{"title":"主动干扰任务中脑电图活动主要时空成分的年龄差异。","authors":"Harry T.A. Moore , Adriana Sampaio , Diego Pinal","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Proactive interference (PI) is the disruptive effect of no longer relevant information on current working memory (WM) processing. PI effects in EEG data have been previously found to be altered in healthy aging, although it remains unclear the extent to which such changes reflect delayed or different brain mechanisms employed to overcome PI. Hence, we had twenty-six young (18–34 years) and sixteen old (53–68 years) healthy adults complete a Recent Probes task while EEG was recorded. Compared to young adults, old adults were slower, less accurate and less able to discriminate when they last saw a given stimulus, but PI effects on reaction time were greater in the former, likely due to a general difficulty that old adults had in the task. Temporo-spatial principal component analysis of the EEG data showed young and older adults to differ in terms of temporal and spatial characteristics of brain activity associated with resolving PI. YA showed a factor indicative of a medial frontal negativity (MFN) that showed greater amplitude in low compared to high PI trials. OA, in contrast, showed a late positive component (LPC), although similarly with larger amplitude in low compared to high PI trials. The modulation of the MFN component in YA may reflect the recruitment of cognitive control to overcome PI. The modulation of the LPC in OA may represent the detection of conflict between familiarity and context recollection during PI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 108828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000875/pdfft?md5=9f90da92b42e2605f40fe756157c939b&pid=1-s2.0-S0301051124000875-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age differences in the principal temporo-spatial components of EEG activity during a proactive interference task\",\"authors\":\"Harry T.A. Moore , Adriana Sampaio , Diego Pinal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Proactive interference (PI) is the disruptive effect of no longer relevant information on current working memory (WM) processing. PI effects in EEG data have been previously found to be altered in healthy aging, although it remains unclear the extent to which such changes reflect delayed or different brain mechanisms employed to overcome PI. Hence, we had twenty-six young (18–34 years) and sixteen old (53–68 years) healthy adults complete a Recent Probes task while EEG was recorded. Compared to young adults, old adults were slower, less accurate and less able to discriminate when they last saw a given stimulus, but PI effects on reaction time were greater in the former, likely due to a general difficulty that old adults had in the task. Temporo-spatial principal component analysis of the EEG data showed young and older adults to differ in terms of temporal and spatial characteristics of brain activity associated with resolving PI. YA showed a factor indicative of a medial frontal negativity (MFN) that showed greater amplitude in low compared to high PI trials. OA, in contrast, showed a late positive component (LPC), although similarly with larger amplitude in low compared to high PI trials. The modulation of the MFN component in YA may reflect the recruitment of cognitive control to overcome PI. The modulation of the LPC in OA may represent the detection of conflict between familiarity and context recollection during PI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108828\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000875/pdfft?md5=9f90da92b42e2605f40fe756157c939b&pid=1-s2.0-S0301051124000875-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000875\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
主动干扰(PI)是指不再相关的信息对当前工作记忆(WM)处理的干扰作用。以前曾发现脑电图数据中的主动干扰效应在健康的老龄化过程中会发生变化,但这种变化在多大程度上反映了克服主动干扰的延迟或不同的大脑机制仍不清楚。因此,我们让二十六名年轻(18-34 岁)和十六名年老(53-68 岁)的健康成年人在记录脑电图的同时完成一项 "最近探究 "任务。与年轻人相比,老年人的反应更慢、更不准确,也更难分辨他们最后一次看到特定刺激的时间,但 PI 对前者反应时间的影响更大,这可能是由于老年人在这项任务中普遍存在困难。对脑电图数据进行的时空主成分分析表明,年轻人和老年人在与解决PI相关的大脑活动的时空特征方面存在差异。YA 显示了内侧额叶负性(MFN)因子,该因子在低 PI 试验中的振幅大于高 PI 试验中的振幅。与此相反,OA 显示了晚期正向成分(LPC),尽管与高 PI 试验相比,在低 PI 试验中的振幅更大。YA 中 MFN 成分的调节可能反映了为克服 PI 而进行的认知控制。OA 中 LPC 的调节可能代表了在 PI 过程中对熟悉感和情境回忆之间冲突的检测。
Age differences in the principal temporo-spatial components of EEG activity during a proactive interference task
Proactive interference (PI) is the disruptive effect of no longer relevant information on current working memory (WM) processing. PI effects in EEG data have been previously found to be altered in healthy aging, although it remains unclear the extent to which such changes reflect delayed or different brain mechanisms employed to overcome PI. Hence, we had twenty-six young (18–34 years) and sixteen old (53–68 years) healthy adults complete a Recent Probes task while EEG was recorded. Compared to young adults, old adults were slower, less accurate and less able to discriminate when they last saw a given stimulus, but PI effects on reaction time were greater in the former, likely due to a general difficulty that old adults had in the task. Temporo-spatial principal component analysis of the EEG data showed young and older adults to differ in terms of temporal and spatial characteristics of brain activity associated with resolving PI. YA showed a factor indicative of a medial frontal negativity (MFN) that showed greater amplitude in low compared to high PI trials. OA, in contrast, showed a late positive component (LPC), although similarly with larger amplitude in low compared to high PI trials. The modulation of the MFN component in YA may reflect the recruitment of cognitive control to overcome PI. The modulation of the LPC in OA may represent the detection of conflict between familiarity and context recollection during PI.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane.
The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.