英国地震的地动模型

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
John Douglas, Guillermo Aldama-Bustos, Sarah Tallett-Williams, Manuela Daví, Iain J. Tromans
{"title":"英国地震的地动模型","authors":"John Douglas,&nbsp;Guillermo Aldama-Bustos,&nbsp;Sarah Tallett-Williams,&nbsp;Manuela Daví,&nbsp;Iain J. Tromans","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01943-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents models to predict median horizontal elastic response spectral accelerations for 5% damping from earthquakes with moment magnitudes ranging from 3.5 to 7.25 occurring in the United Kingdom. This model was derived using the hybrid stochastic-empirical method based on an existing ground-motion model for California and a stochastic model for the UK that was developed specifically for this purpose. The model is presented in two consistent formats, both for two distance metrics, with different target end-users. Firstly, we provide a complete logic tree with 162 branches, and associated weights, capturing epistemic uncertainties in the depth to the top of rupture, geometric spreading, anelastic path attenuation, site attenuation and stress drop, which is more likely to be used for research. The weights for these branches were derived using Bayesian updating of <i>a priori</i> weights from expert judgment. Secondly, we provide a backbone model with three and five branches corresponding to different percentiles, with corresponding weights, capturing the overall epistemic uncertainty, which is tailored for engineering applications. The derived models are compared with ground-motion observations, both instrumental and macroseismic, from the UK and surrounding region (northern France, Belgium, the Netherlands, western Germany and western Scandinavia). These comparisons show that the model is well-centred (low overall bias and no obvious trends with magnitude or distance) and that the branches capture the body and range of the technically defensible interpretations. In addition, comparisons with ground-motion models that have been previously used within seismic hazard assessments for the UK show that ground-motion predictions from the proposed model match those from previous models quite closely for most magnitudes and distances. The models are available as computer subroutines for ease of use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 9","pages":"4265 - 4302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-01943-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ground-motion models for earthquakes occurring in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"John Douglas,&nbsp;Guillermo Aldama-Bustos,&nbsp;Sarah Tallett-Williams,&nbsp;Manuela Daví,&nbsp;Iain J. Tromans\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-01943-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article presents models to predict median horizontal elastic response spectral accelerations for 5% damping from earthquakes with moment magnitudes ranging from 3.5 to 7.25 occurring in the United Kingdom. This model was derived using the hybrid stochastic-empirical method based on an existing ground-motion model for California and a stochastic model for the UK that was developed specifically for this purpose. The model is presented in two consistent formats, both for two distance metrics, with different target end-users. Firstly, we provide a complete logic tree with 162 branches, and associated weights, capturing epistemic uncertainties in the depth to the top of rupture, geometric spreading, anelastic path attenuation, site attenuation and stress drop, which is more likely to be used for research. The weights for these branches were derived using Bayesian updating of <i>a priori</i> weights from expert judgment. Secondly, we provide a backbone model with three and five branches corresponding to different percentiles, with corresponding weights, capturing the overall epistemic uncertainty, which is tailored for engineering applications. The derived models are compared with ground-motion observations, both instrumental and macroseismic, from the UK and surrounding region (northern France, Belgium, the Netherlands, western Germany and western Scandinavia). These comparisons show that the model is well-centred (low overall bias and no obvious trends with magnitude or distance) and that the branches capture the body and range of the technically defensible interpretations. In addition, comparisons with ground-motion models that have been previously used within seismic hazard assessments for the UK show that ground-motion predictions from the proposed model match those from previous models quite closely for most magnitudes and distances. The models are available as computer subroutines for ease of use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"4265 - 4302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-01943-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01943-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01943-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一些模型,用于预测英国发生的矩震级为 3.5 到 7.25 的地震中阻尼为 5%的水平弹性响应谱加速度中值。该模型采用随机-经验混合法,基于现有的加利福尼亚地动模型和专门为此开发的英国随机模型。该模型以两种一致的形式呈现,均适用于两种距离指标,目标终端用户各不相同。首先,我们提供了一个完整的逻辑树,其中包含 162 个分支和相关权重,以捕捉破裂顶端深度、几何扩展、无弹性路径衰减、现场衰减和应力下降等方面的认识不确定性,这更有可能用于研究。这些分支的权重是通过贝叶斯法更新专家判断的先验权重得出的。其次,我们提供了一个骨干模型,该模型有三个和五个分支,分别对应于不同的百分位数,并具有相应的权重,可捕捉整体认识上的不确定性,适合工程应用。我们将得出的模型与英国及周边地区(法国北部、比利时、荷兰、德国西部和斯堪的纳维亚半岛西部)的地动观测数据(包括仪器观测数据和宏观地震观测数据)进行了比较。这些比较结果表明,该模型中心明确(总体偏差小,没有明显的震级或距离趋势),各分支捕捉到了技术上站得住脚的解释的主体和范围。此外,与以前在英国地震灾害评估中使用的地动模型进行的比较表明,在大多数震级和距离上,拟议模型的地动预测与以前模型的预测非常接近。为了便于使用,这些模型可以作为计算机子程序提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ground-motion models for earthquakes occurring in the United Kingdom

Ground-motion models for earthquakes occurring in the United Kingdom

This article presents models to predict median horizontal elastic response spectral accelerations for 5% damping from earthquakes with moment magnitudes ranging from 3.5 to 7.25 occurring in the United Kingdom. This model was derived using the hybrid stochastic-empirical method based on an existing ground-motion model for California and a stochastic model for the UK that was developed specifically for this purpose. The model is presented in two consistent formats, both for two distance metrics, with different target end-users. Firstly, we provide a complete logic tree with 162 branches, and associated weights, capturing epistemic uncertainties in the depth to the top of rupture, geometric spreading, anelastic path attenuation, site attenuation and stress drop, which is more likely to be used for research. The weights for these branches were derived using Bayesian updating of a priori weights from expert judgment. Secondly, we provide a backbone model with three and five branches corresponding to different percentiles, with corresponding weights, capturing the overall epistemic uncertainty, which is tailored for engineering applications. The derived models are compared with ground-motion observations, both instrumental and macroseismic, from the UK and surrounding region (northern France, Belgium, the Netherlands, western Germany and western Scandinavia). These comparisons show that the model is well-centred (low overall bias and no obvious trends with magnitude or distance) and that the branches capture the body and range of the technically defensible interpretations. In addition, comparisons with ground-motion models that have been previously used within seismic hazard assessments for the UK show that ground-motion predictions from the proposed model match those from previous models quite closely for most magnitudes and distances. The models are available as computer subroutines for ease of use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信