基于 FMEA 和模糊推理系统的电磁铁性能退化可靠性分析方法

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jihong Pang, Jinkun Dai, Xinze Lian, Zhigang Ding
{"title":"基于 FMEA 和模糊推理系统的电磁铁性能退化可靠性分析方法","authors":"Jihong Pang, Jinkun Dai, Xinze Lian, Zhigang Ding","doi":"10.1002/qre.3602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electromagnets are often used in indirect control for industrial applications. The ability of an electromagnet to control objects should decrease with performance degradation. And electromagnets product poses a danger to people and objects in the working environment. So, it is very difficult to analyze the reliability of electromagnetic performance degradation because of the complicated working condition. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is the most commonly used tool for product reliability analysis. The new version of FMEA uses integer as evaluation value, which cannot represent the hesitation psychology of the evaluator. The Action Priority (AP) table of the FMEA describes the relationship between the evaluation of influencing factors and the risk level of the failure mode, which provides rules for determining the risk level of the failure mode. However, the AP table may result in multiple failure modes having the same ranking, which does not align with the intention of FMEA to prevent failures. Therefore, this paper proposes a reliability analysis method for electromagnetic performance degradation based on FMEA and FIS. Firstly, the Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set (DHHFLTS) is used as the evaluation language to describe the hesitation psychology of evaluators. Secondly, the AP table of FMEA is used as FIS fuzzy inference rule. In this way, the idea of FMEA to determine the risk level of failure mode is retained and the problem of FIS fuzzy rule making is overcome. Then, FIS defuzzification AP table inference results to determine the risk ranking of failure modes. This avoids situations where the order of failure modes is equal. Finally, a performance degradation model of the electromagnet is constructed based on the Wiener process, and the calculation results of the new method are verified.","PeriodicalId":56088,"journal":{"name":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reliability analysis method for electromagnet performance degradation based on FMEA and fuzzy inference system\",\"authors\":\"Jihong Pang, Jinkun Dai, Xinze Lian, Zhigang Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qre.3602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electromagnets are often used in indirect control for industrial applications. The ability of an electromagnet to control objects should decrease with performance degradation. And electromagnets product poses a danger to people and objects in the working environment. So, it is very difficult to analyze the reliability of electromagnetic performance degradation because of the complicated working condition. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is the most commonly used tool for product reliability analysis. The new version of FMEA uses integer as evaluation value, which cannot represent the hesitation psychology of the evaluator. The Action Priority (AP) table of the FMEA describes the relationship between the evaluation of influencing factors and the risk level of the failure mode, which provides rules for determining the risk level of the failure mode. However, the AP table may result in multiple failure modes having the same ranking, which does not align with the intention of FMEA to prevent failures. Therefore, this paper proposes a reliability analysis method for electromagnetic performance degradation based on FMEA and FIS. Firstly, the Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set (DHHFLTS) is used as the evaluation language to describe the hesitation psychology of evaluators. Secondly, the AP table of FMEA is used as FIS fuzzy inference rule. In this way, the idea of FMEA to determine the risk level of failure mode is retained and the problem of FIS fuzzy rule making is overcome. Then, FIS defuzzification AP table inference results to determine the risk ranking of failure modes. This avoids situations where the order of failure modes is equal. Finally, a performance degradation model of the electromagnet is constructed based on the Wiener process, and the calculation results of the new method are verified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality and Reliability Engineering International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality and Reliability Engineering International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电磁铁通常用于工业应用中的间接控制。电磁铁控制物体的能力会随着性能的下降而降低。而电磁铁产品会对工作环境中的人和物造成危害。因此,由于工作条件复杂,分析电磁性能退化的可靠性非常困难。失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)是产品可靠性分析最常用的工具。新版 FMEA 采用整数作为评估值,不能代表评估者的犹豫心理。FMEA 的行动优先级(AP)表描述了影响因素评价与失效模式风险等级之间的关系,为失效模式风险等级的确定提供了规则。然而,AP 表可能会导致多种失效模式具有相同的等级,这与 FMEA 预防失效的初衷不符。因此,本文提出了一种基于 FMEA 和 FIS 的电磁性能退化可靠性分析方法。首先,采用双层次犹豫模糊语言术语集(DHHFLTS)作为评价语言,描述评价者的犹豫心理。其次,将 FMEA 的 AP 表用作 FIS 的模糊推理规则。这样,既保留了 FMEA 确定失效模式风险等级的思想,又克服了 FIS 模糊规则制定的问题。然后,通过 FIS 模糊化 AP 表推理结果来确定故障模式的风险等级。这避免了故障模式顺序相等的情况。最后,基于维纳过程构建了电磁铁性能退化模型,并验证了新方法的计算结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A reliability analysis method for electromagnet performance degradation based on FMEA and fuzzy inference system
Electromagnets are often used in indirect control for industrial applications. The ability of an electromagnet to control objects should decrease with performance degradation. And electromagnets product poses a danger to people and objects in the working environment. So, it is very difficult to analyze the reliability of electromagnetic performance degradation because of the complicated working condition. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is the most commonly used tool for product reliability analysis. The new version of FMEA uses integer as evaluation value, which cannot represent the hesitation psychology of the evaluator. The Action Priority (AP) table of the FMEA describes the relationship between the evaluation of influencing factors and the risk level of the failure mode, which provides rules for determining the risk level of the failure mode. However, the AP table may result in multiple failure modes having the same ranking, which does not align with the intention of FMEA to prevent failures. Therefore, this paper proposes a reliability analysis method for electromagnetic performance degradation based on FMEA and FIS. Firstly, the Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set (DHHFLTS) is used as the evaluation language to describe the hesitation psychology of evaluators. Secondly, the AP table of FMEA is used as FIS fuzzy inference rule. In this way, the idea of FMEA to determine the risk level of failure mode is retained and the problem of FIS fuzzy rule making is overcome. Then, FIS defuzzification AP table inference results to determine the risk ranking of failure modes. This avoids situations where the order of failure modes is equal. Finally, a performance degradation model of the electromagnet is constructed based on the Wiener process, and the calculation results of the new method are verified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
21.70%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Quality and Reliability Engineering International is a journal devoted to practical engineering aspects of quality and reliability. A refereed technical journal published eight times per year, it covers the development and practical application of existing theoretical methods, research and industrial practices. Articles in the journal will be concerned with case studies, tutorial-type reviews and also with applications of new or well-known theory to the solution of actual quality and reliability problems in engineering. Papers describing the use of mathematical and statistical tools to solve real life industrial problems are encouraged, provided that the emphasis is placed on practical applications and demonstrated case studies. The scope of the journal is intended to include components, physics of failure, equipment and systems from the fields of electronic, electrical, mechanical and systems engineering. The areas of communications, aerospace, automotive, railways, shipboard equipment, control engineering and consumer products are all covered by the journal. Quality and reliability of hardware as well as software are covered. Papers on software engineering and its impact on product quality and reliability are encouraged. The journal will also cover the management of quality and reliability in the engineering industry. Special issues on a variety of key topics are published every year and contribute to the enhancement of Quality and Reliability Engineering International as a major reference in its field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信