在全球迪克西倾倒垃圾:毒圈与全球南部的污染

IF 0.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Amy M. Hay
{"title":"在全球迪克西倾倒垃圾:毒圈与全球南部的污染","authors":"Amy M. Hay","doi":"10.3828/whpge.63837646622491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The 1981 publication of David Weir and Mark Shapiro’s exposé\n Circle of Poison\n almost ten years after the banning of DDT represented how the landscape of understandings about hazardous chemicals and their regulation had changed. The book exposed two things. One was the ways power had reconfigured itself, which in turn highlighted the ways the story\n Silent Spring\n told, which effectively moved hearts and minds to make change happen. One thing that remained hidden, however, to both Rachel Carson and Weir and Shapiro, was the degree to which the chemical industry traded at the local and regional level, conducting international trade, emulating the poor and often bad faith practices of the transnational corporations. The failure of\n Circle\n ’s narrative, coupled with an overlooked and extensive network of mom-and-pop chemical companies, failed to build on\n Silent Spring\n ’s legacy.\n \n \n This article was published open access under a CC BY licence:\n https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0\n .\n","PeriodicalId":42763,"journal":{"name":"Global Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dumping in the Global Dixie: Circle of Poison and the Contamination of the Global South\",\"authors\":\"Amy M. Hay\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/whpge.63837646622491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The 1981 publication of David Weir and Mark Shapiro’s exposé\\n Circle of Poison\\n almost ten years after the banning of DDT represented how the landscape of understandings about hazardous chemicals and their regulation had changed. The book exposed two things. One was the ways power had reconfigured itself, which in turn highlighted the ways the story\\n Silent Spring\\n told, which effectively moved hearts and minds to make change happen. One thing that remained hidden, however, to both Rachel Carson and Weir and Shapiro, was the degree to which the chemical industry traded at the local and regional level, conducting international trade, emulating the poor and often bad faith practices of the transnational corporations. The failure of\\n Circle\\n ’s narrative, coupled with an overlooked and extensive network of mom-and-pop chemical companies, failed to build on\\n Silent Spring\\n ’s legacy.\\n \\n \\n This article was published open access under a CC BY licence:\\n https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0\\n .\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/whpge.63837646622491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/whpge.63837646622491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1981 年,戴维-威尔和马克-夏皮罗的揭露性著作《毒圈》在滴滴涕被禁用近十年后出版,这表明人们对危险化学品及其监管的认识发生了变化。这本书揭露了两件事。一是权力重组的方式,这反过来又凸显了《寂静的春天》所讲述的故事,它有效地打动了人心,使变革得以实现。然而,对于蕾切尔-卡森、韦尔和夏皮罗来说,有一件事仍被掩盖,那就是化学工业在地方和区域层面进行国际贸易的程度,以及仿效跨国公司的拙劣且往往是恶意的做法。圆环》叙述的失败,再加上被忽视的、广泛的母婴化工企业网络,使得《寂静的春天》未能发扬光大。 本文以 CC BY 许可方式公开发表:https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dumping in the Global Dixie: Circle of Poison and the Contamination of the Global South
The 1981 publication of David Weir and Mark Shapiro’s exposé Circle of Poison almost ten years after the banning of DDT represented how the landscape of understandings about hazardous chemicals and their regulation had changed. The book exposed two things. One was the ways power had reconfigured itself, which in turn highlighted the ways the story Silent Spring told, which effectively moved hearts and minds to make change happen. One thing that remained hidden, however, to both Rachel Carson and Weir and Shapiro, was the degree to which the chemical industry traded at the local and regional level, conducting international trade, emulating the poor and often bad faith practices of the transnational corporations. The failure of Circle ’s narrative, coupled with an overlooked and extensive network of mom-and-pop chemical companies, failed to build on Silent Spring ’s legacy. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Environment
Global Environment ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The half-yearly journal Global Environment: A Journal of History and Natural and Social Sciences acts as a forum and echo chamber for ongoing studies on the environment and world history, with special focus on modern and contemporary topics. Our intent is to gather and stimulate scholarship that, despite a diversity of approaches and themes, shares an environmental perspective on world history in its various facets, including economic development, social relations, production government, and international relations. One of the journal’s main commitments is to bring together different areas of expertise in both the natural and the social sciences to facilitate a common language and a common perspective in the study of history. This commitment is fulfilled by way of peer-reviewed research articles and also by interviews and other special features. Global Environment strives to transcend the western-centric and ‘developist’ bias that has dominated international environmental historiography so far and to favour the emergence of spatially and culturally diversified points of view. It seeks to replace the notion of ‘hierarchy’ with those of ‘relationship’ and ‘exchange’ – between continents, states, regions, cities, central zones and peripheral areas – in studying the construction or destruction of environments and ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信