可切除 NSCLC 患者(pts)的新辅助 nivolumab (NIVO) + 化疗 (chemo) vs 化疗:CheckMate 816 的 4 年更新。

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jonathan D Spicer, Nicolas Girard, Mariano Provencio, Changli Wang, Tetsuya Mitsudomi, Mark M. Awad, E. Vokes, Janis M Taube, L. Lupinacci, G. Saylors, Fumihiro Tanaka, Moishe Liberman, Sung Yong Lee, A. Alexandru, M. D'Arcangelo, P. Tran, Javed Mahmood, Vishwanath Gharpure, Apurva Bhingare, P. Forde
{"title":"可切除 NSCLC 患者(pts)的新辅助 nivolumab (NIVO) + 化疗 (chemo) vs 化疗:CheckMate 816 的 4 年更新。","authors":"Jonathan D Spicer, Nicolas Girard, Mariano Provencio, Changli Wang, Tetsuya Mitsudomi, Mark M. Awad, E. Vokes, Janis M Taube, L. Lupinacci, G. Saylors, Fumihiro Tanaka, Moishe Liberman, Sung Yong Lee, A. Alexandru, M. D'Arcangelo, P. Tran, Javed Mahmood, Vishwanath Gharpure, Apurva Bhingare, P. Forde","doi":"10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba8010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LBA8010 Background: The phase 3 CheckMate 816 study established neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care for eligible pts with resectable NSCLC. Here, we report the 4-year survival update from this study, representing the longest follow-up among all global phase 3 studies evaluating neoadjuvant or perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Methods: Adults with stage IB (≥ 4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC v7) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no known EGFR/ ALK alterations were randomized 1:1 to receive NIVO 360 mg + chemo Q3W or chemo alone Q3W for 3 cycles, followed by surgery. Event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR; both per blinded independent review) were primary endpoints and were both statistically significant. Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint. Exploratory analyses included efficacy by pCR status and extent of resection. Results: At the 23 Feb 2024 database lock (median follow-up, 57.6 mo), NIVO + chemo continued to improve EFS vs chemo (median, 43.8 mo vs 18.4 mo; HR [95% CI], 0.66 [0.49–0.90]); 4-year EFS rates were 49% vs 38%. EFS favored NIVO + chemo vs chemo regardless of whether pts had lobectomy or pneumonectomy (Table), with 56%–57% vs 40%–43% of pts without disease recurrence at 4 years. NIVO + chemo also continued to show OS improvement vs chemo (HR [98.36% CI], 0.71 [0.47–1.07]; P = 0.0451; median OS was not reached [NR] in both arms, and the significance boundary was not met at this interim analysis). An OS improvement of 13% was sustained over time for NIVO + chemo vs chemo; 4-year OS rates were 71% vs 58%. Pts in the NIVO + chemo arm who had pCR continued to have improved OS vs those who did not (HR [95% CI], 0.08 [0.02–0.34]); 4-year OS rates, 95% vs 63%); a similar trend was seen in the chemo arm, although few pts had pCR with chemo (n = 4). No new safety signals were observed at this update. Additional survival analyses in pt subgroups and by ctDNA levels will be presented. Conclusions: In this 4-year analysis from CheckMate 816, neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo sustained EFS and OS separation vs chemo over time and demonstrated the long-term survival benefit of having pCR in pts with resectable NSCLC. These data provide the first understanding of the long-term benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy when added to chemo, reinforcing neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care, and providing a benchmark to assess the benefits of all perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02998528 . [Table: see text]","PeriodicalId":42,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo in patients (pts) with resectable NSCLC: 4-year update from CheckMate 816.