染料去除的革命性变革:释放液-液批量萃取工艺的能量

IF 2.9 4区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kedar Sahoo, Uma Sankar Behera, Sourav Poddar, Hun-Soo Byun
{"title":"染料去除的革命性变革:释放液-液批量萃取工艺的能量","authors":"Kedar Sahoo,&nbsp;Uma Sankar Behera,&nbsp;Sourav Poddar,&nbsp;Hun-Soo Byun","doi":"10.1007/s11814-024-00203-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study focuses on numerically optimizing key process parameters related to the liquid–liquid extraction batch process (LLEBP) technique for carrying out batch runs to remove methyl red effectively (MR) from dye effluent. LLEBP, a suitable industrial process for treating dye effluents, depends on the number of reaction parameters such as feed concentration, extraction time, and dye ratio (solution/solvent). The current research utilized a central composite design (CCD) of experiments along with numerical optimization techniques to optimize process parameters over a range of dye concentrations: (20–100) ppm, extraction time range 10–30 min, and dye ratio 1–3 mL/mL (solution/solvent). The batch runs performed at room temperature and a constant pH of 3, according to the experimental design criteria, suggest that maximum dye removal efficiency and distribution coefficient value could be achieved within the feed concentration range of (20–30) ppm, 20–30 min of extraction time, and 1–3 mL/mL of dye ratio (solution/solvent). Solvent capacity increases significantly within the (60–100) ppm feed concentration range. Numerical optimization with desirability function criteria identified optimal conditions: 20 ppm dye concentration, 30 min extraction time, and 3 mL/mL dye ratio ensuring maximum LLEBP yield. The current investigation achieved a 4% higher dye removal (%) of 85.682 compared to the previous study. The distribution coefficient and solvent capacity attained were 5.287 and 4.504 mg/L, respectively. The research enhances understanding of the optimization process for LLEBP in MR dye removal from textile effluent, surpassing previous findings within the same input range. The manuscript aims to maximize process optimization using CCD, promoting sustainable industry progress in line with UN sustainable development goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":684,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"41 9","pages":"2621 - 2638"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revolutionizing Dye Removal: Unleashing the Power of Liquid–Liquid Extraction Batch Process\",\"authors\":\"Kedar Sahoo,&nbsp;Uma Sankar Behera,&nbsp;Sourav Poddar,&nbsp;Hun-Soo Byun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11814-024-00203-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study focuses on numerically optimizing key process parameters related to the liquid–liquid extraction batch process (LLEBP) technique for carrying out batch runs to remove methyl red effectively (MR) from dye effluent. LLEBP, a suitable industrial process for treating dye effluents, depends on the number of reaction parameters such as feed concentration, extraction time, and dye ratio (solution/solvent). The current research utilized a central composite design (CCD) of experiments along with numerical optimization techniques to optimize process parameters over a range of dye concentrations: (20–100) ppm, extraction time range 10–30 min, and dye ratio 1–3 mL/mL (solution/solvent). The batch runs performed at room temperature and a constant pH of 3, according to the experimental design criteria, suggest that maximum dye removal efficiency and distribution coefficient value could be achieved within the feed concentration range of (20–30) ppm, 20–30 min of extraction time, and 1–3 mL/mL of dye ratio (solution/solvent). Solvent capacity increases significantly within the (60–100) ppm feed concentration range. Numerical optimization with desirability function criteria identified optimal conditions: 20 ppm dye concentration, 30 min extraction time, and 3 mL/mL dye ratio ensuring maximum LLEBP yield. The current investigation achieved a 4% higher dye removal (%) of 85.682 compared to the previous study. The distribution coefficient and solvent capacity attained were 5.287 and 4.504 mg/L, respectively. The research enhances understanding of the optimization process for LLEBP in MR dye removal from textile effluent, surpassing previous findings within the same input range. The manuscript aims to maximize process optimization using CCD, promoting sustainable industry progress in line with UN sustainable development goals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"2621 - 2638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11814-024-00203-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11814-024-00203-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是对液液萃取间歇工艺(LLEBP)技术的关键工艺参数进行数值优化,以进行间歇运行,有效去除染料废水中的甲基红(MR)。LLEBP 是一种适用于处理染料废水的工业工艺,它取决于进料浓度、萃取时间和染料比(溶液/溶剂)等反应参数的数量。目前的研究采用了中央复合实验设计(CCD)和数值优化技术,在染料浓度(20-100)ppm、萃取时间(10-30 分钟)和染料比(1-3 mL/mL,溶液/溶剂)的范围内优化工艺参数。根据实验设计标准,在室温和恒定 pH 值为 3 的条件下进行的批次运行表明,在进料浓度为 (20-30) ppm、萃取时间为 20-30 分钟、染料比为 1-3 mL/mL(溶液/溶剂)的范围内,染料去除率和分配系数值可达到最大值。在进料浓度为 (60-100) ppm 的范围内,溶剂容量会明显增加。利用可取函数标准进行的数值优化确定了最佳条件:20 ppm 的染料浓度、30 分钟的萃取时间和 3 mL/mL 的染料比可确保最大的 LLEBP 产量。与之前的研究相比,本次研究的染料去除率(%)提高了 4%,达到 85.682。分配系数和溶剂容量分别为 5.287 和 4.504 mg/L。这项研究加深了人们对 LLEBP 去除纺织污水中 MR 染料的优化过程的理解,在相同的输入范围内超越了之前的研究结果。该手稿旨在利用 CCD 最大限度地优化工艺,促进可持续工业发展,以实现联合国可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Revolutionizing Dye Removal: Unleashing the Power of Liquid–Liquid Extraction Batch Process

