烧伤患者的粘弹性止血试验有助于预测预后吗?- 病例报告和文献综述

Q3 Medicine
Joeri Slob , Stephan A. Loer , Seppe S.H.A. Koopman , Cornelis H. van der Vlies
{"title":"烧伤患者的粘弹性止血试验有助于预测预后吗?- 病例报告和文献综述","authors":"Joeri Slob ,&nbsp;Stephan A. Loer ,&nbsp;Seppe S.H.A. Koopman ,&nbsp;Cornelis H. van der Vlies","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Burn injuries can cause multiple burn-induced coagulopathies. Viscoelastic haemostatic tests received increasing attention in coagulation monitoring as a tool to evaluate the haemostatic function of whole blood. Their exact role in burn patients remains unclear. We wondered whether the results of viscoelastic haemostatic tests are correlated with patient outcome. We present a case report as well as the results of a literature review of studies addressing the relationship of viscoelastic haemostatic tests and patient outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Case</h3><p>We report the case of a 77 year old patient who had suffered flame burns to the chest, abdomen, neck and upper arms accounting for 16 % of the body surface area. One week after burn the patient underwent extensive burn surgery. Repeated perioperative viscoelastic coagulation testing with rotational thromboelastometry showed rapidly changing haemostatic states ranging from hyper- to hypocoagulability. Despite prophylactic use of anticoagulation, the patient developed pulmonary embolism on the second postoperative day. This case highlights the importance of close haemostatic monitoring of patients with burn-induced coagulopathies.</p></div><div><h3>Principal results</h3><p>We identified four studies addressing the relationship between viscoelastic tests and outcome in burn patients, two prospective observational studies and two retrospective cohort studies. Two studies generated prediction models identifying predictors of mortality or complications. Maximum amplitude during viscoelastic testing was found to be an independent outcome predictor in both prediction models. Two other studies suggest that fibrinolysis at 30 min during viscoelastic testing was associated with mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Haemostatic management of patients with burn-induced coagulopathies remains challenging. We suggest that viscoelastic haemostatic tests can help to guide clinical decisions. Specific markers, such as maximal strength of the clot and lysis at 30 min after the time of maximal clot strength have been associated with increased mortality. Future research should explore the exact role of viscoelastic haemostatic testing in burn patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000397/pdfft?md5=e0e2bf92a14167933483fef54f1dbf1e&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000397-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can viscoelastic haemostatic tests in burn patients help to predict outcome? – A case report and narrative review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Joeri Slob ,&nbsp;Stephan A. Loer ,&nbsp;Seppe S.H.A. Koopman ,&nbsp;Cornelis H. van der Vlies\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Burn injuries can cause multiple burn-induced coagulopathies. Viscoelastic haemostatic tests received increasing attention in coagulation monitoring as a tool to evaluate the haemostatic function of whole blood. Their exact role in burn patients remains unclear. We wondered whether the results of viscoelastic haemostatic tests are correlated with patient outcome. We present a case report as well as the results of a literature review of studies addressing the relationship of viscoelastic haemostatic tests and patient outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Case</h3><p>We report the case of a 77 year old patient who had suffered flame burns to the chest, abdomen, neck and upper arms accounting for 16 % of the body surface area. One week after burn the patient underwent extensive burn surgery. Repeated perioperative viscoelastic coagulation testing with rotational thromboelastometry showed rapidly changing haemostatic states ranging from hyper- to hypocoagulability. Despite prophylactic use of anticoagulation, the patient developed pulmonary embolism on the second postoperative day. This case highlights the importance of close haemostatic monitoring of patients with burn-induced coagulopathies.</p></div><div><h3>Principal results</h3><p>We identified four studies addressing the relationship between viscoelastic tests and outcome in burn patients, two prospective observational studies and two retrospective cohort studies. Two studies generated prediction models identifying predictors of mortality or complications. Maximum amplitude during viscoelastic testing was found to be an independent outcome predictor in both prediction models. Two other studies suggest that fibrinolysis at 30 min during viscoelastic testing was associated with mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Haemostatic management of patients with burn-induced coagulopathies remains challenging. We suggest that viscoelastic haemostatic tests can help to guide clinical decisions. Specific markers, such as maximal strength of the clot and lysis at 30 min after the time of maximal clot strength have been associated with increased mortality. Future research should explore the exact role of viscoelastic haemostatic testing in burn patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000397/pdfft?md5=e0e2bf92a14167933483fef54f1dbf1e&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000397-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景烧伤可导致多种烧伤引起的凝血病。粘弹性止血试验作为一种评估全血止血功能的工具,在凝血监测中受到越来越多的关注。它们在烧伤患者中的确切作用仍不清楚。我们想知道粘弹性止血试验的结果是否与患者的预后相关。我们提供了一份病例报告,并对粘弹性止血测试与患者预后关系的研究结果进行了文献综述。病例我们报告了一名 77 岁患者的病例,患者胸部、腹部、颈部和上臂被火焰烧伤,烧伤面积占体表面积的 16%。烧伤一周后,患者接受了大面积烧伤手术。通过旋转血栓弹力测定法反复进行的围手术期粘弹性凝血测试显示,患者的止血状态从高凝状态迅速转变为低凝状态。尽管预防性使用了抗凝药物,患者还是在术后第二天出现了肺栓塞。本病例强调了对烧伤引起的凝血功能障碍患者进行密切止血监测的重要性。主要结果我们发现有四项研究探讨了粘弹性测试与烧伤患者预后之间的关系,其中两项为前瞻性观察研究,两项为回顾性队列研究。两项研究建立了预测模型,确定了死亡率或并发症的预测因素。在这两个预测模型中,粘弹性测试期间的最大振幅都是独立的预后预测因子。另外两项研究表明,粘弹性测试期间 30 分钟的纤维蛋白溶解与死亡率有关。我们认为粘弹性止血测试有助于指导临床决策。血凝块最大强度和血凝块最大强度后 30 分钟的溶解度等特定指标与死亡率增加有关。未来的研究应探索粘弹性止血测试在烧伤患者中的确切作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can viscoelastic haemostatic tests in burn patients help to predict outcome? – A case report and narrative review of the literature

