经椎间孔阻滞的坦塞隆和地塞米松比较研究

Yugal Chandrakar, Ninjarao Evane, Akhilesh Yona
{"title":"经椎间孔阻滞的坦塞隆和地塞米松比较研究","authors":"Yugal Chandrakar, Ninjarao Evane, Akhilesh Yona","doi":"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.51395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of Tanselone and Dexamethasone in TFESIs and provide guidance for their use, particularly for new pain specialists and postgraduate students.\nMethods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 100 patients with spinal pain syndromes randomized to receive either Tanselone or Dexamethasone in TFESIs. Pain intensity scores and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline and follow-up intervals (11). Adverse events related to TFESIs were monitored. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.\nResults: Tanselone demonstrated superior efficacy in pain relief and functional improvement compared to Dexamethasone, with patients in the Tanselone group experiencing greater reductions in pain intensity scores and improvements in functional outcomes at all follow-up intervals. However, concerns were raised regarding the potential risk of vascular complications associated with Tanselone’s particulate nature. For new pain specialists and postgraduate students, Dexamethasone may be considered a safer alternative to minimize the risk of complications associated with TFESIs (11). A difference which was significant statistically in the Pain intensity score questionnaire (3.73±1.15 in group T, 6.55±0.51 in group Dx) and Oswestry disability index (18.67±7.13 in group T, 35.83±5.10 in group Dx) was found in both but was more in Tanselone group.\nConclusion: By comparing Tanselone and dexamethasone for epidural injection, for the duration of analgesia of pain in lumbar radiculopathy, injection of Tanselone has been found to be more effective than injection of dexamethasone through transforaminal route. Clinicians should weigh the potential benefits of Tanselone’s efficacy against its perceived risks and consider using Dexamethasone, especially for novice practitioners, to minimize the risk of complications and ensure procedural safety in patients with spinal pain syndromes.","PeriodicalId":8528,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A STUDY ON TRANSFORAMINAL BLOCK COMPARISON OF TANSELONE AND DEXAMETHASONE\",\"authors\":\"Yugal Chandrakar, Ninjarao Evane, Akhilesh Yona\",\"doi\":\"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.51395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of Tanselone and Dexamethasone in TFESIs and provide guidance for their use, particularly for new pain specialists and postgraduate students.\\nMethods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 100 patients with spinal pain syndromes randomized to receive either Tanselone or Dexamethasone in TFESIs. Pain intensity scores and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline and follow-up intervals (11). Adverse events related to TFESIs were monitored. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.\\nResults: Tanselone demonstrated superior efficacy in pain relief and functional improvement compared to Dexamethasone, with patients in the Tanselone group experiencing greater reductions in pain intensity scores and improvements in functional outcomes at all follow-up intervals. However, concerns were raised regarding the potential risk of vascular complications associated with Tanselone’s particulate nature. For new pain specialists and postgraduate students, Dexamethasone may be considered a safer alternative to minimize the risk of complications associated with TFESIs (11). A difference which was significant statistically in the Pain intensity score questionnaire (3.73±1.15 in group T, 6.55±0.51 in group Dx) and Oswestry disability index (18.67±7.13 in group T, 35.83±5.10 in group Dx) was found in both but was more in Tanselone group.\\nConclusion: By comparing Tanselone and dexamethasone for epidural injection, for the duration of analgesia of pain in lumbar radiculopathy, injection of Tanselone has been found to be more effective than injection of dexamethasone through transforaminal route. Clinicians should weigh the potential benefits of Tanselone’s efficacy against its perceived risks and consider using Dexamethasone, especially for novice practitioners, to minimize the risk of complications and ensure procedural safety in patients with spinal pain syndromes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.51395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.51395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较坦塞隆和地塞米松在TFESI中的疗效和安全性,并为其使用提供指导,尤其是为新的疼痛专科医生和研究生提供指导:方法:进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,100 名脊柱疼痛综合征患者随机接受坦塞隆或地塞米松 TFESIs。在基线和随访期间对疼痛强度评分和功能结果进行了评估(11)。对与 TFESIs 相关的不良事件进行了监测。对两组结果进行了统计分析比较:与地塞米松相比,坦塞隆在缓解疼痛和改善功能方面的疗效更佳,坦塞隆组患者的疼痛强度评分降低幅度更大,在所有随访间隔期的功能改善幅度也更大。不过,也有人担心坦塞隆的微粒性质可能会引起血管并发症。对于新的疼痛专家和研究生来说,地塞米松可能被认为是一种更安全的替代品,可将与 TFESIs 相关的并发症风险降至最低(11)。在疼痛强度评分问卷(T 组为 3.73±1.15,Dx 组为 6.55±0.51)和 Oswestry 残疾指数(T 组为 18.67±7.13,Dx 组为 35.83±5.10)中,两者均发现了显著的统计学差异,但坦塞隆组的差异更大:结论:通过比较硬膜外注射坦塞隆和地塞米松对腰椎间盘突出症疼痛的镇痛持续时间,发现注射坦塞隆比经椎管途径注射地塞米松更有效。临床医生应权衡坦塞隆疗效的潜在益处和风险,考虑使用地塞米松,尤其是对于新手医生,以尽量减少并发症的风险,确保脊柱疼痛综合征患者的手术安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A STUDY ON TRANSFORAMINAL BLOCK COMPARISON OF TANSELONE AND DEXAMETHASONE
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of Tanselone and Dexamethasone in TFESIs and provide guidance for their use, particularly for new pain specialists and postgraduate students. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 100 patients with spinal pain syndromes randomized to receive either Tanselone or Dexamethasone in TFESIs. Pain intensity scores and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline and follow-up intervals (11). Adverse events related to TFESIs were monitored. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results: Tanselone demonstrated superior efficacy in pain relief and functional improvement compared to Dexamethasone, with patients in the Tanselone group experiencing greater reductions in pain intensity scores and improvements in functional outcomes at all follow-up intervals. However, concerns were raised regarding the potential risk of vascular complications associated with Tanselone’s particulate nature. For new pain specialists and postgraduate students, Dexamethasone may be considered a safer alternative to minimize the risk of complications associated with TFESIs (11). A difference which was significant statistically in the Pain intensity score questionnaire (3.73±1.15 in group T, 6.55±0.51 in group Dx) and Oswestry disability index (18.67±7.13 in group T, 35.83±5.10 in group Dx) was found in both but was more in Tanselone group. Conclusion: By comparing Tanselone and dexamethasone for epidural injection, for the duration of analgesia of pain in lumbar radiculopathy, injection of Tanselone has been found to be more effective than injection of dexamethasone through transforaminal route. Clinicians should weigh the potential benefits of Tanselone’s efficacy against its perceived risks and consider using Dexamethasone, especially for novice practitioners, to minimize the risk of complications and ensure procedural safety in patients with spinal pain syndromes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信