利用塑料闪烁体模拟数据进行放射源中子能谱分析的解卷积代码(MAXED、GRAVEL、MLEM)的性能

IF 1.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
A. Kanj , C. Lynde , F. Carrel , C. Frangville , C. Thiam , M. Ben Mosbah , J. Venara
{"title":"利用塑料闪烁体模拟数据进行放射源中子能谱分析的解卷积代码(MAXED、GRAVEL、MLEM)的性能","authors":"A. Kanj ,&nbsp;C. Lynde ,&nbsp;F. Carrel ,&nbsp;C. Frangville ,&nbsp;C. Thiam ,&nbsp;M. Ben Mosbah ,&nbsp;J. Venara","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neutron spectrometry plays a crucial role in decommissioning of nuclear sites and in ensuring the safety of workers from radiation exposure. In this study, we associate a proton recoil spectrometer made by a homemade plastic scintillator with triple discrimination capabilities (fast neutrons, thermal neutrons, and gamma rays) with deconvolution methods to obtain accurate measurements of neutron spectra. The purpose of this work is to test and evaluate the performance of three distinct deconvolution codes, namely MAXED (Maximum Entropy Deconvolution), GRAVEL, and MLEM (Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization), using two types of input spectra (flat and Watt spectrum). These deconvolution codes are applied to simulated data using the reference MCNP6.2 Monte Carlo code. Comparing the calculated mean squared error (MSE) performed by the three unfolding methods, we find that MLEM seems to perform better than MAXED and GRAVEL. Furthermore, given the calculated MSE values, the unfolded spectrum of Cf-252 is in better agreement with the standard reference spectrum by using Watt spectrum as input spectrum (MSE&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>−6</sup>) than using a flat spectrum (MSE&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>−6</sup>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of deconvolution codes (MAXED, GRAVEL, MLEM) for neutron spectrometry of radioactive source using plastic scintillator simulated data\",\"authors\":\"A. Kanj ,&nbsp;C. Lynde ,&nbsp;F. Carrel ,&nbsp;C. Frangville ,&nbsp;C. Thiam ,&nbsp;M. Ben Mosbah ,&nbsp;J. Venara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Neutron spectrometry plays a crucial role in decommissioning of nuclear sites and in ensuring the safety of workers from radiation exposure. In this study, we associate a proton recoil spectrometer made by a homemade plastic scintillator with triple discrimination capabilities (fast neutrons, thermal neutrons, and gamma rays) with deconvolution methods to obtain accurate measurements of neutron spectra. The purpose of this work is to test and evaluate the performance of three distinct deconvolution codes, namely MAXED (Maximum Entropy Deconvolution), GRAVEL, and MLEM (Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization), using two types of input spectra (flat and Watt spectrum). These deconvolution codes are applied to simulated data using the reference MCNP6.2 Monte Carlo code. Comparing the calculated mean squared error (MSE) performed by the three unfolding methods, we find that MLEM seems to perform better than MAXED and GRAVEL. Furthermore, given the calculated MSE values, the unfolded spectrum of Cf-252 is in better agreement with the standard reference spectrum by using Watt spectrum as input spectrum (MSE&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>−6</sup>) than using a flat spectrum (MSE&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>−6</sup>).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724001549\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724001549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中子能谱仪在核设施退役和确保工人安全免受辐射照射方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在这项研究中,我们将自制塑料闪烁体制成的质子反冲光谱仪与具有三重分辨能力(快中子、热中子和伽马射线)的解卷积方法结合起来,以获得中子光谱的精确测量结果。这项工作的目的是使用两种类型的输入光谱(平坦光谱和瓦特光谱)测试和评估三种不同的解卷积代码的性能,即 MAXED(最大熵解卷积)、GRAVEL 和 MLEM(最大似然期望最大化)。这些解卷积代码使用 MCNP6.2 Monte Carlo 代码应用于模拟数据。比较三种展开方法计算出的均方误差 (MSE),我们发现 MLEM 的性能似乎优于 MAXED 和 GRAVEL。此外,从计算出的 MSE 值来看,使用 Watt 光谱作为输入光谱(MSE<1.2 × 10-6)比使用平面光谱(MSE<1.3 × 10-6)得到的 Cf-252 展开光谱与标准参考光谱的一致性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of deconvolution codes (MAXED, GRAVEL, MLEM) for neutron spectrometry of radioactive source using plastic scintillator simulated data

Neutron spectrometry plays a crucial role in decommissioning of nuclear sites and in ensuring the safety of workers from radiation exposure. In this study, we associate a proton recoil spectrometer made by a homemade plastic scintillator with triple discrimination capabilities (fast neutrons, thermal neutrons, and gamma rays) with deconvolution methods to obtain accurate measurements of neutron spectra. The purpose of this work is to test and evaluate the performance of three distinct deconvolution codes, namely MAXED (Maximum Entropy Deconvolution), GRAVEL, and MLEM (Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization), using two types of input spectra (flat and Watt spectrum). These deconvolution codes are applied to simulated data using the reference MCNP6.2 Monte Carlo code. Comparing the calculated mean squared error (MSE) performed by the three unfolding methods, we find that MLEM seems to perform better than MAXED and GRAVEL. Furthermore, given the calculated MSE values, the unfolded spectrum of Cf-252 is in better agreement with the standard reference spectrum by using Watt spectrum as input spectrum (MSE<1.2 × 10−6) than using a flat spectrum (MSE<1.3 × 10−6).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Measurements
Radiation Measurements 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal. Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信