{"title":"最后的地址:作为纪念场所和交流形式的纪念牌匾","authors":"Daria Khrushcheva","doi":"10.14746/strp.2024.49.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memorial plaques are one of the most common forms of commemorative practices. Organically fitting into the geographical and socio-cultural landscape and having several functions, memorial plaques not only become a kind of marker of a “site of memory” (lieu de mémoire), play an important role in preserving names, transmitting historical memory, but also contribute to the construction and consolidation in the mass consciousness of ideologically verified representations of historical political events. Various “initiatives from below” and projects of independent activists (for example, the “Last Address” (“Poslednij adres”) project with memorial tablets to victims of state terror or the anonymous “questions about repressions” action discussed in this article) become vivid examples of how today’s Russian civil society reacts to a unilateral submission historical facts by power structures. The organizers of such actions become new actors in the politics of memory. They seek not only to expand the space of specific “places of memory” – memorial plaques and their contents – but also to change the perception of certain historical events and attitudes towards them. On the example of memorial plaques as a form of commemoration, the article examines the communicative strategies of different groups of memory subjects in modern Russia. ","PeriodicalId":34286,"journal":{"name":"Studia Rossica Posnaniensia","volume":"80 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Last Addresses: Commemorative plaques as lieux de mémoire and a form of communication\",\"authors\":\"Daria Khrushcheva\",\"doi\":\"10.14746/strp.2024.49.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Memorial plaques are one of the most common forms of commemorative practices. Organically fitting into the geographical and socio-cultural landscape and having several functions, memorial plaques not only become a kind of marker of a “site of memory” (lieu de mémoire), play an important role in preserving names, transmitting historical memory, but also contribute to the construction and consolidation in the mass consciousness of ideologically verified representations of historical political events. Various “initiatives from below” and projects of independent activists (for example, the “Last Address” (“Poslednij adres”) project with memorial tablets to victims of state terror or the anonymous “questions about repressions” action discussed in this article) become vivid examples of how today’s Russian civil society reacts to a unilateral submission historical facts by power structures. The organizers of such actions become new actors in the politics of memory. They seek not only to expand the space of specific “places of memory” – memorial plaques and their contents – but also to change the perception of certain historical events and attitudes towards them. On the example of memorial plaques as a form of commemoration, the article examines the communicative strategies of different groups of memory subjects in modern Russia. \",\"PeriodicalId\":34286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Rossica Posnaniensia\",\"volume\":\"80 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Rossica Posnaniensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2024.49.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Rossica Posnaniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2024.49.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
纪念牌匾是最常见的纪念形式之一。纪念牌匾与地理和社会文化景观有机地结合在一起,具有多种功能,不仅成为 "记忆场所"(lieu de mémoire)的一种标志,在保存姓名、传播历史记忆方面发挥着重要作用,而且有助于在大众意识中构建和巩固经过意识形态验证的历史政治事件表述。各种 "自下而上的倡议 "和独立活动家的项目(例如,"最后的地址"("Poslednij adres")项目中的国家恐怖受害者纪念碑或本文讨论的匿名 "关于镇压的问题 "行动)成为当今俄罗斯民间社会如何对权力机构单方面提交历史事实做出反应的生动例子。这些行动的组织者成为记忆政治的新参与者。他们不仅寻求扩大特定 "记忆场所"--纪念牌匾及其内容--的空间,还寻求改变人们对某些历史事件的看法和态度。文章以纪念牌匾这种纪念形式为例,探讨了现代俄罗斯不同记忆主体群体的交流策略。
Last Addresses: Commemorative plaques as lieux de mémoire and a form of communication
Memorial plaques are one of the most common forms of commemorative practices. Organically fitting into the geographical and socio-cultural landscape and having several functions, memorial plaques not only become a kind of marker of a “site of memory” (lieu de mémoire), play an important role in preserving names, transmitting historical memory, but also contribute to the construction and consolidation in the mass consciousness of ideologically verified representations of historical political events. Various “initiatives from below” and projects of independent activists (for example, the “Last Address” (“Poslednij adres”) project with memorial tablets to victims of state terror or the anonymous “questions about repressions” action discussed in this article) become vivid examples of how today’s Russian civil society reacts to a unilateral submission historical facts by power structures. The organizers of such actions become new actors in the politics of memory. They seek not only to expand the space of specific “places of memory” – memorial plaques and their contents – but also to change the perception of certain historical events and attitudes towards them. On the example of memorial plaques as a form of commemoration, the article examines the communicative strategies of different groups of memory subjects in modern Russia.