Leonard H T Go, Kirsten S Almberg, Lee S Friedman, Lauren Zell-Baran, Cecile S Rose, Robert A Cohen
{"title":"测量肺弥散能力:改善煤矿工人医疗监测和残疾评估的契机。","authors":"Leonard H T Go, Kirsten S Almberg, Lee S Friedman, Lauren Zell-Baran, Cecile S Rose, Robert A Cohen","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Spirometry is the primary lung function test utilised for medical surveillance and disability examination for coal mine dust lung disease. However, spirometry likely underestimates physiologic impairment. We sought to characterise abnormalities of single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (D<sub>LCO</sub>) among a population of former coal miners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 3115 former coal miners evaluated at a West Virginia black lung clinic between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed to study the association between diffusion impairment (abnormally low D<sub>LCO</sub>), resting spirometry and the presence and severity of coal workers' pneumoconiosis on chest radiography. We developed ordinary least squares linear regression models to evaluate factors associated with per cent predicted D<sub>LCO</sub> (D<sub>LCO</sub>pp).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diffusion impairment was identified in 20.2% of subjects. Ten per cent of all miners with normal spirometry had diffusion impairment including 7.4% of never smokers. The prevalence of diffusion impairment increased with worsening radiographic category of pneumoconiosis. Mean D<sub>LCO</sub>pp decreased with increasing small opacity profusion subcategory in miners without progressive massive fibrosis. Linear regression analysis also showed significant decreases in D<sub>LCO</sub>pp with increasing small opacity profusion and presence of large opacities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diffusion impairment is common among former coal miners, including among never smokers, miners without radiographic pneumoconiosis and miners with normal spirometry. These findings demonstrate the value of including D<sub>LCO</sub> testing in disability examinations of former coal miners and an important role for its use in medical surveillance of working miners to detect early chronic lung disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"296-301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring lung diffusing capacity: an opportunity for improved medical surveillance and disability evaluation of coal miners.\",\"authors\":\"Leonard H T Go, Kirsten S Almberg, Lee S Friedman, Lauren Zell-Baran, Cecile S Rose, Robert A Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/oemed-2023-109380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Spirometry is the primary lung function test utilised for medical surveillance and disability examination for coal mine dust lung disease. However, spirometry likely underestimates physiologic impairment. We sought to characterise abnormalities of single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (D<sub>LCO</sub>) among a population of former coal miners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 3115 former coal miners evaluated at a West Virginia black lung clinic between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed to study the association between diffusion impairment (abnormally low D<sub>LCO</sub>), resting spirometry and the presence and severity of coal workers' pneumoconiosis on chest radiography. We developed ordinary least squares linear regression models to evaluate factors associated with per cent predicted D<sub>LCO</sub> (D<sub>LCO</sub>pp).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diffusion impairment was identified in 20.2% of subjects. Ten per cent of all miners with normal spirometry had diffusion impairment including 7.4% of never smokers. The prevalence of diffusion impairment increased with worsening radiographic category of pneumoconiosis. Mean D<sub>LCO</sub>pp decreased with increasing small opacity profusion subcategory in miners without progressive massive fibrosis. Linear regression analysis also showed significant decreases in D<sub>LCO</sub>pp with increasing small opacity profusion and presence of large opacities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diffusion impairment is common among former coal miners, including among never smokers, miners without radiographic pneumoconiosis and miners with normal spirometry. These findings demonstrate the value of including D<sub>LCO</sub> testing in disability examinations of former coal miners and an important role for its use in medical surveillance of working miners to detect early chronic lung disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"296-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109380\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring lung diffusing capacity: an opportunity for improved medical surveillance and disability evaluation of coal miners.
Objectives: Spirometry is the primary lung function test utilised for medical surveillance and disability examination for coal mine dust lung disease. However, spirometry likely underestimates physiologic impairment. We sought to characterise abnormalities of single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) among a population of former coal miners.
Methods: Data from 3115 former coal miners evaluated at a West Virginia black lung clinic between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed to study the association between diffusion impairment (abnormally low DLCO), resting spirometry and the presence and severity of coal workers' pneumoconiosis on chest radiography. We developed ordinary least squares linear regression models to evaluate factors associated with per cent predicted DLCO (DLCOpp).
Results: Diffusion impairment was identified in 20.2% of subjects. Ten per cent of all miners with normal spirometry had diffusion impairment including 7.4% of never smokers. The prevalence of diffusion impairment increased with worsening radiographic category of pneumoconiosis. Mean DLCOpp decreased with increasing small opacity profusion subcategory in miners without progressive massive fibrosis. Linear regression analysis also showed significant decreases in DLCOpp with increasing small opacity profusion and presence of large opacities.
Conclusions: Diffusion impairment is common among former coal miners, including among never smokers, miners without radiographic pneumoconiosis and miners with normal spirometry. These findings demonstrate the value of including DLCO testing in disability examinations of former coal miners and an important role for its use in medical surveillance of working miners to detect early chronic lung disease.
期刊介绍:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.