偏差与平均绝对偏差之间权衡的下限

Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.spl.2024.110182
Alexis Derumigny , Johannes Schmidt-Hieber
{"title":"偏差与平均绝对偏差之间权衡的下限","authors":"Alexis Derumigny ,&nbsp;Johannes Schmidt-Hieber","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In nonparametric statistics, rate-optimal estimators typically balance bias and stochastic error. The recent work on overparametrization raises the question whether rate-optimal estimators exist that do not obey this trade-off. In this work we consider pointwise estimation in the Gaussian white noise model with regression function <span><math><mi>f</mi></math></span> in a class of <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>-Hölder smooth functions. Let ’worst-case’ refer to the supremum over all functions <span><math><mi>f</mi></math></span> in the Hölder class. It is shown that any estimator with worst-case bias <span><math><mrow><mo>≲</mo><msup><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>β</mi><mo>/</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>2</mn><mi>β</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></msup><mo>≕</mo><msub><mrow><mi>ψ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> must necessarily also have a worst-case mean absolute deviation that is lower bounded by <span><math><mrow><mo>≳</mo><msub><mrow><mi>ψ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub><mo>.</mo></mrow></math></span> To derive the result, we establish abstract inequalities relating the change of expectation for two probability measures to the mean absolute deviation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001512/pdfft?md5=51662c001093a4b55185099a04b71ff2&pid=1-s2.0-S0167715224001512-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower bounds for the trade-off between bias and mean absolute deviation\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Derumigny ,&nbsp;Johannes Schmidt-Hieber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In nonparametric statistics, rate-optimal estimators typically balance bias and stochastic error. The recent work on overparametrization raises the question whether rate-optimal estimators exist that do not obey this trade-off. In this work we consider pointwise estimation in the Gaussian white noise model with regression function <span><math><mi>f</mi></math></span> in a class of <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>-Hölder smooth functions. Let ’worst-case’ refer to the supremum over all functions <span><math><mi>f</mi></math></span> in the Hölder class. It is shown that any estimator with worst-case bias <span><math><mrow><mo>≲</mo><msup><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>β</mi><mo>/</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>2</mn><mi>β</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></msup><mo>≕</mo><msub><mrow><mi>ψ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> must necessarily also have a worst-case mean absolute deviation that is lower bounded by <span><math><mrow><mo>≳</mo><msub><mrow><mi>ψ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub><mo>.</mo></mrow></math></span> To derive the result, we establish abstract inequalities relating the change of expectation for two probability measures to the mean absolute deviation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001512/pdfft?md5=51662c001093a4b55185099a04b71ff2&pid=1-s2.0-S0167715224001512-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非参数统计中,最优估计率通常会兼顾偏差和随机误差。最近关于超参数化的研究提出了一个问题:是否存在不服从这种权衡的最优估计率?在本研究中,我们将考虑在高斯白噪声模型中,用一类 β-Hölder 平滑函数中的回归函数 f 进行点估计。让 "最坏情况 "指的是 Hölder 类中所有函数 f 的上集。结果表明,任何具有最坏情况偏差≲n-β/(2β+1)≕ψn 的估计器,其最坏情况平均绝对偏差的下限必然也是≳ψn。为了推导出这一结果,我们建立了有关两个概率度量的期望变化与平均绝对偏差的抽象不等式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Lower bounds for the trade-off between bias and mean absolute deviation

In nonparametric statistics, rate-optimal estimators typically balance bias and stochastic error. The recent work on overparametrization raises the question whether rate-optimal estimators exist that do not obey this trade-off. In this work we consider pointwise estimation in the Gaussian white noise model with regression function f in a class of β-Hölder smooth functions. Let ’worst-case’ refer to the supremum over all functions f in the Hölder class. It is shown that any estimator with worst-case bias nβ/(2β+1)ψn must necessarily also have a worst-case mean absolute deviation that is lower bounded by ψn. To derive the result, we establish abstract inequalities relating the change of expectation for two probability measures to the mean absolute deviation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信