自闭症背景下的精神痛苦和精神伤害

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Zainab Al-Attar, Rachel Worthington
{"title":"自闭症背景下的精神痛苦和精神伤害","authors":"Zainab Al-Attar, Rachel Worthington","doi":"10.1108/aia-05-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nClinically, it is often observed that autistic people may have a heightened need for rules and may find rule violations very distressing. It is clinically plausible that autistic individuals may be prone to hyper-morality and greater reactivity and adverse experiences arising from moral threats and violations. Such adverse experiences may, in some instances, lead to moral distress (MD) or in more extreme cases moral injury. Thus, this study aims to examine how MD can operate in the context of autism.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors explore clinical hypotheses on how MD can intersect with different features of autism by drawing on clinical and research knowledge of autism spectrum disorder and how it contextualises experiences of morality.\n\n\nFindings\nBased on a review of the literature and theory, the authors hypothesise that autistic individuals may be more prone to MD where they have a lower threshold for MD. As a result of this lower threshold, they may have more frequent exposure to MD, experience more immediate and intense subjective reactions to moral transgressions, for more protracted periods. Also, they may find it more difficult to over-ride and neutralise moral outrage. As a result, they may be more susceptible to mental health sequelae and impaired social and occupational functioning. Practical recommendations are made for clinicians supporting people with autism with a propensity for MD or moral injury, to improve their quality of life.\n\n\nPractical implications\nPractical recommendations are made for clinicians supporting people with autism with a propensity for MD or moral injury, to improve their quality of life.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nUnderstanding MD in an autistic context is important for detecting and treating the adverse impacts of MD on autistic individuals. Importantly, erroneous preconceptions about moral reasoning in autism need to be mitigated to fully understand the moral experiences and harness the many strengths of people with autism.\n","PeriodicalId":43640,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Autism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral distress and moral injury in the context of autism\",\"authors\":\"Zainab Al-Attar, Rachel Worthington\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/aia-05-2023-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nClinically, it is often observed that autistic people may have a heightened need for rules and may find rule violations very distressing. It is clinically plausible that autistic individuals may be prone to hyper-morality and greater reactivity and adverse experiences arising from moral threats and violations. Such adverse experiences may, in some instances, lead to moral distress (MD) or in more extreme cases moral injury. Thus, this study aims to examine how MD can operate in the context of autism.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors explore clinical hypotheses on how MD can intersect with different features of autism by drawing on clinical and research knowledge of autism spectrum disorder and how it contextualises experiences of morality.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nBased on a review of the literature and theory, the authors hypothesise that autistic individuals may be more prone to MD where they have a lower threshold for MD. As a result of this lower threshold, they may have more frequent exposure to MD, experience more immediate and intense subjective reactions to moral transgressions, for more protracted periods. Also, they may find it more difficult to over-ride and neutralise moral outrage. As a result, they may be more susceptible to mental health sequelae and impaired social and occupational functioning. Practical recommendations are made for clinicians supporting people with autism with a propensity for MD or moral injury, to improve their quality of life.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nPractical recommendations are made for clinicians supporting people with autism with a propensity for MD or moral injury, to improve their quality of life.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nUnderstanding MD in an autistic context is important for detecting and treating the adverse impacts of MD on autistic individuals. Importantly, erroneous preconceptions about moral reasoning in autism need to be mitigated to fully understand the moral experiences and harness the many strengths of people with autism.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Autism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Autism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/aia-05-2023-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Autism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aia-05-2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的临床上经常观察到,自闭症患者对规则的需求可能会增加,并可能会发现违反规则的行为非常令人痛苦。在临床上,自闭症患者可能容易过度道德化,并对道德威胁和违反道德的行为产生更大的反应和不良体验。在某些情况下,这种不良体验可能会导致道德困扰(MD),或者在更极端的情况下导致道德伤害。因此,本研究旨在探讨自闭症背景下的道德困扰是如何产生的。研究结果基于对文献和理论的回顾,作者假设自闭症患者可能更容易产生道德困扰,因为他们的道德困扰阈值较低。由于阈值较低,他们可能更频繁地接触到道德问题,对道德过失的主观反应更直接、更强烈,持续时间更长。此外,他们可能会发现更难消除和中和道德义愤。因此,他们可能更容易出现精神健康后遗症,社会和职业功能也更容易受损。为临床医生提供实用建议,帮助有自闭症或道德伤害倾向的自闭症患者改善生活质量。原创性/价值在自闭症背景下了解自闭症,对于发现和治疗自闭症对自闭症患者的不良影响非常重要。重要的是,需要减少对自闭症患者道德推理的错误成见,以充分了解自闭症患者的道德体验并利用他们的诸多优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral distress and moral injury in the context of autism
Purpose Clinically, it is often observed that autistic people may have a heightened need for rules and may find rule violations very distressing. It is clinically plausible that autistic individuals may be prone to hyper-morality and greater reactivity and adverse experiences arising from moral threats and violations. Such adverse experiences may, in some instances, lead to moral distress (MD) or in more extreme cases moral injury. Thus, this study aims to examine how MD can operate in the context of autism. Design/methodology/approach The authors explore clinical hypotheses on how MD can intersect with different features of autism by drawing on clinical and research knowledge of autism spectrum disorder and how it contextualises experiences of morality. Findings Based on a review of the literature and theory, the authors hypothesise that autistic individuals may be more prone to MD where they have a lower threshold for MD. As a result of this lower threshold, they may have more frequent exposure to MD, experience more immediate and intense subjective reactions to moral transgressions, for more protracted periods. Also, they may find it more difficult to over-ride and neutralise moral outrage. As a result, they may be more susceptible to mental health sequelae and impaired social and occupational functioning. Practical recommendations are made for clinicians supporting people with autism with a propensity for MD or moral injury, to improve their quality of life. Practical implications Practical recommendations are made for clinicians supporting people with autism with a propensity for MD or moral injury, to improve their quality of life. Originality/value Understanding MD in an autistic context is important for detecting and treating the adverse impacts of MD on autistic individuals. Importantly, erroneous preconceptions about moral reasoning in autism need to be mitigated to fully understand the moral experiences and harness the many strengths of people with autism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Autism
Advances in Autism PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Advances in Autism is unique in its focus on the health and care aspects and outcomes for people with autism. The journal''s content is international in focus and peer-reviewed. It includes the following: research-based articles evidence-based clinical and support articles articles on policy and advances in services where these can be internationally applied. Key areas of research covered include: clinical developments people''s experience through qualitative research policy debates and outcomes inclusion and quality of life developmental issues population and epidemiological studies services developments evidence-based reviews of key practice issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信