{"title":"伊拉克类风湿性关节炎患者肠内和肠外摄入甲氨蝶呤在疗效和肝功能损害方面的比较","authors":"A. M. K. AL-TUMA","doi":"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.50812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is a disease-modifying ant-rheumatic drug that has been used commonly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a goal of reducing RA activity or RA remission. Response to MTX varied among patients and side effects including liver impairment are not uncommon. The study aimed to compare oral and parenteral MTX intake regarding the efficacy and risk of liver impairment in patients with RA.\nSubject: Thirty patients who were newly diagnosed with RA according to EULAR/ASAR were included in the study. MTX was given for them for 6 months in a dose ranging between 2 and 25 mg either orally or parenterally intramuscular and subcutaneously once weekly. Patients were assessed depending on clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score and liver enzymes were measured before and after the start of the treatment.\nResults: The study showed that parenteral MTX intake significantly improves the CDAI score more than oral intake, CDAI reduced from 13.15±3.25 to 5.57±2.34 following 6 months of treatment in comparison to its’ insignificant reduction from 12.72±3.13 to 8.90±3.08 following oral treatment. Regarding liver enzymes, the impairment in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase is significantly less than that with oral ones with the same effect on alkaline phosphatase.\nConclusion: Parenteral MTX intake tends to be more efficacious in attaining low disease activity than oral intake with a lower rate of impaired liver function.","PeriodicalId":8528,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":" 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARISON BETWEEN ENTERAL AND PARENTERAL METHOTREXATE INTAKE IN IRAQI PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS REGARDING EFFICACY AND LIVER FUNCTION IMPAIRMENT\",\"authors\":\"A. M. K. AL-TUMA\",\"doi\":\"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.50812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is a disease-modifying ant-rheumatic drug that has been used commonly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a goal of reducing RA activity or RA remission. Response to MTX varied among patients and side effects including liver impairment are not uncommon. The study aimed to compare oral and parenteral MTX intake regarding the efficacy and risk of liver impairment in patients with RA.\\nSubject: Thirty patients who were newly diagnosed with RA according to EULAR/ASAR were included in the study. MTX was given for them for 6 months in a dose ranging between 2 and 25 mg either orally or parenterally intramuscular and subcutaneously once weekly. Patients were assessed depending on clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score and liver enzymes were measured before and after the start of the treatment.\\nResults: The study showed that parenteral MTX intake significantly improves the CDAI score more than oral intake, CDAI reduced from 13.15±3.25 to 5.57±2.34 following 6 months of treatment in comparison to its’ insignificant reduction from 12.72±3.13 to 8.90±3.08 following oral treatment. Regarding liver enzymes, the impairment in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase is significantly less than that with oral ones with the same effect on alkaline phosphatase.\\nConclusion: Parenteral MTX intake tends to be more efficacious in attaining low disease activity than oral intake with a lower rate of impaired liver function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\" 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.50812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.50812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:甲氨蝶呤(MTX)是一种改变病情的抗风湿药物,常用于类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者,目的是减少 RA 活动或使 RA 缓解。不同患者对MTX的反应各不相同,包括肝功能损害在内的副作用也不少见。该研究旨在比较口服和肠外MTX对RA患者的疗效和肝功能损害风险:研究纳入了 30 名根据 EULAR/ASAR 新确诊的 RA 患者。在为期6个月的时间里,他们口服或皮下注射MTX,剂量从2毫克到25毫克不等,每周一次。根据临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)评分对患者进行评估,并在治疗开始前后测量肝酶:研究显示,肠外注射 MTX 比口服 MTX 更能明显改善 CDAI 评分,治疗 6 个月后 CDAI 从(13.15±3.25)分降至(5.57±2.34)分,而口服治疗后 CDAI 从(12.72±3.13)分降至(8.90±3.08)分,降幅不明显。在肝酶方面,丙氨酸氨基转移酶和天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶的损害明显低于口服治疗,对碱性磷酸酶的影响相同:结论:与口服药物相比,肠外MTX对达到低疾病活动度更有效,且肝功能受损率更低。
A COMPARISON BETWEEN ENTERAL AND PARENTERAL METHOTREXATE INTAKE IN IRAQI PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS REGARDING EFFICACY AND LIVER FUNCTION IMPAIRMENT
Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is a disease-modifying ant-rheumatic drug that has been used commonly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a goal of reducing RA activity or RA remission. Response to MTX varied among patients and side effects including liver impairment are not uncommon. The study aimed to compare oral and parenteral MTX intake regarding the efficacy and risk of liver impairment in patients with RA.
Subject: Thirty patients who were newly diagnosed with RA according to EULAR/ASAR were included in the study. MTX was given for them for 6 months in a dose ranging between 2 and 25 mg either orally or parenterally intramuscular and subcutaneously once weekly. Patients were assessed depending on clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score and liver enzymes were measured before and after the start of the treatment.
Results: The study showed that parenteral MTX intake significantly improves the CDAI score more than oral intake, CDAI reduced from 13.15±3.25 to 5.57±2.34 following 6 months of treatment in comparison to its’ insignificant reduction from 12.72±3.13 to 8.90±3.08 following oral treatment. Regarding liver enzymes, the impairment in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase is significantly less than that with oral ones with the same effect on alkaline phosphatase.
Conclusion: Parenteral MTX intake tends to be more efficacious in attaining low disease activity than oral intake with a lower rate of impaired liver function.