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan D Spicer, Nicolas Girard, Mariano Provencio, Changli Wang, Tetsuya Mitsudomi, Mark M. Awad, E. Vokes, Janis M Taube, L. Lupinacci, G. Saylors, Fumihiro Tanaka, Moishe Liberman, Sung Yong Lee, A. Alexandru, M. D'Arcangelo, P. Tran, Javed Mahmood, Vishwanath Gharpure, Apurva Bhingare, P. Forde\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba8010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"LBA8010 Background: The phase 3 CheckMate 816 study established neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care for eligible pts with resectable NSCLC. Here, we report the 4-year survival update from this study, representing the longest follow-up among all global phase 3 studies evaluating neoadjuvant or perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Methods: Adults with stage IB (≥ 4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC v7) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no known EGFR/ ALK alterations were randomized 1:1 to receive NIVO 360 mg + chemo Q3W or chemo alone Q3W for 3 cycles, followed by surgery. Event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR; both per blinded independent review) were primary endpoints and were both statistically significant. Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint. Exploratory analyses included efficacy by pCR status and extent of resection. Results: At the 23 Feb 2024 database lock (median follow-up, 57.6 mo), NIVO + chemo continued to improve EFS vs chemo (median, 43.8 mo vs 18.4 mo; HR [95% CI], 0.66 [0.49–0.90]); 4-year EFS rates were 49% vs 38%. EFS favored NIVO + chemo vs chemo regardless of whether pts had lobectomy or pneumonectomy (Table), with 56%–57% vs 40%–43% of pts without disease recurrence at 4 years. NIVO + chemo also continued to show OS improvement vs chemo (HR [98.36% CI], 0.71 [0.47–1.07]; P = 0.0451; median OS was not reached [NR] in both arms, and the significance boundary was not met at this interim analysis). An OS improvement of 13% was sustained over time for NIVO + chemo vs chemo; 4-year OS rates were 71% vs 58%. Pts in the NIVO + chemo arm who had pCR continued to have improved OS vs those who did not (HR [95% CI], 0.08 [0.02–0.34]); 4-year OS rates, 95% vs 63%); a similar trend was seen in the chemo arm, although few pts had pCR with chemo (n = 4). No new safety signals were observed at this update. Additional survival analyses in pt subgroups and by ctDNA levels will be presented. Conclusions: In this 4-year analysis from CheckMate 816, neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo sustained EFS and OS separation vs chemo over time and demonstrated the long-term survival benefit of having pCR in pts with resectable NSCLC. These data provide the first understanding of the long-term benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy when added to chemo, reinforcing neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care, and providing a benchmark to assess the benefits of all perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02998528 . [Table: see text]\",\"PeriodicalId\":42,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"volume\":\" 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba8010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba8010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

LBA8010 背景:3 期 CheckMate 816 研究确立了新辅助 NIVO + 化疗作为符合条件的可切除 NSCLC 患者的标准治疗方法。在此,我们报告了该研究的 4 年生存率更新情况,这是全球所有评估新辅助或围手术期免疫疗法的 3 期研究中随访时间最长的一项。研究方法对IB期(≥ 4 cm)-IIIA期(根据AJCC v7)可切除NSCLC、ECOG PS≤1、无已知EGFR/ALK改变的成人进行1:1随机分组,接受NIVO 360 mg + 化疗Q3W或单独化疗Q3W,共3个周期,然后进行手术。无事件生存期(EFS)和病理完全缓解(pCR;均为独立盲审)是主要终点,均具有统计学意义。总生存期(OS)是关键的次要终点。探索性分析包括按 pCR 状态和切除范围进行的疗效分析。研究结果在2024年2月23日数据库锁定时(中位随访57.6个月),NIVO+化疗与化疗相比继续改善了EFS(中位43.8个月 vs 18.4个月;HR [95% CI],0.66 [0.49-0.90]);4年EFS率为49% vs 38%。无论患者是进行了肺叶切除术还是肺切除术,NIVO+化疗与化疗的疗效都更佳(见表),4年后无疾病复发的患者比例分别为56%-57%与40%-43%。NIVO+化疗与化疗相比也继续改善了患者的OS(HR [98.36% CI],0.71 [0.47-1.07];P = 0.0451;两组患者的中位OS均未达到[NR],本次中期分析未达到显著性界限)。随着时间的推移,NIVO+化疗与化疗相比,OS提高了13%;4年OS率分别为71%和58%。NIVO+化疗组中出现pCR的患者与未出现pCR的患者相比,OS持续改善(HR[95% CI],0.08 [0.02-0.34]);4年OS率为95% vs 63%);化疗组也出现了类似的趋势,尽管化疗组中出现pCR的患者很少(n = 4)。本次更新未发现新的安全性信号。此外,还将对pt亚组和ctDNA水平进行生存期分析。结论:在CheckMate 816的这项为期4年的分析中,新辅助NIVO+化疗与化疗相比,随着时间的推移,EFS和OS持续分离,并证明了可切除NSCLC患者获得pCR的长期生存获益。这些数据首次阐明了新辅助免疫疗法在化疗基础上的长期获益,巩固了新辅助NIVO+化疗作为标准治疗的地位,并为评估所有围手术期免疫疗法的获益提供了基准。临床试验信息:NCT02998528 .[表格:见正文]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo in patients (pts) with resectable NSCLC: 4-year update from CheckMate 816.