Background

Burn injuries can cause multiple burn-induced coagulopathies. Viscoelastic haemostatic tests received increasing attention in coagulation monitoring as a tool to evaluate the haemostatic function of whole blood. Their exact role in burn patients remains unclear. We wondered whether the results of viscoelastic haemostatic tests are correlated with patient outcome. We present a case report as well as the results of a literature review of studies addressing the relationship of viscoelastic haemostatic tests and patient outcome.

Case

We report the case of a 77 year old patient who had suffered flame burns to the chest, abdomen, neck and upper arms accounting for 16 % of the body surface area. One week after burn the patient underwent extensive burn surgery. Repeated perioperative viscoelastic coagulation testing with rotational thromboelastometry showed rapidly changing haemostatic states ranging from hyper- to hypocoagulability. Despite prophylactic use of anticoagulation, the patient developed pulmonary embolism on the second postoperative day. This case highlights the importance of close haemostatic monitoring of patients with burn-induced coagulopathies.

Principal results

We identified four studies addressing the relationship between viscoelastic tests and outcome in burn patients, two prospective observational studies and two retrospective cohort studies. Two studies generated prediction models identifying predictors of mortality or complications. Maximum amplitude during viscoelastic testing was found to be an independent outcome predictor in both prediction models. Two other studies suggest that fibrinolysis at 30 min during viscoelastic testing was associated with mortality.

Conclusions

Haemostatic management of patients with burn-induced coagulopathies remains challenging. We suggest that viscoelastic haemostatic tests can help to guide clinical decisions. Specific markers, such as maximal strength of the clot and lysis at 30 min after the time of maximal clot strength have been associated with increased mortality. Future research should explore the exact role of viscoelastic haemostatic testing in burn patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信