利用游离空肠转移进行全咽全喉切除术的重建技术。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1002/micr.31204
Takeaki Hidaka MD, Shimpei Miyamoto MD, PhD, Jun Oba MD, Kiichi Furuse MD, Azusa Oshima MD, Kazuto Matsuura MD, PhD, Takuya Higashino MD, PhD
{"title":"利用游离空肠转移进行全咽全喉切除术的重建技术。","authors":"Takeaki Hidaka MD,&nbsp;Shimpei Miyamoto MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jun Oba MD,&nbsp;Kiichi Furuse MD,&nbsp;Azusa Oshima MD,&nbsp;Kazuto Matsuura MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takuya Higashino MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/micr.31204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Total pharyngolaryngectomy is sometimes combined with total glossectomy for advanced hypopharyngeal or cervical esophageal cancers involving the tongue base. The optimal reconstruction method for total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy has not been established due to a considerable diameter mismatch between the floor of mouth and the esophageal stump. This report describes two reconstruction methods using free jejunal transfer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Five consecutive patients who underwent total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy were included, with a mean age of 67.0 (range 55–75) years. Primary tumors included tongue, hypopharyngeal, cervical esophagus, and laryngeal cancers. The mean defect size was 17.0 (16–19) × 6.8 (6–7) cm. Surgical techniques involved either a simple incision or a two-segment method to address the size mismatch between the jejunum and the floor of mouth. In the simple incision method, a longitudinal cut was made to the antimesenteric or paramesenteric border of a jejunum wall to expand the orifice. In the two-segment method, a jejunal graft was separated into two segments to reconstruct the floor of mouth and the cervical esophagus, and these segments were connected with a longitudinal incision to the cervical esophageal segment to form a funnel-shaped conduit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the five patients, three underwent the simple incision method and two the two-segment method. Postoperative pharyngoesophagography showed a smooth passage for all patients. Postoperative courses were uneventful except for one flap loss due to arterial thrombosis. Four patients achieved oral feeding, while one became gastric-tube dependent. At a mean follow-up of 22.1 (4–39) months, one patient required tube feeding, two tolerated full liquid, and two consumed a soft diet.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both the simple incision and two-segment methods achieved satisfactory swallowing function. The choice between these reconstruction methods may depend on the extent of resection of the posterior pharyngeal wall.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstruction techniques using free jejunal transfer for total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy\",\"authors\":\"Takeaki Hidaka MD,&nbsp;Shimpei Miyamoto MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jun Oba MD,&nbsp;Kiichi Furuse MD,&nbsp;Azusa Oshima MD,&nbsp;Kazuto Matsuura MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takuya Higashino MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/micr.31204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Total pharyngolaryngectomy is sometimes combined with total glossectomy for advanced hypopharyngeal or cervical esophageal cancers involving the tongue base. The optimal reconstruction method for total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy has not been established due to a considerable diameter mismatch between the floor of mouth and the esophageal stump. This report describes two reconstruction methods using free jejunal transfer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five consecutive patients who underwent total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy were included, with a mean age of 67.0 (range 55–75) years. Primary tumors included tongue, hypopharyngeal, cervical esophagus, and laryngeal cancers. The mean defect size was 17.0 (16–19) × 6.8 (6–7) cm. Surgical techniques involved either a simple incision or a two-segment method to address the size mismatch between the jejunum and the floor of mouth. In the simple incision method, a longitudinal cut was made to the antimesenteric or paramesenteric border of a jejunum wall to expand the orifice. In the two-segment method, a jejunal graft was separated into two segments to reconstruct the floor of mouth and the cervical esophagus, and these segments were connected with a longitudinal incision to the cervical esophageal segment to form a funnel-shaped conduit.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the five patients, three underwent the simple incision method and two the two-segment method. Postoperative pharyngoesophagography showed a smooth passage for all patients. Postoperative courses were uneventful except for one flap loss due to arterial thrombosis. Four patients achieved oral feeding, while one became gastric-tube dependent. At a mean follow-up of 22.1 (4–39) months, one patient required tube feeding, two tolerated full liquid, and two consumed a soft diet.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both the simple incision and two-segment methods achieved satisfactory swallowing function. The choice between these reconstruction methods may depend on the extent of resection of the posterior pharyngeal wall.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31204\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于涉及舌根的晚期下咽癌或颈食管癌,有时会将咽喉全切除术与全舌切除术结合起来。由于口底和食管残端之间存在相当大的直径不匹配,因此咽喉全切除术和全咽瓣切除术的最佳重建方法尚未确定。本报告介绍了两种使用游离空肠转移的重建方法:方法:连续纳入了五名接受全咽全喉切除术的患者,他们的平均年龄为 67.0 岁(55-75 岁)。原发肿瘤包括舌癌、下咽癌、颈食管癌和喉癌。平均缺损大小为 17.0 (16-19) × 6.8 (6-7) 厘米。手术技术包括简单切口法或双段法,以解决空肠和口底之间的大小不匹配问题。在简单切口法中,在空肠壁的肠前或肠旁边缘纵向切开,以扩大空肠口。在双段法中,空肠移植物被分离成两段,以重建口底和食管颈段,并用纵向切口将这两段与食管颈段连接起来,形成漏斗状导管:结果:五名患者中,三人采用了简单切口法,两人采用了双段法。术后咽喉食管造影显示所有患者的通道都很顺畅。除一名患者因动脉血栓导致皮瓣脱落外,其他患者术后恢复顺利。四名患者实现了经口进食,一名患者需要依赖胃管。在平均 22.1 个月(4-39 个月)的随访中,一名患者需要插管进食,两名患者可以进食全流食,两名患者进食软食:结论:简单切口法和双节段法都能达到令人满意的吞咽功能。这些重建方法的选择可能取决于咽后壁的切除范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconstruction techniques using free jejunal transfer for total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy

Background

Total pharyngolaryngectomy is sometimes combined with total glossectomy for advanced hypopharyngeal or cervical esophageal cancers involving the tongue base. The optimal reconstruction method for total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy has not been established due to a considerable diameter mismatch between the floor of mouth and the esophageal stump. This report describes two reconstruction methods using free jejunal transfer.

Methods

Five consecutive patients who underwent total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy were included, with a mean age of 67.0 (range 55–75) years. Primary tumors included tongue, hypopharyngeal, cervical esophagus, and laryngeal cancers. The mean defect size was 17.0 (16–19) × 6.8 (6–7) cm. Surgical techniques involved either a simple incision or a two-segment method to address the size mismatch between the jejunum and the floor of mouth. In the simple incision method, a longitudinal cut was made to the antimesenteric or paramesenteric border of a jejunum wall to expand the orifice. In the two-segment method, a jejunal graft was separated into two segments to reconstruct the floor of mouth and the cervical esophagus, and these segments were connected with a longitudinal incision to the cervical esophageal segment to form a funnel-shaped conduit.

Results

Of the five patients, three underwent the simple incision method and two the two-segment method. Postoperative pharyngoesophagography showed a smooth passage for all patients. Postoperative courses were uneventful except for one flap loss due to arterial thrombosis. Four patients achieved oral feeding, while one became gastric-tube dependent. At a mean follow-up of 22.1 (4–39) months, one patient required tube feeding, two tolerated full liquid, and two consumed a soft diet.

Conclusions

Both the simple incision and two-segment methods achieved satisfactory swallowing function. The choice between these reconstruction methods may depend on the extent of resection of the posterior pharyngeal wall.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信