0-1knapsack问题的二元元启发式算法:性能分析、混合变体和实际应用

IF 5.2 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Mohamed Abdel-Basset , Reda Mohamed , Safaa Saber , Ibrahim M. Hezam , Karam M. Sallam , Ibrahim A. Hameed
{"title":"0-1knapsack问题的二元元启发式算法:性能分析、混合变体和实际应用","authors":"Mohamed Abdel-Basset ,&nbsp;Reda Mohamed ,&nbsp;Safaa Saber ,&nbsp;Ibrahim M. Hezam ,&nbsp;Karam M. Sallam ,&nbsp;Ibrahim A. Hameed","doi":"10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the performance of three binary metaheuristic algorithms when applied to two distinct knapsack problems (0–1 knapsack problems (KP01) and multidimensional knapsack problems (MKP)). These binary algorithms are based on the classical mantis search algorithm (MSA), the classical quadratic interpolation optimization (QIO) method, and the well-known differential evolution (DE). Because these algorithms were designed for continuous optimization problems, they could not be used directly to solve binary knapsack problems. As a result, the V-shaped and S-shaped transfer functions are used to propose binary variants of these algorithms, such as binary differential evolution (BDE), binary quadratic interpolation optimization (BQIO), and binary mantis search algorithm (BMSA). These binary variants are evaluated using various high-dimensional KP01 examples and compared to several classical metaheuristic techniques to determine their efficacy. To enhance the performance of those binary algorithms, they are combined with repair operator 2 (RO2) to offer better hybrid variants, namely HMSA, HQIO, and HDE. Those hybrid algorithms are evaluated using several medium- and large-scale KP01 and MKP instances, as well as compared to other hybrid algorithms, to demonstrate their effectiveness. This comparison is conducted using three performance metrics: average fitness value, Friedman mean rank, and computational cost. The experimental findings demonstrate that HQIO is a strong alternative for solving KP01 and MKP. In addition, the proposed algorithms are applied to the Merkle-Hellman Knapsack Cryptosystem and the resource allocation problem in adaptive multimedia systems (AMS) to illustrate their effectiveness when applied to optimize those real applications. The experimental findings illustrate that the proposed HQIO is a strong alternative for handling various knapsack-based applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences","volume":"36 6","pages":"Article 102093"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157824001824/pdfft?md5=eecc477cb95abd1cca413bd63da31783&pid=1-s2.0-S1319157824001824-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Binary metaheuristic algorithms for 0–1 knapsack problems: Performance analysis, hybrid variants, and real-world application\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdel-Basset ,&nbsp;Reda Mohamed ,&nbsp;Safaa Saber ,&nbsp;Ibrahim M. Hezam ,&nbsp;Karam M. Sallam ,&nbsp;Ibrahim A. Hameed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines the performance of three binary metaheuristic algorithms when applied to two distinct knapsack problems (0–1 knapsack problems (KP01) and multidimensional knapsack problems (MKP)). These binary algorithms are based on the classical mantis search algorithm (MSA), the classical quadratic interpolation optimization (QIO) method, and the well-known differential evolution (DE). Because these algorithms were designed for continuous optimization problems, they could not be used directly to solve binary knapsack problems. As a result, the V-shaped and S-shaped transfer functions are used to propose binary variants of these algorithms, such as binary differential evolution (BDE), binary quadratic interpolation optimization (BQIO), and binary mantis search algorithm (BMSA). These binary variants are evaluated using various high-dimensional KP01 examples and compared to several classical metaheuristic techniques to determine their efficacy. To enhance the performance of those binary algorithms, they are combined with repair operator 2 (RO2) to offer better hybrid variants, namely HMSA, HQIO, and HDE. Those hybrid algorithms are evaluated using several medium- and large-scale KP01 and MKP instances, as well as compared to other hybrid algorithms, to demonstrate their effectiveness. This comparison is