基于涡度方程诊断的登陆台风 "勒基玛"(2019 年)多尺度相互作用分析

IF 2.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Wenbo Xue , Hui Yu , Shengming Tang
{"title":"基于涡度方程诊断的登陆台风 \"勒基玛\"(2019 年)多尺度相互作用分析","authors":"Wenbo Xue ,&nbsp;Hui Yu ,&nbsp;Shengming Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.tcrr.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To investigate the multiscale interaction characteristics of Landfall Typhoon Lekima (2019), this study analyzed the characteristics of the different scale vortex structure and interactions among different scales based on vorticity equation diagnosis. The analysis is based on the simulation results of the WRF model which has been thoroughly verified. The main results are as follows: the original vorticity dominated by the meso-α scale vorticity increases with height and then decreases, with maximum vorticity distributed at 900 hPa. The meso-β scale vorticity varies significantly with altitude, while the meso-γ scale vorticity field exhibits obvious positive vorticity below 850 hPa. The meso-α scale vorticity tendency primarily maintains negative, contributing significantly to the overall reduction in the original vorticity field over time. The increase in mid-to-upper-level (above 550 hPa) original vorticity is mainly related to the variations in the meso-β and meso-γ scale vorticity fields. The original vorticity dominated by the meso-α scale vorticity increases with height and then decreases, and the whole layer vorticity decreases over time. The meso-β scale vorticity varies significantly with altitude and time, while the meso-γ scale vorticity field consistently exhibits significant positive vorticity below 850 hPa. The vorticity equation diagnosis revealed that the primary source terms of the vorticity tendencies are the twisting and stretching terms, and the main sink terms being horizontal and vertical vorticity transport terms below 900 hPa. The source terms and sink terms exchange above 850 hPa. Scale separation results show that the primary contributions of all impact factors originate from the meso-α and meso-γ scale fields (accounting for over 80% of the total), with the contribution of the meso-α scale being less than that of the meso-γ scale and a notable contribution over 35.5% of the interactions between different scales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44442,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 136-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603224000304/pdfft?md5=37e0836a2d8087d5264fcc34af1ada95&pid=1-s2.0-S2225603224000304-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiscale interaction analysis of Landfall Typhoon Lekima (2019) based on vorticity equation diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Wenbo Xue ,&nbsp;Hui Yu ,&nbsp;Shengming Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tcrr.2024.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To investigate the multiscale interaction characteristics of Landfall Typhoon Lekima (2019), this study analyzed the characteristics of the different scale vortex structure and interactions among different scales based on vorticity equation diagnosis. The analysis is based on the simulation results of the WRF model which has been thoroughly verified. The main results are as follows: the original vorticity dominated by the meso-α scale vorticity increases with height and then decreases, with maximum vorticity distributed at 900 hPa. The meso-β scale vorticity varies significantly with altitude, while the meso-γ scale vorticity field exhibits obvious positive vorticity below 850 hPa. The meso-α scale vorticity tendency primarily maintains negative, contributing significantly to the overall reduction in the original vorticity field over time. The increase in mid-to-upper-level (above 550 hPa) original vorticity is mainly related to the variations in the meso-β and meso-γ scale vorticity fields. The original vorticity dominated by the meso-α scale vorticity increases with height and then decreases, and the whole layer vorticity decreases over time. The meso-β scale vorticity varies significantly with altitude and time, while the meso-γ scale vorticity field consistently exhibits significant positive vorticity below 850 hPa. The vorticity equation diagnosis revealed that the primary source terms of the vorticity tendencies are the twisting and stretching terms, and the main sink terms being horizontal and vertical vorticity transport terms below 900 hPa. The source terms and sink terms exchange above 850 hPa. Scale separation results show that the primary contributions of all impact factors originate from the meso-α and meso-γ scale fields (accounting for over 80% of the total), with the contribution of the meso-α scale being less than that of the meso-γ scale and a notable contribution over 35.5% of the interactions between different scales.