocated for effective and dynamic foundation governance.