Revolutionizing Dye Removal: Unleashing the Power of Liquid–Liquid Extraction Batch Process

This study focuses on numerically optimizing key process parameters related to the liquid–liquid extraction batch process (LLEBP) technique for carrying out batch runs to remove methyl red effectively (MR) from dye effluent. LLEBP, a suitable industrial process for treating dye effluents, depends on the number of reaction parameters such as feed concentration, extraction time, and dye ratio (solution/solvent). The current research utilized a central composite design (CCD) of experiments along with numerical optimization techniques to optimize process parameters over a range of dye concentrations: (20–100) ppm, extraction time range 10–30 min, and dye ratio 1–3 mL/mL (solution/solvent). The batch runs performed at room temperature and a constant pH of 3, according to the experimental design criteria, suggest that maximum dye removal efficiency and distribution coefficient value could be achieved within the feed concentration range of (20–30) ppm, 20–30 min of extraction time, and 1–3 mL/mL of dye ratio (solution/solvent). Solvent capacity increases significantly within the (60–100) ppm feed concentration range. Numerical optimization with desirability function criteria identified optimal conditions: 20 ppm dye concentration, 30 min extraction time, and 3 mL/mL dye ratio ensuring maximum LLEBP yield. The current investigation achieved a 4% higher dye removal (%) of 85.682 compared to the previous study. The distribution coefficient and solvent capacity attained were 5.287 and 4.504 mg/L, respectively. The research enhances understanding of the optimization process for LLEBP in MR dye removal from textile effluent, surpassing previous findings within the same input range. The manuscript aims to maximize process optimization using CCD, promoting sustainable industry progress in line with UN sustainable development goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
310
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering provides a global forum for the dissemination of research in chemical engineering. The Journal publishes significant research results obtained in the Asia-Pacific region, and simultaneously introduces recent technical progress made in other areas of the world to this region. Submitted research papers must be of potential industrial significance and specifically concerned with chemical engineering. The editors will give preference to papers having a clearly stated practical scope and applicability in the areas of chemical engineering, and to those where new theoretical concepts are supported by new experimental details. The Journal also regularly publishes featured reviews on emerging and industrially important subjects of chemical engineering as well as selected papers presented at international conferences on the subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信