Georgios Maragkakis, E. Katsogiannou, G. Papakonstantinou, L. Korou, S. Chaintoutis, P. Konstantopoulos, Despoina N. Perrea, G. Christodoulopoulos, L. Athanasiou, V. Papatsiros
{"title":"探索血清 Copeptin 和血液学特征:仔猪皮内注射与肌肉注射猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒疫苗后的比较分析","authors":"Georgios Maragkakis, E. Katsogiannou, G. Papakonstantinou, L. Korou, S. Chaintoutis, P. Konstantopoulos, Despoina N. Perrea, G. Christodoulopoulos, L. Athanasiou, V. Papatsiros","doi":"10.3390/stresses4020023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the impact of intradermal (ID) and intramuscular (IM) vaccination with a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-modified live vaccine (MLV) in piglets on serum copeptin levels and hematological profile. This study included 104 suckling piglets (2 weeks of age) from a commercial farrow-to-finish pig farm suffering from positive unstable PRRSV status. Animals were assigned to four groups, with two replicates (13 piglets/group/replicate); group A: IM vaccination with a PRRSV MLV vaccine, group B: ID vaccination with the same vaccine, group C: ID of Diluvac Forte, and group D: IM of Diluvac Forte. Blood samples were collected from the same three pigs/group/replicate at 4, 7, and 10 weeks of age. Blood samples were used for the performance of the complete blood count, and they were also examined by PCR for PRRSV and by ELISA for copeptin. No significant differences in serum copeptin levels and the number of blood cell counts (packed cell volume—PCV, numbers of white blood cells—WBCs, and platelets number—PLTs) were noticed in the same group over time and among groups. In conclusion, it seems that the vaccination against PRRSV does not affect the levels of the released copeptin. Based on our results, the measurement of serum copeptin could not be proposed as a potential stress biomarker in pigs.","PeriodicalId":508968,"journal":{"name":"Stresses","volume":"53 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Serum Copeptin and Hematological Profile: A Comparative Analysis after Intradermal versus Intramuscular Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Vaccination in Piglets\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Maragkakis, E. Katsogiannou, G. Papakonstantinou, L. Korou, S. Chaintoutis, P. Konstantopoulos, Despoina N. Perrea, G. Christodoulopoulos, L. Athanasiou, V. Papatsiros\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/stresses4020023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to investigate the impact of intradermal (ID) and intramuscular (IM) vaccination with a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-modified live vaccine (MLV) in piglets on serum copeptin levels and hematological profile. This study included 104 suckling piglets (2 weeks of age) from a commercial farrow-to-finish pig farm suffering from positive unstable PRRSV status. Animals were assigned to four groups, with two replicates (13 piglets/group/replicate); group A: IM vaccination with a PRRSV MLV vaccine, group B: ID vaccination with the same vaccine, group C: ID of Diluvac Forte, and group D: IM of Diluvac Forte. Blood samples were collected from the same three pigs/group/replicate at 4, 7, and 10 weeks of age. Blood samples were used for the performance of the complete blood count, and they were also examined by PCR for PRRSV and by ELISA for copeptin. No significant differences in serum copeptin levels and the number of blood cell counts (packed cell volume—PCV, numbers of white blood cells—WBCs, and platelets number—PLTs) were noticed in the same group over time and among groups. In conclusion, it seems that the vaccination against PRRSV does not affect the levels of the released copeptin. Based on our results, the measurement of serum copeptin could not be proposed as a potential stress biomarker in pigs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stresses\",\"volume\":\"53 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stresses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4020023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stresses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4020023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在探讨仔猪皮内(ID)和肌内(IM)接种猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)改良活疫苗(MLV)对血清 copeptin 水平和血液学特征的影响。本研究纳入了 104 头哺乳仔猪(2 周龄),这些仔猪来自于一家 PRRSV 阳性不稳定的商业化猪场。动物被分为四组,每组两个重复(每组/重复 13 头仔猪);A 组:接种 PRRSV MLV 疫苗的 IM 疫苗,B 组:接种相同疫苗的 ID 疫苗,C 组:接种 Diluvac Forte 的 ID 疫苗,D 组:接种 Diluvac Forte 的 IM 疫苗:D组:Diluvac Forte IM。在 4 周龄、7 周龄和 10 周龄时,从相同的三头猪/组/重复中采集血样。血样用于进行全血细胞计数,并通过 PCR 检测 PRRSV 和 ELISA 检测桡肽素。在同一组别中,不同时间段和不同组别之间的血清 copeptin 水平和血细胞数(包装细胞体积-PCV、白细胞数-WBC 和血小板数-PLTs)均无明显差异。总之,接种 PRRSV 疫苗似乎不会影响释放的 copeptin 水平。根据我们的研究结果,血清 copeptin 的测量不能作为猪的潜在应激生物标志物。
Exploring Serum Copeptin and Hematological Profile: A Comparative Analysis after Intradermal versus Intramuscular Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Vaccination in Piglets
This study aimed to investigate the impact of intradermal (ID) and intramuscular (IM) vaccination with a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-modified live vaccine (MLV) in piglets on serum copeptin levels and hematological profile. This study included 104 suckling piglets (2 weeks of age) from a commercial farrow-to-finish pig farm suffering from positive unstable PRRSV status. Animals were assigned to four groups, with two replicates (13 piglets/group/replicate); group A: IM vaccination with a PRRSV MLV vaccine, group B: ID vaccination with the same vaccine, group C: ID of Diluvac Forte, and group D: IM of Diluvac Forte. Blood samples were collected from the same three pigs/group/replicate at 4, 7, and 10 weeks of age. Blood samples were used for the performance of the complete blood count, and they were also examined by PCR for PRRSV and by ELISA for copeptin. No significant differences in serum copeptin levels and the number of blood cell counts (packed cell volume—PCV, numbers of white blood cells—WBCs, and platelets number—PLTs) were noticed in the same group over time and among groups. In conclusion, it seems that the vaccination against PRRSV does not affect the levels of the released copeptin. Based on our results, the measurement of serum copeptin could not be proposed as a potential stress biomarker in pigs.