Lili Sun , Yutong Lu , Yanfang Zhang , Chan Jin , Zhenwei Yuan , Renhua Xu
{"title":"伴有心血管疾病的肺癌切除术患者术后康复(ERAS)失败的风险因素:单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Lili Sun , Yutong Lu , Yanfang Zhang , Chan Jin , Zhenwei Yuan , Renhua Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in patients with lung cancer, and its effectiveness has been confirmed; however, some lung cancers with poor clinical outcomes lead to ERAS failure after radical resection. This study aimed to analyze risk factors associated with ERAS failure after radical resection in patients with lung cancer and concomitant cardiovascular disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 198 patients who underwent ERAS following radical lung cancer surgery for concomitant cardiovascular disease between January 2022 and September 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the definition of ERAS failure: ERAS success group (<em>n</em> = 152) and ERAS failure group (<em>n</em> = 46). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of ERAS failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Univariate analysis showed that gender, tumor location, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), suction drainage, and total cholesterol were associated with ERAS failure. Multivariate analysis showed that operation time (odds ratio [OR] = 1.015; <em>P</em> = 0.011) and suction drainage (OR = 3.343; <em>P</em> = 0.008) were independent risk factors for ERAS failure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Operation time and suction drainage were independent risk factors for ERAS failure after radical resection of combined cardiovascular lung cancer. Therefore, improving surgical efficiency and postoperative chest drain management are important for successful ERAS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524001549/pdfft?md5=063fbfa261452ed9b0f2f314a6e1119a&pid=1-s2.0-S2347562524001549-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for enhanced recovery after surgery failure in patients undergoing lung cancer resection with concomitant cardiovascular disease: A single-center retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Lili Sun , Yutong Lu , Yanfang Zhang , Chan Jin , Zhenwei Yuan , Renhua Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in patients with lung cancer, and its effectiveness has been confirmed; however, some lung cancers with poor clinical outcomes lead to ERAS failure after radical resection. This study aimed to analyze risk factors associated with ERAS failure after radical resection in patients with lung cancer and concomitant cardiovascular disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 198 patients who underwent ERAS following radical lung cancer surgery for concomitant cardiovascular disease between January 2022 and September 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the definition of ERAS failure: ERAS success group (<em>n</em> = 152) and ERAS failure group (<em>n</em> = 46). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of ERAS failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Univariate analysis showed that gender, tumor location, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), suction drainage, and total cholesterol were associated with ERAS failure. Multivariate analysis showed that operation time (odds ratio [OR] = 1.015; <em>P</em> = 0.011) and suction drainage (OR = 3.343; <em>P</em> = 0.008) were independent risk factors for ERAS failure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Operation time and suction drainage were independent risk factors for ERAS failure after radical resection of combined cardiovascular lung cancer. Therefore, improving surgical efficiency and postoperative chest drain management are important for successful ERAS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524001549/pdfft?md5=063fbfa261452ed9b0f2f314a6e1119a&pid=1-s2.0-S2347562524001549-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524001549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524001549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的术后增强康复(ERAS)已广泛应用于肺癌患者,其有效性已得到证实;然而,一些临床疗效不佳的肺癌患者在根治性切除术后会导致ERAS失败。本研究旨在分析肺癌并发心血管疾病患者根治性切除术后ERAS失败的相关风险因素。方法:本回顾性研究共纳入了2022年1月至2023年9月期间因并发心血管疾病接受肺癌根治术后ERAS的198例患者。根据ERAS失败的定义,这些患者被分为两组:ERAS成功组(152人)和ERAS失败组(46人)。结果单变量分析显示,性别、肿瘤位置、手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、抽吸引流和总胆固醇与ERAS失败有关。多变量分析显示,手术时间(比值比 [OR] = 1.015; P = 0.011)和抽吸引流(比值比 [OR] = 3.343; P = 0.008)是ERAS失败的独立风险因素。因此,提高手术效率和术后胸腔引流管理对 ERAS 的成功非常重要。
Risk factors for enhanced recovery after surgery failure in patients undergoing lung cancer resection with concomitant cardiovascular disease: A single-center retrospective study
Objective
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in patients with lung cancer, and its effectiveness has been confirmed; however, some lung cancers with poor clinical outcomes lead to ERAS failure after radical resection. This study aimed to analyze risk factors associated with ERAS failure after radical resection in patients with lung cancer and concomitant cardiovascular disease.
Methods
In total, 198 patients who underwent ERAS following radical lung cancer surgery for concomitant cardiovascular disease between January 2022 and September 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the definition of ERAS failure: ERAS success group (n = 152) and ERAS failure group (n = 46). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of ERAS failure.
Results
Univariate analysis showed that gender, tumor location, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), suction drainage, and total cholesterol were associated with ERAS failure. Multivariate analysis showed that operation time (odds ratio [OR] = 1.015; P = 0.011) and suction drainage (OR = 3.343; P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for ERAS failure.
Conclusions
Operation time and suction drainage were independent risk factors for ERAS failure after radical resection of combined cardiovascular lung cancer. Therefore, improving surgical efficiency and postoperative chest drain management are important for successful ERAS.