体育活动计划干预对减少亲子二人组久坐行为的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Applied psychology. Health and well-being Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1111/aphw.12565
Zofia Szczuka, Ewa Kulis, Anna Banik, Monika Boberska, Maria Siwa, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Paulina Krzywicka, Natalia Paduszynska, Nina Knoll, Theda Radtke, Konstantin Schenkel, Genevieve F Dunton, Aleksandra Luszczynska
{"title":"体育活动计划干预对减少亲子二人组久坐行为的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Zofia Szczuka, Ewa Kulis, Anna Banik, Monika Boberska, Maria Siwa, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Paulina Krzywicka, Natalia Paduszynska, Nina Knoll, Theda Radtke, Konstantin Schenkel, Genevieve F Dunton, Aleksandra Luszczynska","doi":"10.1111/aphw.12565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effects of parent-child dyad interventions on behavior remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated if, compared with a control condition, three types of physical activity (PA) planning interventions (individual \"I-for-me,\" dyadic \"we-for-me,\" and collaborative \"we-for-us\") would reduce sedentary behavior (SB) time in parents and their children. The study involved 247 dyads comprising parents (aged 29-66) and their children (aged 9-15), randomized into one of the three types of PA planning-intervention arms or the control condition. Mixed models were applied to analyze data from a preregistered trial (NCT02713438) with the outcome of accelerometer-measured SB time, assessed at 1-week and 36-week follow-ups. Although children's SB remained unaffected by the planning interventions, a small reduction of SB time was found among parents in the collaborative (p = .048) and individual (p = .042) planning conditions. The effects were observed at the 1-week follow-up only. While short-term reductions in parents' SB were achieved, these were not sustained long-term. PA planning interventions delivered to parent-child dyads did not substantially reduce children's SB, which may be due to young people's needs of increased independence from their parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of physical activity planning interventions on reducing sedentary behavior in parent-child dyads: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zofia Szczuka, Ewa Kulis, Anna Banik, Monika Boberska, Maria Siwa, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Paulina Krzywicka, Natalia Paduszynska, Nina Knoll, Theda Radtke, Konstantin Schenkel, Genevieve F Dunton, Aleksandra Luszczynska\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aphw.12565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effects of parent-child dyad interventions on behavior remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated if, compared with a control condition, three types of physical activity (PA) planning interventions (individual \\\"I-for-me,\\\" dyadic \\\"we-for-me,\\\" and collaborative \\\"we-for-us\\\") would reduce sedentary behavior (SB) time in parents and their children. The study involved 247 dyads comprising parents (aged 29-66) and their children (aged 9-15), randomized into one of the three types of PA planning-intervention arms or the control condition. Mixed models were applied to analyze data from a preregistered trial (NCT02713438) with the outcome of accelerometer-measured SB time, assessed at 1-week and 36-week follow-ups. Although children's SB remained unaffected by the planning interventions, a small reduction of SB time was found among parents in the collaborative (p = .048) and individual (p = .042) planning conditions. The effects were observed at the 1-week follow-up only. While short-term reductions in parents' SB were achieved, these were not sustained long-term. PA planning interventions delivered to parent-child dyads did not substantially reduce children's SB, which may be due to young people's needs of increased independence from their parents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied psychology. Health and well-being\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied psychology. Health and well-being\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12565\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亲子关系干预对行为的影响尚不明确。这项随机对照试验调查了与对照条件相比,三种类型的体力活动(PA)规划干预(个人 "我为人人"、双人 "我为人人 "和合作 "我为人人")是否会减少父母及其子女的久坐行为(SB)时间。该研究涉及 247 个由父母(29-66 岁)和子女(9-15 岁)组成的二人组,他们被随机分配到三种类型的 PA 计划干预组或对照组中。混合模型用于分析一项预先登记的试验(NCT02713438)的数据,其结果是加速度计测量的SB时间,在1周和36周的随访中进行评估。虽然儿童的 SB 不受计划干预的影响,但在合作计划(p = .048)和个人计划(p = .042)条件下,家长的 SB 时间略有减少。这些影响仅在一周的随访中观察到。虽然短期内减少了家长的 SB,但这些效果并不能长期维持。针对亲子二人组的 PA 规划干预并没有显著降低儿童的 SB,这可能是由于年轻人需要从父母身边获得更多的独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of physical activity planning interventions on reducing sedentary behavior in parent-child dyads: A randomized controlled trial.

Effects of parent-child dyad interventions on behavior remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated if, compared with a control condition, three types of physical activity (PA) planning interventions (individual "I-for-me," dyadic "we-for-me," and collaborative "we-for-us") would reduce sedentary behavior (SB) time in parents and their children. The study involved 247 dyads comprising parents (aged 29-66) and their children (aged 9-15), randomized into one of the three types of PA planning-intervention arms or the control condition. Mixed models were applied to analyze data from a preregistered trial (NCT02713438) with the outcome of accelerometer-measured SB time, assessed at 1-week and 36-week follow-ups. Although children's SB remained unaffected by the planning interventions, a small reduction of SB time was found among parents in the collaborative (p = .048) and individual (p = .042) planning conditions. The effects were observed at the 1-week follow-up only. While short-term reductions in parents' SB were achieved, these were not sustained long-term. PA planning interventions delivered to parent-child dyads did not substantially reduce children's SB, which may be due to young people's needs of increased independence from their parents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信