{"title":"斑点边缘特性对 DIC 计算误差的影响","authors":"H. Cui, Z. Zeng, H. Zhang, F. Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11340-024-01078-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In DIC studies, positional parameters and speckle size are commonly used to characterise speckle images. The influence of edge parameters is ignored. This leads to a great difference between the DIC calculation results of simulated and real images. And some contradictory results are also produced.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main objective of this paper is to investigate the effect of edge parameters. As well as to give more reasonable parameters to describe the speckle characteristics.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Firstly, this paper proposes a series of more reasonable parameters to describe the speckle features based on the mathematical expression of the speckle image. Subsequently, the effect of different edge functions on the computational error of DIC is investigated. The effect of different edge functions on pre-filtering is also investigated. Finally, real speckle images are produced using Gaussian and step functions to study the difference between the simulated and real speckle images.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Generally, it is believed that prefiltering can reduce the computational error of DIC, but for Gaussian edges, prefiltering hardly reduces the error, whereas hybrid edges correctly exhibit this phenomenon. Although the Gaussian edge perform well in the simulation, the actual speckle images taken show that the DIC error corresponding to the camera-acquired Gaussian speckle is much larger than that of the step speckle.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The introduction of edge parameters to describe speckle images is necessary for DIC studies. Pre-filtering always reduces the DIC error, but for Gaussian edges this property cannot be demonstrated. The most suitable edges in reality are step edges, not Gaussian edges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":552,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Mechanics","volume":"64 7","pages":"1143 - 1160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Speckle Edge Characteristics on DIC Calculation Error\",\"authors\":\"H. Cui, Z. Zeng, H. Zhang, F. Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11340-024-01078-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In DIC studies, positional parameters and speckle size are commonly used to characterise speckle images. The influence of edge parameters is ignored. This leads to a great difference between the DIC calculation results of simulated and real images. And some contradictory results are also produced.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main objective of this paper is to investigate the effect of edge parameters. As well as to give more reasonable parameters to describe the speckle characteristics.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Firstly, this paper proposes a series of more reasonable parameters to describe the speckle features based on the mathematical expression of the speckle image. Subsequently, the effect of different edge functions on the computational error of DIC is investigated. The effect of different edge functions on pre-filtering is also investigated. Finally, real speckle images are produced using Gaussian and step functions to study the difference between the simulated and real speckle images.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Generally, it is believed that prefiltering can reduce the computational error of DIC, but for Gaussian edges, prefiltering hardly reduces the error, whereas hybrid edges correctly exhibit this phenomenon. Although the Gaussian edge perform well in the simulation, the actual speckle images taken show that the DIC error corresponding to the camera-acquired Gaussian speckle is much larger than that of the step speckle.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The introduction of edge parameters to describe speckle images is necessary for DIC studies. Pre-filtering always reduces the DIC error, but for Gaussian edges this property cannot be demonstrated. The most suitable edges in reality are step edges, not Gaussian edges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"64 7\",\"pages\":\"1143 - 1160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-024-01078-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-024-01078-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Speckle Edge Characteristics on DIC Calculation Error
Background
In DIC studies, positional parameters and speckle size are commonly used to characterise speckle images. The influence of edge parameters is ignored. This leads to a great difference between the DIC calculation results of simulated and real images. And some contradictory results are also produced.
Objective
The main objective of this paper is to investigate the effect of edge parameters. As well as to give more reasonable parameters to describe the speckle characteristics.
Methods
Firstly, this paper proposes a series of more reasonable parameters to describe the speckle features based on the mathematical expression of the speckle image. Subsequently, the effect of different edge functions on the computational error of DIC is investigated. The effect of different edge functions on pre-filtering is also investigated. Finally, real speckle images are produced using Gaussian and step functions to study the difference between the simulated and real speckle images.
Results
Generally, it is believed that prefiltering can reduce the computational error of DIC, but for Gaussian edges, prefiltering hardly reduces the error, whereas hybrid edges correctly exhibit this phenomenon. Although the Gaussian edge perform well in the simulation, the actual speckle images taken show that the DIC error corresponding to the camera-acquired Gaussian speckle is much larger than that of the step speckle.
Conclusions
The introduction of edge parameters to describe speckle images is necessary for DIC studies. Pre-filtering always reduces the DIC error, but for Gaussian edges this property cannot be demonstrated. The most suitable edges in reality are step edges, not Gaussian edges.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Mechanics is the official journal of the Society for Experimental Mechanics that publishes papers in all areas of experimentation including its theoretical and computational analysis. The journal covers research in design and implementation of novel or improved experiments to characterize materials, structures and systems. Articles extending the frontiers of experimental mechanics at large and small scales are particularly welcome.
Coverage extends from research in solid and fluids mechanics to fields at the intersection of disciplines including physics, chemistry and biology. Development of new devices and technologies for metrology applications in a wide range of industrial sectors (e.g., manufacturing, high-performance materials, aerospace, information technology, medicine, energy and environmental technologies) is also covered.