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 136-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603224000304/pdfft?md5=37e0836a2d8087d5264fcc34af1ada95&pid=1-s2.0-S2225603224000304-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603224000304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603224000304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为研究登陆台风 "勒基玛"(2019)的多尺度相互作用特征,本研究基于涡度方程诊断分析了不同尺度涡旋结构特征及不同尺度间的相互作用。分析基于 WRF 模式的模拟结果,该模拟结果已得到充分验证。主要结果如下:以中-α尺度涡度为主的原始涡度随高度增加而增大,然后减小,最大涡度分布在900 hPa。中-β尺度涡度随高度变化明显,而中-γ尺度涡度场在 850 百帕以下呈现明显的正涡度。中-α尺度涡度主要保持负值趋势,对原始涡度场随时间推移的整体减小有显著作用。中高层(550 百帕以上)原始涡度的增加主要与中β和中γ尺度涡度场的变化有关。以中-α尺度涡度为主的原始涡度随高度增加而减小,整个层涡度随时间减小。中层-β尺度涡度随高度和时间变化显著,而中层-γ尺度涡度场在 850 hPa 以下始终表现出显著的正涡度。涡度方程分析表明,涡度趋势的主要源项是扭曲和伸展项,主要汇项是 900 hPa 以下的水平和垂直涡度输送项。在 850 百帕以上,源项和汇项发生了交换。尺度分离结果表明,所有影响因子的主要贡献来自中-α和中-γ尺度场(占总数的 80%以上),其中中-α尺度的贡献小于中-γ尺度,在不同尺度间的相互作用中,中-γ尺度的贡献显著,超过 35.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiscale interaction analysis of Landfall Typhoon Lekima (2019) based on vorticity equation diagnosis

To investigate the multiscale interaction characteristics of Landfall Typhoon Lekima (2019), this study analyzed the characteristics of the different scale vortex structure and interactions among different scales based on vorticity equation diagnosis. The analysis is based on the simulation results of the WRF model which has been thoroughly verified. The main results are as follows: the original vorticity dominated by the meso-α scale vorticity increases with height and then decreases, with maximum vorticity distributed at 900 hPa. The meso-β scale vorticity varies significantly with altitude, while the meso-γ scale vorticity field exhibits obvious positive vorticity below 850 hPa. The meso-α scale vorticity tendency primarily maintains negative, contributing significantly to the overall reduction in the original vorticity field over time. The increase in mid-to-upper-level (above 550 hPa) original vorticity is mainly related to the variations in the meso-β and meso-γ scale vorticity fields. The original vorticity dominated by the meso-α scale vorticity increases with height and then decreases, and the whole layer vorticity decreases over time. The meso-β scale vorticity varies significantly with altitude and time, while the meso-γ scale vorticity field consistently exhibits significant positive vorticity below 850 hPa. The vorticity equation diagnosis revealed that the primary source terms of the vorticity tendencies are the twisting and stretching terms, and the main sink terms being horizontal and vertical vorticity transport terms below 900 hPa. The source terms and sink terms exchange above 850 hPa. Scale separation results show that the primary contributions of all impact factors originate from the meso-α and meso-γ scale fields (accounting for over 80% of the total), with the contribution of the meso-α scale being less than that of the meso-γ scale and a notable contribution over 35.5% of the interactions between different scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
184
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Cyclone Research and Review is an international journal focusing on tropical cyclone monitoring, forecasting, and research as well as associated hydrological effects and disaster risk reduction. This journal is edited and published by the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee (TC) and the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the China Meteorology Administration (STI/CMA). Contributions from all tropical cyclone basins are welcome. Scope of the journal includes: • Reviews of tropical cyclones exhibiting unusual characteristics or behavior or resulting in disastrous impacts on Typhoon Committee Members and other regional WMO bodies • Advances in applied and basic tropical cyclone research or technology to improve tropical cyclone forecasts and warnings • Basic theoretical studies of tropical cyclones • Event reports, compelling images, and topic review reports of tropical cyclones • Impacts, risk assessments, and risk management techniques related to tropical cyclones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信