英国法律制度中王室特权的性质和问题

Nurullah Görgen
{"title":"英国法律制度中王室特权的性质和问题","authors":"Nurullah Görgen","doi":"10.15337/suhfd.1410591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept and role of the Royal prerogative in the United Kingdom remain unclear and controversial. Particularly, prerogatives of Charles III, who was newly ascended to the throne, and notable cases such as R (Miller) v The Prime Minister have reignited discussions on the position of prerogatives.\nThis article explains the concept, position, and functions of prerogatives to underscore their importance in the English legal system, contrary to claims that they are anachronistic and dysfunctional. To achieve this, the article explores traditional and contemporary definitions to comprehend the concept and then address the origin and evolution of prerogatives throughout history, examining the features they possess today because of these changes. This helps classifying them and addressing the limiting factors. Finally, the article demonstrates how ministers, and the monarch are prevented from violating the law when exercising prerogatives. Thus, it asserts the existence of prerogatives will endure within the UK constitution.","PeriodicalId":34193,"journal":{"name":"Selcuk Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":" 60","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE NATURE AND PROBLEMS OF THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE IN THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM\",\"authors\":\"Nurullah Görgen\",\"doi\":\"10.15337/suhfd.1410591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept and role of the Royal prerogative in the United Kingdom remain unclear and controversial. Particularly, prerogatives of Charles III, who was newly ascended to the throne, and notable cases such as R (Miller) v The Prime Minister have reignited discussions on the position of prerogatives.\\nThis article explains the concept, position, and functions of prerogatives to underscore their importance in the English legal system, contrary to claims that they are anachronistic and dysfunctional. To achieve this, the article explores traditional and contemporary definitions to comprehend the concept and then address the origin and evolution of prerogatives throughout history, examining the features they possess today because of these changes. This helps classifying them and addressing the limiting factors. Finally, the article demonstrates how ministers, and the monarch are prevented from violating the law when exercising prerogatives. Thus, it asserts the existence of prerogatives will endure within the UK constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Selcuk Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\" 60\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Selcuk Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.1410591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selcuk Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.1410591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英国,王室特权的概念和作用仍不明确并存在争议。特别是新登基的查理三世的特权,以及 R (Miller) v The Prime Minister 等著名案件再次引发了对特权地位的讨论。本文解释了特权的概念、地位和功能,以强调其在英国法律体系中的重要性,而不是那些认为其不合时宜和功能失调的说法。为此,文章探讨了传统和当代的定义,以理解这一概念,然后论述了特权在历史上的起源和演变,研究了特权因这些变化而具有的特征。这有助于对特权进行分类并解决限制因素。最后,文章论证了如何防止大臣和君主在行使特权时违反法律。因此,文章断言特权将在英国宪法中继续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE NATURE AND PROBLEMS OF THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE IN THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM
The concept and role of the Royal prerogative in the United Kingdom remain unclear and controversial. Particularly, prerogatives of Charles III, who was newly ascended to the throne, and notable cases such as R (Miller) v The Prime Minister have reignited discussions on the position of prerogatives. This article explains the concept, position, and functions of prerogatives to underscore their importance in the English legal system, contrary to claims that they are anachronistic and dysfunctional. To achieve this, the article explores traditional and contemporary definitions to comprehend the concept and then address the origin and evolution of prerogatives throughout history, examining the features they possess today because of these changes. This helps classifying them and addressing the limiting factors. Finally, the article demonstrates how ministers, and the monarch are prevented from violating the law when exercising prerogatives. Thus, it asserts the existence of prerogatives will endure within the UK constitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信