conducted using three performance metrics: average fitness value, Friedman mean rank, and computational cost. The experimental findings demonstrate that HQIO is a strong alternative for solving KP01 and MKP. In addition, the proposed algorithms are applied to the Merkle-Hellman Knapsack Cryptosystem and the resource allocation problem in adaptive multimedia systems (AMS) to illustrate their effectiveness when applied to optimize those real applications. The experimental findings illustrate that the proposed HQIO is a strong alternative for handling various knapsack-based applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157824001824/pdfft?md5=eecc477cb95abd1cca413bd63da31783&pid=1-s2.0-S1319157824001824-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157824001824\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157824001824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了三种二元元启发式算法在应用于两个不同的knapsack问题(0-1 knapsack问题(KP01)和多维knapsack问题(MKP))时的性能。这些二元算法基于经典的螳螂搜索算法(MSA)、经典的二次插值优化法(QIO)和著名的微分演化法(DE)。由于这些算法都是针对连续优化问题设计的,因此无法直接用于解决二元组合包问题。因此,我们利用 V 型和 S 型传递函数提出了这些算法的二进制变体,如二进制微分进化算法(BDE)、二进制二次插值优化算法(BQIO)和二进制螳螂搜索算法(BMSA)。我们使用各种高维 KP01 示例对这些二进制变体进行了评估,并将其与几种经典的元启发式技术进行了比较,以确定其功效。为了提高这些二进制算法的性能,我们将它们与修复算子 2(RO2)相结合,以提供更好的混合变体,即 HMSA、HQIO 和 HDE。这些混合算法通过几个中型和大型 KP01 和 MKP 实例进行评估,并与其他混合算法进行比较,以证明其有效性。比较使用了三个性能指标:平均适合度值、弗里德曼平均等级和计算成本。实验结果表明,HQIO 是解决 KP01 和 MKP 的有力替代方案。此外,我们还将所提出的算法应用于 Merkle-Hellman Knapsack 密码系统和自适应多媒体系统(AMS)中的资源分配问题,以说明这些算法在应用于优化这些实际应用时的有效性。实验结果表明,所提出的 HQIO 是处理各种基于 Knapsack 的应用的有力替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Binary metaheuristic algorithms for 0–1 knapsack problems: Performance analysis, hybrid variants, and real-world application

This paper examines the performance of three binary metaheuristic algorithms when applied to two distinct knapsack problems (0–1 knapsack problems (KP01) and multidimensional knapsack problems (MKP)). These binary algorithms are based on the classical mantis search algorithm (MSA), the classical quadratic interpolation optimization (QIO) method, and the well-known differential evolution (DE). Because these algorithms were designed for continuous optimization problems, they could not be used directly to solve binary knapsack problems. As a result, the V-shaped and S-shaped transfer functions are used to propose binary variants of these algorithms, such as binary differential evolution (BDE), binary quadratic interpolation optimization (BQIO), and binary mantis search algorithm (BMSA). These binary variants are evaluated using various high-dimensional KP01 examples and compared to several classical metaheuristic techniques to determine their efficacy. To enhance the performance of those binary algorithms, they are combined with repair operator 2 (RO2) to offer better hybrid variants, namely HMSA, HQIO, and HDE. Those hybrid algorithms are evaluated using several medium- and large-scale KP01 and MKP instances, as well as compared to other hybrid algorithms, to demonstrate their effectiveness. This comparison is conducted using three performance metrics: average fitness value, Friedman mean rank, and computational cost. The experimental findings demonstrate that HQIO is a strong alternative for solving KP01 and MKP. In addition, the proposed algorithms are applied to the Merkle-Hellman Knapsack Cryptosystem and the resource allocation problem in adaptive multimedia systems (AMS) to illustrate their effectiveness when applied to optimize those real applications. The experimental findings illustrate that the proposed HQIO is a strong alternative for handling various knapsack-based applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
656
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: In 2022 the Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences will become an author paid open access journal. Authors who submit their manuscript after October 31st 2021 will be asked to pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) after acceptance of their paper to make their work immediately, permanently, and freely accessible to all. The Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences is a refereed, international journal that covers all aspects of both foundations of computer and its practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信