LBA8010 Background: The phase 3 CheckMate 816 study established neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care for eligible pts with resectable NSCLC. Here, we report the 4-year survival update from this study, representing the longest follow-up among all global phase 3 studies evaluating neoadjuvant or perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Methods: Adults with stage IB (≥ 4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC v7) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no known EGFR/ ALK alterations were randomized 1:1 to receive NIVO 360 mg + chemo Q3W or chemo alone Q3W for 3 cycles, followed by surgery. Event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR; both per blinded independent review) were primary endpoints and were both statistically significant. Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint. Exploratory analyses included efficacy by pCR status and extent of resection. Results: At the 23 Feb 2024 database lock (median follow-up, 57.6 mo), NIVO + chemo continued to improve EFS vs chemo (median, 43.8 mo vs 18.4 mo; HR [95% CI], 0.66 [0.49–0.90]); 4-year EFS rates were 49% vs 38%. EFS favored NIVO + chemo vs chemo regardless of whether pts had lobectomy or pneumonectomy (Table), with 56%–57% vs 40%–43% of pts without disease recurrence at 4 years. NIVO + chemo also continued to show OS improvement vs chemo (HR [98.36% CI], 0.71 [0.47–1.07]; P = 0.0451; median OS was not reached [NR] in both arms, and the significance boundary was not met at this interim analysis). An OS improvement of 13% was sustained over time for NIVO + chemo vs chemo; 4-year OS rates were 71% vs 58%. Pts in the NIVO + chemo arm who had pCR continued to have improved OS vs those who did not (HR [95% CI], 0.08 [0.02–0.34]); 4-year OS rates, 95% vs 63%); a similar trend was seen in the chemo arm, although few pts had pCR with chemo (n = 4). No new safety signals were observed at this update. Additional survival analyses in pt subgroups and by ctDNA levels will be presented. Conclusions: In this 4-year analysis from CheckMate 816, neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo sustained EFS and OS separation vs chemo over time and demonstrated the long-term survival benefit of having pCR in pts with resectable NSCLC. These data provide the first understanding of the long-term benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy when added to chemo, reinforcing neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care, and providing a benchmark to assess the benefits of all perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02998528 . [Table: see text]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.20%
发文量
324
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data is a monthly journal devoted to the publication of data obtained from both experiment and computation, which are viewed as complementary. It is the only American Chemical Society journal primarily concerned with articles containing data on the phase behavior and the physical, thermodynamic, and transport properties of well-defined materials, including complex mixtures of known compositions. While environmental and biological samples are of interest, their compositions must be known and reproducible. As a result, adsorption on natural product materials does not generally fit within the scope of Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信