HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌绝经前患者帕博西尼加依西美坦与GnRH激动剂与卡培他滨的对比:随机 2 期研究 Young-PEARL 的最新生存结果。

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Y. Park, Kyung-Hun Lee, G. Kim, Seok Yun Kang, Keun Seok Lee, J. Kim, K. Lee, H. K. Ahn, Moon Hee Lee, Hee-Jun Kim, H. Kim, S. Koh, Ji-Yeon Kim, J. Sohn, Sung-Bae Kim, Jin Seok Ahn, Seonwoo Kim, Hyun Cho, K. Jung, Seock-Ah Im
{"title":"HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌绝经前患者帕博西尼加依西美坦与GnRH激动剂与卡培他滨的对比:随机 2 期研究 Young-PEARL 的最新生存结果。","authors":"Y. Park, Kyung-Hun Lee, G. Kim, Seok Yun Kang, Keun Seok Lee, J. Kim, K. Lee, H. K. Ahn, Moon Hee Lee, Hee-Jun Kim, H. Kim, S. Koh, Ji-Yeon Kim, J. Sohn, Sung-Bae Kim, Jin Seok Ahn, Seonwoo Kim, Hyun Cho, K. Jung, Seock-Ah Im","doi":"10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba1002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LBA1002 Background: The Young-PEARL study demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS) (mPFS: 20.1 vs. 14.4 mo.) of exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian function suppression (OFS) compared to capecitabine in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Here we report updated survival outcomes with median follow-up of 54.8 months (data cutoff, November 30, 2023). Methods: Premenopausal women aged 19 years or older with HR+/HER2- BC who had relapsed or progressed during previous tamoxifen therapy were enrolled. One line of previous chemotherapy for mBC was allowed. The primary endpoint was PFS, which was defined as the time from C1D1 to disease progression or death. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and toxicities. Results: 184 patients were randomly assigned to exemestane plus palbociclib with OFS (n=92) or capecitabine (n=92). Median age was 44.0 years (range, 28-58). Key efficacy and safety are shown in Table. Final analysis was conducted for 174 patients. The updated mPFS was 19.5 mo. (90% CI, 14.3-22.3) for exemestane + palbociclib + OFS compared with 14.0 mo. (90% CI, 11.7-18.7) for capecitabine (HR 0.75, P=0.04). mOS was 54.8 mo. (95% CI, 48.9-77.1) for palbociclib arm and 57.8 mo. (95% CI, 46.3-N/A) for capecitabine arm (HR 1.06, P=0.77). mPFS2 (from the date of 1st PD to 2nd PD) was significantly shorter in palbociclib arm than those of capecitabine arm (7.5 vs. 11.7 mo. P=0.02). Confirmed ORR based on the investigator assessments was 33.3% (95% CI, 23.6-43.1) for palbociclib and 33.7% (95% CI, 23.6-43.9) for capecitabine. Median treatment duration was 18.9 mo. (range 1.6-88.4) in palbociclib and 13.5 mo. (range 0.1-70.8) in capecitabine. In palbociclib arm, 86 (93.5%) experienced grade 3 or more TEAEs, mainly asymptomatic neutropenia (64.1%), compared to 41 (48.2%) patients with grade ≥3 TEAEs in the capecitabine arm, mainly Hand-Foot syndrome and neutropenia (18.8% for each). Conclusions: Young-PEARL study showed exemestane + palbociclib with OFS improves efficacy compared with capecitabine in terms of PFS, which did not lead to an OS benefit for patients with premenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC (median follow-up duration: 54.8 months). The overall safety profile of palbociclib and capecitabine continues to be manageable with longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT02592746 . [Table: see text]","PeriodicalId":42,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palbociclib plus exemestane with GnRH agonist vs capecitabine in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Updated survival results of the randomized phase 2 study Young-PEARL.