长期睡眠者的不良健康后果:社会睡眠限制假说

IF 11.2 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Thomas J. Balkin , Guido Simonelli , Samantha Riedy
{"title":"长期睡眠者的不良健康后果:社会睡眠限制假说","authors":"Thomas J. Balkin ,&nbsp;Guido Simonelli ,&nbsp;Samantha Riedy","doi":"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Society imposes work and school schedules, as well as social expectations, that militate against consistently obtaining more than 7–9 h of sleep every 24 h. For most but not all adults this sleep duration is adequate. But among those who consistently obtain more than 9 h of sleep per day (“long sleepers”), there likely exists a subpopulation of individuals who are nevertheless failing to obtain enough sleep to satisfy their physiological sleep needs – a consequence of “restricting” their daily sleep durations to whatever extent they can tolerate so as to conform as closely as possible to society's norms and expectations. It is hypothesized that the ‘long sleep arm’ of the seemingly paradoxical U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and negative health outcomes can be explained, at least in part, by the existence of a subpopulation of such ‘sleep-restricted long sleepers.’</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49513,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101968"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negative health outcomes in long sleepers: The societal sleep restriction hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Balkin ,&nbsp;Guido Simonelli ,&nbsp;Samantha Riedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Society imposes work and school schedules, as well as social expectations, that militate against consistently obtaining more than 7–9 h of sleep every 24 h. For most but not all adults this sleep duration is adequate. But among those who consistently obtain more than 9 h of sleep per day (“long sleepers”), there likely exists a subpopulation of individuals who are nevertheless failing to obtain enough sleep to satisfy their physiological sleep needs – a consequence of “restricting” their daily sleep durations to whatever extent they can tolerate so as to conform as closely as possible to society's norms and expectations. It is hypothesized that the ‘long sleep arm’ of the seemingly paradoxical U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and negative health outcomes can be explained, at least in part, by the existence of a subpopulation of such ‘sleep-restricted long sleepers.’</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224000728\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224000728","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会施加的工作和学习时间安排以及社会期望,不利于人们坚持每 24 小时获得 7-9 小时以上的睡眠时间。但是,在那些每天睡眠时间持续超过 9 小时的人("长睡眠者")中,很可能存在这样一个亚群体,他们无法获得足够的睡眠来满足其生理睡眠需求--这是在他们能够忍受的范围内 "限制 "每天睡眠时间的结果,以便尽可能地符合社会规范和期望。我们假设,睡眠时间与不良健康后果之间看似矛盾的 U 型关系中的 "长睡眠臂",至少可以部分地解释为存在着这样一个 "限制睡眠的长睡眠者 "亚群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negative health outcomes in long sleepers: The societal sleep restriction hypothesis

Society imposes work and school schedules, as well as social expectations, that militate against consistently obtaining more than 7–9 h of sleep every 24 h. For most but not all adults this sleep duration is adequate. But among those who consistently obtain more than 9 h of sleep per day (“long sleepers”), there likely exists a subpopulation of individuals who are nevertheless failing to obtain enough sleep to satisfy their physiological sleep needs – a consequence of “restricting” their daily sleep durations to whatever extent they can tolerate so as to conform as closely as possible to society's norms and expectations. It is hypothesized that the ‘long sleep arm’ of the seemingly paradoxical U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and negative health outcomes can be explained, at least in part, by the existence of a subpopulation of such ‘sleep-restricted long sleepers.’

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Sleep Medicine Reviews 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine Reviews offers global coverage of sleep disorders, exploring their origins, diagnosis, treatment, and implications for related conditions at both individual and public health levels. Articles comprehensively review clinical information from peer-reviewed journals across various disciplines in sleep medicine, encompassing pulmonology, psychiatry, psychology, physiology, otolaryngology, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiology, dentistry, nursing, neurology, and general medicine. The journal features narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and editorials addressing areas of controversy, debate, and future research within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信