分析班佑万吉PGRI大学英语教育系学生写作中的句法错误

LUNAR Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.36526/ln.v8i1.3708
Karina Alfi, Nuril Layli, Arin Inayah, Wiwin Indiarti
{"title":"分析班佑万吉PGRI大学英语教育系学生写作中的句法错误","authors":"Karina Alfi, Nuril Layli, Arin Inayah, Wiwin Indiarti","doi":"10.36526/ln.v8i1.3708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research described about an analysis of Syntactical Errors in writing cause and effect paragraphs made by the 2nd semester students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi. The purpose of this research was to analyze the types and the dominant forms of Syntactical Errors in students’ cause and effect paragraphs. The researcher used a descriptive qualitative method in analyzing the data. The sources of data in this research were cause and effect paragraphs made by 2nd semester students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi. The researcher used Politzer and Romirez’s theory as a base for analyze the Syntactical Errors of the data. From the analysis, the researcher discovered that there were 45 different types of Syntactical Errors based on the data analysis and discussion. Students made errors in 33 types of noun phrases and 12 types of verb phrases. The errors can be percentage to 73% of noun phrases and 27% of verb phrases. From the percentages, the errors are dominated by noun phrases by 73% of the total Syntactical Errors found in writing cause and effect paragraphs made by the 2nd Semester Students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi.  ","PeriodicalId":513488,"journal":{"name":"LUNAR","volume":" 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTICAL ERRORS IN WRITING MADE BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATIONAL DEPARTMENT AT PGRI UNIVERSITY OF BANYUWANGI\",\"authors\":\"Karina Alfi, Nuril Layli, Arin Inayah, Wiwin Indiarti\",\"doi\":\"10.36526/ln.v8i1.3708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research described about an analysis of Syntactical Errors in writing cause and effect paragraphs made by the 2nd semester students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi. The purpose of this research was to analyze the types and the dominant forms of Syntactical Errors in students’ cause and effect paragraphs. The researcher used a descriptive qualitative method in analyzing the data. The sources of data in this research were cause and effect paragraphs made by 2nd semester students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi. The researcher used Politzer and Romirez’s theory as a base for analyze the Syntactical Errors of the data. From the analysis, the researcher discovered that there were 45 different types of Syntactical Errors based on the data analysis and discussion. Students made errors in 33 types of noun phrases and 12 types of verb phrases. The errors can be percentage to 73% of noun phrases and 27% of verb phrases. From the percentages, the errors are dominated by noun phrases by 73% of the total Syntactical Errors found in writing cause and effect paragraphs made by the 2nd Semester Students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":513488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LUNAR\",\"volume\":\" 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LUNAR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36526/ln.v8i1.3708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LUNAR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36526/ln.v8i1.3708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了班裕万吉公立大学英语教育系第二学期学生在因果段落写作中出现的句法错误。本研究的目的是分析学生因果段落中的句法错误类型和主要形式。研究人员采用描述性定性方法分析数据。本研究的数据来源于巴育万宜PGRI大学英语教育系第二学期学生所写的因果段落。研究人员以 Politzer 和 Romirez 的理论为基础,分析了数据中的句法错误。通过分析和讨论,研究人员发现共有 45 种不同类型的句法错误。学生在 33 种名词短语和 12 种动词短语中出现了错误。这些错误在名词短语中占 73%,在动词短语中占 27%。从百分比来看,班裕万宜PGRI大学英语教育系第二学期学生在因果段落写作中出现的语法错误中,名词短语错误占73%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AN ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTICAL ERRORS IN WRITING MADE BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATIONAL DEPARTMENT AT PGRI UNIVERSITY OF BANYUWANGI
This research described about an analysis of Syntactical Errors in writing cause and effect paragraphs made by the 2nd semester students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi. The purpose of this research was to analyze the types and the dominant forms of Syntactical Errors in students’ cause and effect paragraphs. The researcher used a descriptive qualitative method in analyzing the data. The sources of data in this research were cause and effect paragraphs made by 2nd semester students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi. The researcher used Politzer and Romirez’s theory as a base for analyze the Syntactical Errors of the data. From the analysis, the researcher discovered that there were 45 different types of Syntactical Errors based on the data analysis and discussion. Students made errors in 33 types of noun phrases and 12 types of verb phrases. The errors can be percentage to 73% of noun phrases and 27% of verb phrases. From the percentages, the errors are dominated by noun phrases by 73% of the total Syntactical Errors found in writing cause and effect paragraphs made by the 2nd Semester Students of English Educational Department at PGRI University of Banyuwangi.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信