\",\"authors\":\"Y. Park, Kyung-Hun Lee, G. Kim, Seok Yun Kang, Keun Seok Lee, J. Kim, K. Lee, H. K. Ahn, Moon Hee Lee, Hee-Jun Kim, H. Kim, S. Koh, Ji-Yeon Kim, J. Sohn, Sung-Bae Kim, Jin Seok Ahn, Seonwoo Kim, Hyun Cho, K. Jung, Seock-Ah Im\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba1002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"LBA1002 Background: The Young-PEARL study demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS) (mPFS: 20.1 vs. 14.4 mo.) of exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian function suppression (OFS) compared to capecitabine in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Here we report updated survival outcomes with median follow-up of 54.8 months (data cutoff, November 30, 2023). Methods: Premenopausal women aged 19 years or older with HR+/HER2- BC who had relapsed or progressed during previous tamoxifen therapy were enrolled. One line of previous chemotherapy for mBC was allowed. The primary endpoint was PFS, which was defined as the time from C1D1 to disease progression or death. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and toxicities. Results: 184 patients were randomly assigned to exemestane plus palbociclib with OFS (n=92) or capecitabine (n=92). Median age was 44.0 years (range, 28-58). Key efficacy and safety are shown in Table. Final analysis was conducted for 174 patients. The updated mPFS was 19.5 mo. (90% CI, 14.3-22.3) for exemestane + palbociclib + OFS compared with 14.0 mo. (90% CI, 11.7-18.7) for capecitabine (HR 0.75, P=0.04). mOS was 54.8 mo. (95% CI, 48.9-77.1) for palbociclib arm and 57.8 mo. (95% CI, 46.3-N/A) for capecitabine arm (HR 1.06, P=0.77). mPFS2 (from the date of 1st PD to 2nd PD) was significantly shorter in palbociclib arm than those of capecitabine arm (7.5 vs. 11.7 mo. P=0.02). Confirmed ORR based on the investigator assessments was 33.3% (95% CI, 23.6-43.1) for palbociclib and 33.7% (95% CI, 23.6-43.9) for capecitabine. Median treatment duration was 18.9 mo. (range 1.6-88.4) in palbociclib and 13.5 mo. (range 0.1-70.8) in capecitabine. In palbociclib arm, 86 (93.5%) experienced grade 3 or more TEAEs, mainly asymptomatic neutropenia (64.1%), compared to 41 (48.2%) patients with grade ≥3 TEAEs in the capecitabine arm, mainly Hand-Foot syndrome and neutropenia (18.8% for each). Conclusions: Young-PEARL study showed exemestane + palbociclib with OFS improves efficacy compared with capecitabine in terms of PFS, which did not lead to an OS benefit for patients with premenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC (median follow-up duration: 54.8 months). The overall safety profile of palbociclib and capecitabine continues to be manageable with longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT02592746 . [Table: see text]\",\"PeriodicalId\":42,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"volume\":\" 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba1002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba1002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

LBA1002 背景:Young-PEARL研究表明,在绝经前HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者中,与卡培他滨相比,依西美坦+帕博西尼加卵巢功能抑制(OFS)可改善无进展生存期(PFS)(mPFS:20.1个月对14.4个月)。我们在此报告中位随访 54.8 个月的最新生存结果(数据截止日期为 2023 年 11 月 30 日)。研究方法年龄在19岁或以上的HR+/HER2- BC绝经前女性患者均被纳入研究,她们在既往接受他莫昔芬治疗期间病情复发或进展。允许既往接受过一种 mBC 化疗。主要终点是PFS,即从C1D1到疾病进展或死亡的时间。主要次要终点是总生存期(OS)。其他次要终点包括客观反应率(ORR)和毒性。研究结果184名患者被随机分配到依西美坦+帕博西尼加OFS(92人)或卡培他滨(92人)。中位年龄为 44.0 岁(28-58 岁)。主要疗效和安全性见表。对174名患者进行了最终分析。依西美坦 + 帕博昔单抗 + OFS 的最新 mPFS 为 19.5 个月(90% CI,14.3-22.3),而卡培他滨为 14.0 个月(90% CI,11.7-18.7)(HR 0.75,P=0.04)。帕博西尼治疗组的 mPFS2(从第 1 个 PD 日到第 2 个 PD 日)明显短于卡培他滨治疗组(7.5 个月 vs. 11.7 个月,P=0.02)。根据研究者评估确认的ORR为:帕博西利33.3%(95% CI,23.6-43.1),卡培他滨33.7%(95% CI,23.6-43.9)。帕博西尼的中位治疗时间为18.9个月(1.6-88.4个月),卡培他滨为13.5个月(0.1-70.8个月)。在帕博西尼治疗组中,86例(93.5%)患者出现3级或以上TEAEs,主要是无症状中性粒细胞减少症(64.1%),而在卡培他滨治疗组中,41例(48.2%)患者出现≥3级TEAEs,主要是手足综合征和中性粒细胞减少症(各占18.8%)。结论Young-PEARL研究显示,与卡培他滨相比,依西美坦+帕博西尼联合OFS可改善绝经前HR+/HER2- mBC患者的PFS疗效,但并未带来OS获益(中位随访时间:54.8个月)。随着随访时间的延长,palbociclib和卡培他滨的总体安全性仍然可控。临床试验信息:NCT02592746 .[表格:见正文]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palbociclib plus exemestane with GnRH agonist vs capecitabine in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Updated survival results of the randomized phase 2 study Young-PEARL.
