研究职前教师在混合现实模拟教学中的讨论表现与他们自我报告的目标和促进讨论的成功之间的联系

Devon Kinsey , Jamie N. Mikeska , Heather Howell , Pavneet Kaur Bharaj
{"title":"研究职前教师在混合现实模拟教学中的讨论表现与他们自我报告的目标和促进讨论的成功之间的联系","authors":"Devon Kinsey ,&nbsp;Jamie N. Mikeska ,&nbsp;Heather Howell ,&nbsp;Pavneet Kaur Bharaj","doi":"10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the growing use of mixed reality teaching simulations in teacher education there is a need for researchers to examine how preservice teacher (PST) learning can be supported when using these simulations. To address this gap the current study explores how 47 PSTs used an online teaching simulation to facilitate a discussion focused on argumentation with five student avatars in the <em>Mursion</em><sup><em>TM</em></sup> mixed reality simulated classroom environment. We assessed PSTs' performance in the simulation using rubric-level scores assigned by trained raters and then compared the scores to PSTs' survey responses completed after their discussion asking them to self-report their goals for the discussion, how successful they thought they were across five dimensions of facilitating high-quality, argumentation-focused discussions, and their overall perceptions of the mixed reality teaching simulation. Findings suggest that PSTs' understanding of the discussion task's learning goals somewhat predicted their success in facilitating the discussion and that PSTs' self-assessment of their performance was not always consistent with raters' evaluation of the PSTs' performance. In particular, self-assessment was found to be most consistent with raters' evaluations for those PSTs with higher rater-assigned scores and least consistent for those with lower rater-assigned scores. The implications of these findings are as follows: (1) researchers should be cautious in relying on PST self-report of success when engaging in mixed reality teaching simulations, particularly because low performance may be obscured, (2) teacher educators should be aware that reliance on self-report from PSTs likely obscures the need for additional support for exactly those PSTs who need it most, and (3) the field, therefore, should expand efforts to measure PSTs' performance when using mixed reality teaching simulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100320,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education: X Reality","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949678024000217/pdfft?md5=3d865ac78e9e914b228d0d169d1e40a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2949678024000217-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the connection between preservice teachers’ discussion performance in a mixed reality teaching simulation with their self-reported goals and success in facilitating discussions\",\"authors\":\"Devon Kinsey ,&nbsp;Jamie N. Mikeska ,&nbsp;Heather Howell ,&nbsp;Pavneet Kaur Bharaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the growing use of mixed reality teaching simulations in teacher education there is a need for researchers to examine how preservice teacher (PST) learning can be supported when using these simulations. To address this gap the current study explores how 47 PSTs used an online teaching simulation to facilitate a discussion focused on argumentation with five student avatars in the <em>Mursion</em><sup><em>TM</em></sup> mixed reality simulated classroom environment. We assessed PSTs' performance in the simulation using rubric-level scores assigned by trained raters and then compared the scores to PSTs' survey responses completed after their discussion asking them to self-report their goals for the discussion, how successful they thought they were across five dimensions of facilitating high-quality, argumentation-focused discussions, and their overall perceptions of the mixed reality teaching simulation. Findings suggest that PSTs' understanding of the discussion task's learning goals somewhat predicted their success in facilitating the discussion and that PSTs' self-assessment of their performance was not always consistent with raters' evaluation of the PSTs' performance. In particular, self-assessment was found to be most consistent with raters' evaluations for those PSTs with higher rater-assigned scores and least consistent for those with lower rater-assigned scores. The implications of these findings are as follows: (1) researchers should be cautious in relying on PST self-report of success when engaging in mixed reality teaching simulations, particularly because low performance may be obscured, (2) teacher educators should be aware that reliance on self-report from PSTs likely obscures the need for additional support for exactly those PSTs who need it most, and (3) the field, therefore, should expand efforts to measure PSTs' performance when using mixed reality teaching simulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education: X Reality\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949678024000217/pdfft?md5=3d865ac78e9e914b228d0d169d1e40a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2949678024000217-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education: X Reality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949678024000217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education: X Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949678024000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着混合现实教学模拟在师范教育中的应用越来越广泛,研究人员需要研究在使用这些模拟时如何支持职前教师(PST)的学习。为了弥补这一不足,本研究探讨了 47 名在职教师如何使用在线教学模拟,在 MursionTM 混合现实模拟课堂环境中与五个学生化身一起开展以论证为重点的讨论。我们使用训练有素的评分员给出的评分标准来评估 PST 在模拟教学中的表现,然后将这些评分与 PST 在讨论结束后填写的调查问卷进行比较,调查问卷要求 PST 自我报告他们的讨论目标、他们认为自己在促进以论证为重点的高质量讨论的五个方面的成功程度,以及他们对混合现实模拟教学的总体看法。研究结果表明,PSTs 对讨论任务学习目标的理解在一定程度上预示着他们在促进讨论方面的成功,而且 PSTs 对自己表现的自我评估与评分者对 PSTs 表现的评价并不总是一致的。特别是,对于那些评分者指定分数较高的 PST 来说,自我评估与评分者的评价最为一致,而对于那些评分者指定分数较低的 PST 来说,自我评估与评分者的评价最不一致。这些研究结果的意义如下(1) 研究人员在依赖 PST 自我报告参与混合现实模拟教学的成功时应谨慎,特别是因为低绩效可能会被掩盖;(2) 教师教育者应意识到,依赖 PST 的自我报告可能会掩盖对那些最需要额外支持的 PST 的需求;(3) 因此,该领域应扩大努力,测量 PST 在使用混合现实模拟教学时的绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the connection between preservice teachers’ discussion performance in a mixed reality teaching simulation with their self-reported goals and success in facilitating discussions

With the growing use of mixed reality teaching simulations in teacher education there is a need for researchers to examine how preservice teacher (PST) learning can be supported when using these simulations. To address this gap the current study explores how 47 PSTs used an online teaching simulation to facilitate a discussion focused on argumentation with five student avatars in the MursionTM mixed reality simulated classroom environment. We assessed PSTs' performance in the simulation using rubric-level scores assigned by trained raters and then compared the scores to PSTs' survey responses completed after their discussion asking them to self-report their goals for the discussion, how successful they thought they were across five dimensions of facilitating high-quality, argumentation-focused discussions, and their overall perceptions of the mixed reality teaching simulation. Findings suggest that PSTs' understanding of the discussion task's learning goals somewhat predicted their success in facilitating the discussion and that PSTs' self-assessment of their performance was not always consistent with raters' evaluation of the PSTs' performance. In particular, self-assessment was found to be most consistent with raters' evaluations for those PSTs with higher rater-assigned scores and least consistent for those with lower rater-assigned scores. The implications of these findings are as follows: (1) researchers should be cautious in relying on PST self-report of success when engaging in mixed reality teaching simulations, particularly because low performance may be obscured, (2) teacher educators should be aware that reliance on self-report from PSTs likely obscures the need for additional support for exactly those PSTs who need it most, and (3) the field, therefore, should expand efforts to measure PSTs' performance when using mixed reality teaching simulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信