{"title":"震撼广告:一种有争议的广告手法的发展轨迹","authors":"Thao Bui-Nguyen, Roland Canu","doi":"10.1177/20515707241243159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to look back at a controversial advertising technique recognized today as an ordinary advertising tool: shockvertising. Using a historical approach, we have built an analytical corpus that covers more than a century of research published in Marketing and advertising on the use of shock. A qualitative examination of this corpus has enabled us to sketch an institutional trajectory for shockvertising, dividing its evolution into several periods. We can thus observe the gradual acceptance of a technique initially condemned by the first advertising professionals, then the segmentation of this technique and its gradual assignment to specific marketing territories, and finally, the questioning of its effectiveness and criticism of its acceptability by new consumer figures anxious to defend and express specific social values. This review provides an overview of current knowledge and opens up new research perspectives on the theme of shockvertising.","PeriodicalId":509922,"journal":{"name":"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)","volume":"12 18","pages":"30 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shockvertising: Trajectory of a controversial advertising technique\",\"authors\":\"Thao Bui-Nguyen, Roland Canu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20515707241243159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to look back at a controversial advertising technique recognized today as an ordinary advertising tool: shockvertising. Using a historical approach, we have built an analytical corpus that covers more than a century of research published in Marketing and advertising on the use of shock. A qualitative examination of this corpus has enabled us to sketch an institutional trajectory for shockvertising, dividing its evolution into several periods. We can thus observe the gradual acceptance of a technique initially condemned by the first advertising professionals, then the segmentation of this technique and its gradual assignment to specific marketing territories, and finally, the questioning of its effectiveness and criticism of its acceptability by new consumer figures anxious to defend and express specific social values. This review provides an overview of current knowledge and opens up new research perspectives on the theme of shockvertising.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"12 18\",\"pages\":\"30 - 55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707241243159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707241243159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shockvertising: Trajectory of a controversial advertising technique
This article aims to look back at a controversial advertising technique recognized today as an ordinary advertising tool: shockvertising. Using a historical approach, we have built an analytical corpus that covers more than a century of research published in Marketing and advertising on the use of shock. A qualitative examination of this corpus has enabled us to sketch an institutional trajectory for shockvertising, dividing its evolution into several periods. We can thus observe the gradual acceptance of a technique initially condemned by the first advertising professionals, then the segmentation of this technique and its gradual assignment to specific marketing territories, and finally, the questioning of its effectiveness and criticism of its acceptability by new consumer figures anxious to defend and express specific social values. This review provides an overview of current knowledge and opens up new research perspectives on the theme of shockvertising.