LBA1002 Background: The Young-PEARL study demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS) (mPFS: 20.1 vs. 14.4 mo.) of exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian function suppression (OFS) compared to capecitabine in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Here we report updated survival outcomes with median follow-up of 54.8 months (data cutoff, November 30, 2023). Methods: Premenopausal women aged 19 years or older with HR+/HER2- BC who had relapsed or progressed during previous tamoxifen therapy were enrolled. One line of previous chemotherapy for mBC was allowed. The primary endpoint was PFS, which was defined as the time from C1D1 to disease progression or death. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and toxicities. Results: 184 patients were randomly assigned to exemestane plus palbociclib with OFS (n=92) or capecitabine (n=92). Median age was 44.0 years (range, 28-58). Key efficacy and safety are shown in Table. Final analysis was conducted for 174 patients. The updated mPFS was 19.5 mo. (90% CI, 14.3-22.3) for exemestane + palbociclib + OFS compared with 14.0 mo. (90% CI, 11.7-18.7) for capecitabine (HR 0.75, P=0.04). mOS was 54.8 mo. (95% CI, 48.9-77.1) for palbociclib arm and 57.8 mo. (95% CI, 46.3-N/A) for capecitabine arm (HR 1.06, P=0.77). mPFS2 (from the date of 1st PD to 2nd PD) was significantly shorter in palbociclib arm than those of capecitabine arm (7.5 vs. 11.7 mo. P=0.02). Confirmed ORR based on the investigator assessments was 33.3% (95% CI, 23.6-43.1) for palbociclib and 33.7% (95% CI, 23.6-43.9) for capecitabine. Median treatment duration was 18.9 mo. (range 1.6-88.4) in palbociclib and 13.5 mo. (range 0.1-70.8) in capecitabine. In palbociclib arm, 86 (93.5%) experienced grade 3 or more TEAEs, mainly asymptomatic neutropenia (64.1%), compared to 41 (48.2%) patients with grade ≥3 TEAEs in the capecitabine arm, mainly Hand-Foot syndrome and neutropenia (18.8% for each). Conclusions: Young-PEARL study showed exemestane + palbociclib with OFS improves efficacy compared with capecitabine in terms of PFS, which did not lead to an OS benefit for patients with premenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC (median follow-up duration: 54.8 months). The overall safety profile of palbociclib and capecitabine continues to be manageable with longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT02592746 . [Table: see text]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.20%
发文量
324
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data is a monthly journal devoted to the publication of data obtained from both experiment and computation, which are viewed as complementary. It is the only American Chemical Society journal primarily concerned with articles containing data on the phase behavior and the physical, thermodynamic, and transport properties of well-defined materials, including complex mixtures of known compositions. While environmental and biological samples are of interest, their compositions must be known and reproducible. As a result, adsorption on natural product materials does not generally fit within the scope of Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信